WWTBAM theoretical meta-question
-
- Posts: 48
- Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2012 11:45 am
WWTBAM theoretical meta-question
Just wondering here...is this (purposefully ridiculously simple) sample question valid or invalid for WWTBAM purposes?
Which of the following fruits is red?
A: Apple
B: Banana
C: Coffee
D: Dandelion
I'm just a bit curious. One of the questions from 5/8/13 has a question that's more complex, but is essentially the same form, and I'm wondering if anyone sees a foul here - I won't spoil it, and I'll post on the transcript when it comes.
Which of the following fruits is red?
A: Apple
B: Banana
C: Coffee
D: Dandelion
I'm just a bit curious. One of the questions from 5/8/13 has a question that's more complex, but is essentially the same form, and I'm wondering if anyone sees a foul here - I won't spoil it, and I'll post on the transcript when it comes.
- littlebeast13
- Dumbass
- Posts: 31133
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 7:20 pm
- Location: Between the Sterilite and the Farberware
- Contact:
Re: WWTBAM theoretical meta-question
talkinaway wrote:Which of the following fruits is red?
A: Apple
B: Banana
C: Coffee
D: Dandelion
All of the above?
lb13
Thursday comics! Squirrel pictures! The link to my CafePress store! All kinds of fun stuff!!!!
Visit my Evil Squirrel blog here: http://evilsquirrelsnest.com
Visit my Evil Squirrel blog here: http://evilsquirrelsnest.com
- themanintheseersuckersuit
- Posts: 7619
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 6:37 pm
- Location: South Carolina
Re: WWTBAM theoretical meta-question
let's see
some apples are red some are not
ripe coffee beans are red, perhaps all of them
red bananas exist some bananas are not red
bad question
some apples are red some are not
ripe coffee beans are red, perhaps all of them
red bananas exist some bananas are not red
bad question
Suitguy is not bitter.
feels he represents the many educated and rational onlookers who believe that the hysterical denouncement of lay scepticism is both unwarranted and counter-productive
The problem, then, is that such calls do not address an opposition audience so much as they signal virtue. They talk past those who need convincing. They ignore actual facts and counterargument. And they are irreparably smug.
feels he represents the many educated and rational onlookers who believe that the hysterical denouncement of lay scepticism is both unwarranted and counter-productive
The problem, then, is that such calls do not address an opposition audience so much as they signal virtue. They talk past those who need convincing. They ignore actual facts and counterargument. And they are irreparably smug.
- TheConfessor
- Posts: 6462
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 1:11 pm
Re: WWTBAM theoretical meta-question
I didn't see the 5/8/13 episode and I don't know when a transcript might be posted, but I think you can safely post the question without upsetting anyone.talkinaway wrote:Just wondering here...is this (purposefully ridiculously simple) sample question valid or invalid for WWTBAM purposes?
Which of the following fruits is red?
A: Apple
B: Banana
C: Coffee
D: Dandelion
I'm just a bit curious. One of the questions from 5/8/13 has a question that's more complex, but is essentially the same form, and I'm wondering if anyone sees a foul here - I won't spoil it, and I'll post on the transcript when it comes.
I'm not sure what point you're trying to illustrate, but I don't think the question above works as written. Apples are commonly red, but there are many exceptions. Bananas are typically green or yellow, but there are exotic varieties that are red or reddish on the outside. Coffee beans (fruits) are typically reddish. I am not aware of any part of the dandelion that would be considered a fruit, so that seems to violate the premise of the question.
- jarnon
- Posts: 6368
- Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 9:52 pm
- Location: Merion, Pa.
Re: WWTBAM theoretical meta-question
Thinking too linearly, I assumed coffee and dandelions weren't fruits. But TMITSSS and TheConfessor correctly point out that coffee can mean either a red bean or a black beverage. I couldn't imagine dandelion seeds could be fruits; however:
But even if some of the choices really weren't fruits, it's still an acceptable question. Questions like that appear often, as in this example:Wikipedia wrote:The flower heads mature into spherical seed heads called "blowballs" or "clocks" containing many single-seeded fruits called achenes.
