One Vote
- silverscreenselect
- Posts: 23270
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:21 pm
- Contact:
One Vote
... really does matter.
A recount today in a Virginia Hose of Delegates race, originally won by Republican David Yancey over Democrat Shelly Simonds by 10 votes, resulted in Simonds picking up 11 votes to win by a single vote. The result must be certified by a three-judge panel tomorrow, but if it holds, would result in a 50-50 tie in the House and, probably, some sort of power-sharing arrangement. Two other recounts are also pending but are less likely to change the results because the margins of victory were larger (82 and 336 votes). In addition, in the district in which the Republican won by 82 votes, a Federal lawsuit is pending because 147 voters in that district were incorrectly assigned to another district. That lawsuit could result in a special election.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/vi ... 7621494ade
A recount today in a Virginia Hose of Delegates race, originally won by Republican David Yancey over Democrat Shelly Simonds by 10 votes, resulted in Simonds picking up 11 votes to win by a single vote. The result must be certified by a three-judge panel tomorrow, but if it holds, would result in a 50-50 tie in the House and, probably, some sort of power-sharing arrangement. Two other recounts are also pending but are less likely to change the results because the margins of victory were larger (82 and 336 votes). In addition, in the district in which the Republican won by 82 votes, a Federal lawsuit is pending because 147 voters in that district were incorrectly assigned to another district. That lawsuit could result in a special election.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/vi ... 7621494ade
Check out our website: http://www.silverscreenvideos.com
- Bob78164
- Bored Moderator
- Posts: 21643
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:02 pm
- Location: By the phone
Re: One Vote
The means the Democratic pickup in the General Assembly was 16 seats, bringing the chamber from a 66-34 Republican edge to a 50-50 tie. --Bob
"Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason than that of blindfolded fear." Thomas Jefferson
- silverscreenselect
- Posts: 23270
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:21 pm
- Contact:
Re: One Vote
This election got even more bizarre. The Republicans successfully challenged one single ballot that was somewhat confusingly marked and previously counted for the Democratic candidate. The judges have now thrown that ballot out and the result, barring further changes, is now a tie. Under Virginia law, the tie will be decided by drawing lots.
So, essentially, a coin flip could well decide control of the Virginia legislature for the next two years.
So, essentially, a coin flip could well decide control of the Virginia legislature for the next two years.
Check out our website: http://www.silverscreenvideos.com
- Bob78164
- Bored Moderator
- Posts: 21643
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:02 pm
- Location: By the phone
Re: One Vote
As I understand it, the ballot previously wasn't counted at all but now is being counted for the Republican candidate.silverscreenselect wrote:This election got even more bizarre. The Republicans successfully challenged one single ballot that was somewhat confusingly marked and previously counted for the Democratic candidate. The judges have now thrown that ballot out and the result, barring further changes, is now a tie. Under Virginia law, the tie will be decided by drawing lots.
So, essentially, a coin flip could well decide control of the Virginia legislature for the next two years.
I haven't seen a picture of the disputed ballot, but based on the description I've read it does seem to me that all of the decision makers are trying to be fair. The voter marked both candidates and then drew a line through the Democrat's name. The argument is that the voter intended to vote for the Republican because the other votes on that ballot were cast for Republican candidates. Assuming that Virginia uses an "ascertainable intent of the voter" standard, I think either decision is reasonable, particularly if there's precedent for using votes in other races to ascertain the voter's intent in the race under review. --Bob
"Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason than that of blindfolded fear." Thomas Jefferson
- Estonut
- Evil Genius
- Posts: 10495
- Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 1:16 am
- Location: Garden Grove, CA
Re: One Vote
If a line is drawn through the Democrat's name, how can that possibly be interpreted to be the voter's choice?Bob78164 wrote:As I understand it, the ballot previously wasn't counted at all but now is being counted for the Republican candidate.silverscreenselect wrote:This election got even more bizarre. The Republicans successfully challenged one single ballot that was somewhat confusingly marked and previously counted for the Democratic candidate. The judges have now thrown that ballot out and the result, barring further changes, is now a tie. Under Virginia law, the tie will be decided by drawing lots.
