Page 3 of 3

Re: Can We Start a Pool?

Posted: Fri Jan 25, 2019 10:14 am
by silverscreenselect
I eagerly await Flock's spin on this to see how many times he uses the phrases "liberal media," "fake news," and his new favorite "bat-phone."

Re: Can We Start a Pool?

Posted: Fri Jan 25, 2019 12:24 pm
by Bob Juch

Re: Can We Start a Pool?

Posted: Fri Jan 25, 2019 12:29 pm
by flockofseagulls104
silverscreenselect wrote:I eagerly await Flock's spin on this to see how many times he uses the phrases "liberal media," "fake news," and his new favorite "bat-phone."
Will it amaze, amuse or make you glad?

Re: Can We Start a Pool?

Posted: Fri Jan 25, 2019 1:12 pm
by tlynn78
flockofseagulls104 wrote:
silverscreenselect wrote:I eagerly await Flock's spin on this to see how many times he uses the phrases "liberal media," "fake news," and his new favorite "bat-phone."
Will it amaze, amuse or make you glad?
It gives him tingles. You should probably consider a restraining order. The poor boo needs a hobby.

Re: Can We Start a Pool?

Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2019 10:35 pm
by jarnon
(Well, I was mistaken. No indictments today. I won't try to second-guess Mueller or look for patterns any more.)

Re: Can We Start a Pool?

Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2019 12:26 am
by Estonut
jarnon wrote:If it's Trump Jr., please let his Secret Service detail do the honors.
I'm pretty sure that's not in their job descriptor.

Re: Can We Start a Pool?

Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2019 8:20 pm
by jarnon

Re: Can We Start a Pool?

Posted: Fri Mar 22, 2019 3:27 pm
by jarnon
Mr. Mueller has completed his investigation.

Image

Re: Can We Start a Pool?

Posted: Fri Mar 22, 2019 10:18 pm
by flockofseagulls104
silverscreenselect wrote:
BackInTex wrote:
silverscreenselect wrote:
The indictment doesn't exonerate anyone. In fact, it says that the 13 Russians conspired with others, known and unknown to the Grand Jury. This just means that Mueller didn't want to tip his hand at this particular time. I'm not sure how many, if any, of these Russians can actually be brought to trial in the U.S., but my feeling is that any of them who are arrested won't have much compunction about flipping on Kushner, Trump Jr., or anyone else. The easiest way to prove that an "unwitting" member of the Trump campaign was in fact quite witting will be for one of them to flip.

This was just Mueller's first move (and, again, it's one that no one was predicting).
They won't flip because there is no one to flip on.
This is one post I'm definitely going to bookmark for future reference.
Here it is. aSSShole. BINGO!

Re: Can We Start a Pool?

Posted: Thu Apr 11, 2019 6:41 am
by jarnon

Re: Can We Start a Pool?

Posted: Thu Apr 11, 2019 7:02 am
by BackInTex
Just the first linked to the Obama administration. More to come.

Lawyers expect ex-Obama counsel to be indicted in case linked to Mueller probe

Re: Can We Start a Pool?

Posted: Thu Apr 11, 2019 7:36 am
by silverscreenselect
I expect Assange, who's going to be back in the US fairly soon, will be questioned by the FBI about his ties to various Trump interests. From what we can tell from the Barr letter, Mueller's conclusion of no provable collusion only applied to representatives of the Russian government, which Assange is not.

Re: Can We Start a Pool?

Posted: Thu Apr 11, 2019 7:42 am
by BackInTex
silverscreenselect wrote:
I expect Assange, who's going to be back in the US fairly soon, will be questioned by the FBI about his ties to various Trump interests. From what we can tell from the Barr letter, Mueller's conclusion of no provable collusion only applied to representatives of the Russian government, which Assange is not.
You are funny.

Again, so far, after two full years of all out investigation, the ONLY collusion with Russian interests, related to the 2016 election campaigns, was by the DNC and Clinton campaigns. Period.

Re: Can We Start a Pool?

Posted: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:40 pm
by wbtravis007
BackInTex wrote:
silverscreenselect wrote:
I expect Assange, who's going to be back in the US fairly soon, will be questioned by the FBI about his ties to various Trump interests. From what we can tell from the Barr letter, Mueller's conclusion of no provable collusion only applied to representatives of the Russian government, which Assange is not.
You are funny.

Again, so far, after two full years of all out investigation, the ONLY collusion with Russian interests, related to the 2016 election campaigns, was by the DNC and Clinton campaigns. Period.
ICM!

Further proof that love is blind.

And that hate is too.

Re: Can We Start a Pool?

Posted: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:08 pm
by Bob Juch
:lol:
BackInTex wrote:
silverscreenselect wrote:
I expect Assange, who's going to be back in the US fairly soon, will be questioned by the FBI about his ties to various Trump interests. From what we can tell from the Barr letter, Mueller's conclusion of no provable collusion only applied to representatives of the Russian government, which Assange is not.
You are funny.

Again, so far, after two full years of all out investigation, the ONLY collusion with Russian interests, related to the 2016 election campaigns, was by the DNC and Clinton campaigns. Period.
:lol:

Re: Can We Start a Pool?

Posted: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:17 pm
by Bob78164
Bob Juch wrote::lol:
BackInTex wrote:
silverscreenselect wrote:
I expect Assange, who's going to be back in the US fairly soon, will be questioned by the FBI about his ties to various Trump interests. From what we can tell from the Barr letter, Mueller's conclusion of no provable collusion only applied to representatives of the Russian government, which Assange is not.
You are funny.

Again, so far, after two full years of all out investigation, the ONLY collusion with Russian interests, related to the 2016 election campaigns, was by the DNC and Clinton campaigns. Period.
:lol:
Give him a break. He's wearing his krasni-colored glasses. --Bob