Sig and Keith used "plant material" as a clue to eliminate silk.BBTranscriptTeam wrote:Captain Sig Hansen and Captain Keith Colburn
Question #10 (Inventions Revisited - Level
While Edison did not independently invent the light bulb, he perfected it by discovering made of what plant material burned the longest?
A - hemp
B - linen
C - bamboo
D - silk
Keith says it's definitely not. Sig emphasizes "plant material" and says thatSpoiler
bamboo. They decide to ask the audience.Spoiler
silk is not a plantMeredith says that Sig and Keith may have influenced the audience. It's a good number, though, and they go with it.ATA results
A - 65%
B - 10%
C - 15%
D - 10%Spoiler
Answer: C (bamboo)
Value: $5,000
Bank: $10,000 (guaranteed donation to charity)
Слава Україні!
עם ישראל חי
עם ישראל חי
-
- Posts: 48
- Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2012 11:45 am
Re: WWTBAM theoretical meta-question
My point, and I failed to make it, was supposed to be that dandelions and coffee are (supposed to be) neither red nor fruit.
The question was a 100k question asking which $240 Monopoly property was renamed to MLK boulevard in Atlantic city. There aren't even four $240 properties in Monopoly. IMO, the question should have read "which Monopoly property is worth $240 and was renamed to MLK Boulevard".
The question was a 100k question asking which $240 Monopoly property was renamed to MLK boulevard in Atlantic city. There aren't even four $240 properties in Monopoly. IMO, the question should have read "which Monopoly property is worth $240 and was renamed to MLK Boulevard".
- jaybee
- Posts: 1922
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 8:44 pm
- Location: Knoxville, TN
Re: WWTBAM theoretical meta-question
Maybe I just don't quite understand but to me the question of "Which $240 Monopoly property was renamed to MLK boulevard in Atlantic City" makes perfect sense. To me, it describes the property as costing $240 and being on the game Monopoly. Only Illinois ave fits that description. Just because there were three other properties listed as choices doesn't mean that they too carried a value of $240.talkinaway wrote:My point, and I failed to make it, was supposed to be that dandelions and coffee are (supposed to be) neither red nor fruit.
The question was a 100k question asking which $240 Monopoly property was renamed to MLK boulevard in Atlantic city. There aren't even four $240 properties in Monopoly. IMO, the question should have read "which Monopoly property is worth $240 and was renamed to MLK Boulevard".
You version of the question is also correct, but they both make perfect sense to me. In order to answer the question, one must be familiar with the Monopoly board game. If you are familiar with the game, you will know that the only group of four properties that have the same value would be the railroads - at $200 each. Since $200 does not equal $240, then the RR's are out. All others are either paired or singles, no matter if they are utilities, sets of two or the more typical set of three. If you are familiar with Monopoly, then this is an easy question. If you are not, then you are toast as there is no way to logic it out.
On a sideways slant: I remember reading somewhere that Illinois Ave was the most landed on space on the board. Something to do with the combinations of the dice probabilities, the fact that there is an "Advance to Illinois Ave" card, it's location in relation the the jail and even the other "advance to" cards.
Jaybee
- littlebeast13
- Dumbass
- Posts: 31133
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 7:20 pm
- Location: Between the Sterilite and the Farberware
- Contact:
Re: WWTBAM theoretical meta-question
jaybee wrote:On a sideways slant: I remember reading somewhere that Illinois Ave was the most landed on space on the board. Something to do with the combinations of the dice probabilities, the fact that there is an "Advance to Illinois Ave" card, it's location in relation the the jail and even the other "advance to" cards.
I've heard this factoid as well before, and always thought it was an odd spot to be the "most landed on".
I think you are right about it being the closest "advance to..." spot from the jail (St. Charles Place can't be reached on a roll from the jail, unless you cheat), and that gives it the edge....
lb13
Thursday comics! Squirrel pictures! The link to my CafePress store! All kinds of fun stuff!!!!