So, essentially, a coin flip could well decide control of the Virginia legislature for the next two years.
I haven't seen a picture of the disputed ballot, but based on the description I've read it does seem to me that all of the decision makers are trying to be fair. The voter marked both candidates and then drew a line through the Democrat's name. The argument is that the voter intended to vote for the Republican because the other votes on that ballot were cast for Republican candidates. Assuming that Virginia uses an "ascertainable intent of the voter" standard, I think either decision is reasonable, particularly if there's precedent for using votes in other races to ascertain the voter's intent in the race under review.
A child of five would understand this. Send someone to fetch a child of five.
Groucho Marx
Groucho Marx
- Bob78164
- Bored Moderator
- Posts: 21643
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:02 pm
- Location: By the phone
Re: One Vote
That's why a picture would help. Did the voter intend to draw the line through the name to strike it out or as an underscore to emphasize that this was the voter's choice? --BobEstonut wrote:If a line is drawn through the Democrat's name, how can that possibly be interpreted to be the voter's choice?Bob78164 wrote:As I understand it, the ballot previously wasn't counted at all but now is being counted for the Republican candidate.silverscreenselect wrote:This election got even more bizarre. The Republicans successfully challenged one single ballot that was somewhat confusingly marked and previously counted for the Democratic candidate. The judges have now thrown that ballot out and the result, barring further changes, is now a tie. Under Virginia law, the tie will be decided by drawing lots.
So, essentially, a coin flip could well decide control of the Virginia legislature for the next two years.
I haven't seen a picture of the disputed ballot, but based on the description I've read it does seem to me that all of the decision makers are trying to be fair. The voter marked both candidates and then drew a line through the Democrat's name. The argument is that the voter intended to vote for the Republican because the other votes on that ballot were cast for Republican candidates. Assuming that Virginia uses an "ascertainable intent of the voter" standard, I think either decision is reasonable, particularly if there's precedent for using votes in other races to ascertain the voter's intent in the race under review.
"Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason than that of blindfolded fear." Thomas Jefferson
- Estonut
- Evil Genius
- Posts: 10495
- Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 1:16 am
- Location: Garden Grove, CA
Re: One Vote
Bob78164 wrote:That's why a picture would help. Did the voter intend to draw the line through the name to strike it out or as an underscore to emphasize that this was the voter's choice?Estonut wrote:If a line is drawn through the Democrat's name, how can that possibly be interpreted to be the voter's choice?Bob78164 wrote:As I understand it, the ballot previously wasn't counted at all but now is being counted for the Republican candidate.
I haven't seen a picture of the disputed ballot, but based on the description I've read it does seem to me that all of the decision makers are trying to be fair. The voter marked both candidates and then drew a line through the Democrat's name. The argument is that the voter intended to vote for the Republican because the other votes on that ballot were cast for Republican candidates. Assuming that Virginia uses an "ascertainable intent of the voter" standard, I think either decision is reasonable, particularly if there's precedent for using votes in other races to ascertain the voter's intent in the race under review.
Spoiler
A child of five would understand this. Send someone to fetch a child of five.
Groucho Marx
Groucho Marx
- Bob78164
- Bored Moderator
- Posts: 21643
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:02 pm
- Location: By the phone
Re: One Vote
Here's a picture of the ballot.Bob78164 wrote:That's why a picture would help. Did the voter intend to draw the line through the name to strike it out or as an underscore to emphasize that this was the voter's choice? --BobEstonut wrote:If a line is drawn through the Democrat's name, how can that possibly be interpreted to be the voter's choice?Bob78164 wrote:As I understand it, the ballot previously wasn't counted at all but now is being counted for the Republican candidate.