Visit my Evil Squirrel blog here: http://evilsquirrelsnest.com
Visit my Evil Squirrel blog here: http://evilsquirrelsnest.com
-
- Posts: 48
- Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2012 11:45 am
Re: WWTBAM theoretical meta-question
Well, I just figured that if the question was "Which of the following Xs is also a Y?", that you could implicitly assume that all of the answer choices already had property X, and that exactly one of them also had property Y. I will grant that it's a bit of a nitpick, and, yes, it's obvious to anyone who's played Monopoly that there can be at most two $240 properties (and that there is, in fact, only one).
In all fairness, I do agree that in this particular instance, it was pretty clear that only one answer was remotely possible - both from the $240 clue and the MLK clue. But I've actually been watching Millionaire the past year or so like a hawk for questions like these, and, to the best of my knowledge, whenever they ask a question like this, it's done the "right" way. If the question asks "Which of the following child actors...", then the options are always four child actors.
In all fairness, I do agree that in this particular instance, it was pretty clear that only one answer was remotely possible - both from the $240 clue and the MLK clue. But I've actually been watching Millionaire the past year or so like a hawk for questions like these, and, to the best of my knowledge, whenever they ask a question like this, it's done the "right" way. If the question asks "Which of the following child actors...", then the options are always four child actors.
- jarnon
- Posts: 6368
- Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 9:52 pm
- Location: Merion, Pa.
Re: WWTBAM theoretical meta-question
Found it!littlebeast13 wrote:talkinaway wrote:Which of the following fruits is red?
A: Apple
B: Banana
C: Coffee
D: Dandelion
All of the above?
lb13
Слава Україні!
עם ישראל חי
עם ישראל חי
- littlebeast13
- Dumbass
- Posts: 31133
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 7:20 pm
- Location: Between the Sterilite and the Farberware
- Contact:
Re: WWTBAM theoretical meta-question
jarnon wrote:Found it!littlebeast13 wrote:talkinaway wrote:Which of the following fruits is red?
A: Apple
B: Banana
C: Coffee
D: Dandelion
All of the above?
lb13
I think you're winning the game this year....
lb13
Thursday comics! Squirrel pictures! The link to my CafePress store! All kinds of fun stuff!!!!
Visit my Evil Squirrel blog here: http://evilsquirrelsnest.com
Visit my Evil Squirrel blog here: http://evilsquirrelsnest.com
- jaybee
- Posts: 1922
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 8:44 pm
- Location: Knoxville, TN
Re: WWTBAM theoretical meta-question
If the question is considered 'flawed' then it is in a way that actually gives you a better chance of answering correctly as they are giving two clues to the answer. It could just as easily been: "In the game of Monopoly, what property sells for $240?" (requiring a knowledge of the game to answer) or "What Monopoly based property was recently renamed MLK Blvd?" (requiring some current events knowledge to answer).
With the way the question was phrased, you could correctly answer if you had never seen a monopoly board or if you had never seen the MLK reference.
With the way the question was phrased, you could correctly answer if you had never seen a monopoly board or if you had never seen the MLK reference.
Jaybee
-
- Posts: 48
- Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2012 11:45 am
Re: WWTBAM theoretical meta-question
I agree with that to a degree - and I definitely agree with it since the show's not timed, and, in theory, on Millionaire the contestants have time to get a hold of their nerves and read, reread, and rereread the questions.
That said, I could see a nervous and careless contestant not really "getting" that the $240 part was really the easier clue (for most), and not the MLK Boulevard part. I got it almost instantly, since I knew that the tan properties ended at $200, and that either Indiana or Illinois was the premium red property, so it would be $40 more. If I'm getting a Round 2 question that easily, it's probably WAY too easy, IMO. At that level, they probably should have nixed the $240 part of the clue altogether....unless more than one road in Atlantic City was renamed MLK.
That said, I could see a nervous and careless contestant not really "getting" that the $240 part was really the easier clue (for most), and not the MLK Boulevard part. I got it almost instantly, since I knew that the tan properties ended at $200, and that either Indiana or Illinois was the premium red property, so it would be $40 more. If I'm getting a Round 2 question that easily, it's probably WAY too easy, IMO. At that level, they probably should have nixed the $240 part of the clue altogether....unless more than one road in Atlantic City was renamed MLK.