I haven't seen a picture of the disputed ballot, but based on the description I've read it does seem to me that all of the decision makers are trying to be fair. The voter marked both candidates and then drew a line through the Democrat's name. The argument is that the voter intended to vote for the Republican because the other votes on that ballot were cast for Republican candidates. Assuming that Virginia uses an "ascertainable intent of the voter" standard, I think either decision is reasonable, particularly if there's precedent for using votes in other races to ascertain the voter's intent in the race under review.
My initial understanding was not correct. Both bubbles were filled in, and then a slash was placed through the bubble indicating the Democrat, not the Democrat's name. That seems fairly ambiguous to me, but it doesn't change my opinion that everyone involved is doing their best to get it right. --Bob
"Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason than that of blindfolded fear." Thomas Jefferson
- Estonut
- Evil Genius
- Posts: 10495
- Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 1:16 am
- Location: Garden Grove, CA
Re: One Vote
I noticed this when I copied and pasted to search for an image of the ballot. This name seems more appropriate...silverscreenselect wrote:... really does matter.
A recount today in a Virginia Hose of Delegates race, ...
A child of five would understand this. Send someone to fetch a child of five.
Groucho Marx
Groucho Marx
- Bob Juch
- Posts: 26470
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:58 am
- Location: Oro Valley, Arizona
- Contact:
Re: One Vote
David Yancey is my 8th cousin. His mother is a Holocaust survivor:
https://collections.ushmm.org/search/catalog/irn507546
I wouldn't have voted for him.
https://collections.ushmm.org/search/catalog/irn507546
I wouldn't have voted for him.
Last edited by Bob Juch on Fri Dec 29, 2017 11:31 am, edited 1 time in total.
I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I needed to be.
- Douglas Adams (1952 - 2001)
Si fractum non sit, noli id reficere.
Teach a child to be polite and courteous in the home and, when he grows up, he'll never be able to drive in New Jersey.
- Douglas Adams (1952 - 2001)
Si fractum non sit, noli id reficere.
Teach a child to be polite and courteous in the home and, when he grows up, he'll never be able to drive in New Jersey.
- Estonut
- Evil Genius
- Posts: 10495
- Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 1:16 am
- Location: Garden Grove, CA
Re: One Vote
I bet they both know how to spell it correctly...Bob Juch wrote:David Yancey is my 8th cousin. His mother is a Holicost survivor:
https://collections.ushmm.org/search/catalog/irn507546
I wouldn't have voted for him.
You got 6 of 9 letters right.
A child of five would understand this. Send someone to fetch a child of five.
Groucho Marx
Groucho Marx
- jarnon
- Posts: 6292
- Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 9:52 pm
- Location: Merion, Pa.
Re: One Vote
This looks mighty ambiguous. The voter filled in the circle for the Republican running for governor, and emphasized it with an X. For other offices, the circle for the Republican is simply filled in. But for delegate, both circles are filled in but one has a single line through it. Is the line meant to highlight the right candidate or cross out the wrong one?Estonut wrote:Spoiler
Слава Україні!
עם ישראל חי
עם ישראל חי
- littlebeast13
- Dumbass
- Posts: 31112
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 7:20 pm
- Location: Between the Sterilite and the Farberware
- Contact:
Re: One Vote
jarnon wrote:This looks mighty ambiguous. The voter filled in the circle for the Republican running for governor, and emphasized it with an X. For other offices, the circle for the Republican is simply filled in. But for delegate, both circles are filled in but one has a single line through it. Is the line meant to highlight the right candidate or cross out the wrong one?Estonut wrote:Spoiler
I find this to be a fascinating exercise in intent without giving a rat's ass about the political implications...
My interpretation is that this voter started out by assuming the bubbles had to be X'ed out... starting with the governor's race and moving across the ballot rather than down it. They (third person gender neutral pronouns FTW) apparently made it halfway through their X for the House race before apparently realizing they had screwed up (Maybe also realizing they weren't voting for the candidate they wanted since it would be their only vote for a D). I'd bet a forensic team could figure out whether the X on the governor's vote was made over or under the coloring of the circle (My bet is obviously under)...