- MarleysGh0st
- Posts: 27934
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:55 am
- Location: Elsewhere
Re: WWTBAM theoretical meta-question
Without the $240 clue, this question would have been impossible for anyone outside Atlantic City. Lots of cities have renamed streets in honor of MLK. (Ithaca has one, although it also kept the old street name, so it has double road signs.) Knowing which one in AC was so named is not anything the nation would be aware of.talkinaway wrote:At that level, they probably should have nixed the $240 part of the clue altogether....unless more than one road in Atlantic City was renamed MLK.
-
- Posts: 696
- Joined: Sun Jun 07, 2009 3:11 am
- Location: Avon Park, FL
Re: WWTBAM theoretical meta-question
This is something a lot of people bring up when they watch my episode.
They say to me, "Oh, well, Fanta was the only one of those that's a soft drink." One of the things Rich explained to us during a question run-through backstage was that, if something asks "Which of these X's is a Y", then, for the most part, we can be sure that they're not trying to trick us in that some of the answer choices are not X's. A soft drink need not be carbonated (right?), so unless it is, I actually had three clues leading me to the correct answer (Pope, Germany, and soft drink). Interesting that this seems to break that unwritten rule (shockers).BBTranscriptTeam wrote: $100K - Perhaps because it originated in his home country of Germany, Pope Benedict XVI reportedly drinks what soft drink every day?
A - Orangina
B - Yoo-Hoo
C - Fanta
D - Kool-Aid
Hans has a slight hunch. He's leaning towardthinking it was a foreign drink and the others are domestic. Hans is a "water kind of guy". $60,600 is a year's worth of med school tuition and he feels like he's played a pretty good game, so he's going to walk away.Spoiler
FantaSpoiler
C (Fanta)
THE END OF GAME "NOISE"
In this town, don't we love it now, everbody's waiting for the next surprise!
- TheConfessor
- Posts: 6462
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 1:11 pm
Re: WWTBAM theoretical meta-question
WWRD - What Would Rosner Do?
http://articles.latimes.com/2001/feb/02 ... t/ca-20332
http://articles.latimes.com/2001/feb/02 ... t/ca-20332
- Rafferbee
- Posts: 758
- Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2008 11:43 am
- Location: Columbia, MD
- Contact:
Re: WWTBAM theoretical meta-question
No. think of a soft drink as in opposition to "hard drinks", i.e., those that get you drunk.hanzz wrote: They say to me, "Oh, well, Fanta was the only one of those that's a soft drink." One of the things Rich explained to us during a question run-through backstage was that, if something asks "Which of these X's is a Y", then, for the most part, we can be sure that they're not trying to trick us in that some of the answer choices are not X's. A soft drink need not be carbonated (right?),
- Ritterskoop
- Posts: 5738
- Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 10:16 pm
- Location: Charlotte, NC
Re: WWTBAM theoretical meta-question
My Monopoly secrets:
Buy up all the railroads. Swap anything up to green properties to get them. Sometimes even Boardwalk or Park Place, as long as it doesn't give the other player the pair.
Buy up the purple properties just after the jail, and the orange ones after that if you can. Because everybody goes to jail, and has to pay you rent when they hit your properties on the way out. I buy up that whole side if I can.
I rarely get to complete both strategies, but when it works, the game's over quickly.
Buy up all the railroads. Swap anything up to green properties to get them. Sometimes even Boardwalk or Park Place, as long as it doesn't give the other player the pair.
Buy up the purple properties just after the jail, and the orange ones after that if you can. Because everybody goes to jail, and has to pay you rent when they hit your properties on the way out. I buy up that whole side if I can.
I rarely get to complete both strategies, but when it works, the game's over quickly.
If you fail to pilot your own ship, don't be surprised at what inappropriate port you find yourself docked. - Tom Robbins
--------
At the moment of commitment, the universe conspires to assist you. - attributed to Johann Wolfgang von Goethe.
--------
At the moment of commitment, the universe conspires to assist you. - attributed to Johann Wolfgang von Goethe.
- etaoin22
- FNGD Forum Moderator
- Posts: 3655
- Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2007 6:09 pm
Re: WWTBAM theoretical meta-question
that one alone worked well for Commodore Vanderbilt.Ritterskoop wrote:My Monopoly secrets:
Buy up all the railroads.