There is no way to accurately determine what the voter's intent was for that race on this ballot, and they compounded their initial error(s) by not requesting a new ballot once they messed up (Isn't that part of the instructions to voters is that you can request a new ballot if you screw up? I can't remember). There should be no room for any ambiguity when it comes to an official election, though I have my doubts there's any process left in this world that isn't influenced by political machinations anymore. If this ballot's vote for the House race is not completely disregarded, I'll even more firmly believe that to be true...
lb13
Thursday comics! Squirrel pictures! The link to my CafePress store! All kinds of fun stuff!!!!
Visit my Evil Squirrel blog here: http://evilsquirrelsnest.com
Visit my Evil Squirrel blog here: http://evilsquirrelsnest.com
- mrkelley23
- Posts: 6268
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 6:48 pm
- Location: Somewhere between Bureaucracy and Despair
Re: One Vote
I don't disagree with lb's interpretation, but I believe there are other explanations just as meaningful. The panel cites that this person voted for "all" the other Republicans, so they must've intended to vote for the Republican in this race. But there are only three other partisan races on the ballot. One might as well say this person intended to vote for women in partisan races, since that's what they did. I"m actually inclined to believe lb's explanation of the voter's actions, which to me means this ballot shouldn't be counted, on the grounds the voter is too effin' stupid to count.littlebeast13 wrote:jarnon wrote:This looks mighty ambiguous. The voter filled in the circle for the Republican running for governor, and emphasized it with an X. For other offices, the circle for the Republican is simply filled in. But for delegate, both circles are filled in but one has a single line through it. Is the line meant to highlight the right candidate or cross out the wrong one?Estonut wrote:Spoiler
I find this to be a fascinating exercise in intent without giving a rat's ass about the political implications...
My interpretation is that this voter started out by assuming the bubbles had to be X'ed out... starting with the governor's race and moving across the ballot rather than down it. They (third person gender neutral pronouns FTW) apparently made it halfway through their X for the House race before apparently realizing they had screwed up (Maybe also realizing they weren't voting for the candidate they wanted since it would be their only vote for a D). I'd bet a forensic team could figure out whether the X on the governor's vote was made over or under the coloring of the circle (My bet is obviously under)...
There is no way to accurately determine what the voter's intent was for that race on this ballot, and they compounded their initial error(s) by not requesting a new ballot once they messed up (Isn't that part of the instructions to voters is that you can request a new ballot if you screw up? I can't remember). There should be no room for any ambiguity when it comes to an official election, though I have my doubts there's any process left in this world that isn't influenced by political machinations anymore. If this ballot's vote for the House race is not completely disregarded, I'll even more firmly believe that to be true...
lb13
But all that is beside the point, to me. If an election has been recounted three times, to within a 0.04% uncertainty, and there is not a clear winner, then there should either be a new election (usually too expensive and time-consuming) or some sort of truly random selection. Or, better yet, a Survivor-style fire-building-like contest. See who can recall the most words of the state constitution in a row. Give them a test over Virginia history. Have them write a proposed ordinance by themself, then have a legal committee look it over to decide who wrote it best.
A guy can dream, can't he?
For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled. -- Richard Feynman
- ghostjmf
- Posts: 7421
- Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 11:09 am
Re: One Vote
In Mass, & presumably all states with written-on-paper ballots, people who screw up ballots are given replacements. And screwed-up ballots are put in special pile just for tallying at end-of-day to prove that they didn't leave the building. Tallies are made at end of day so that # of ballots actually counted by end of day equal # of voters.
Machines that ballots are fed into reject ballots where people have voted for 2 people in a "must-choose-one" race, have colored egregiously outside the lines, that sort of thing. A poll worker will examine the ballot, point out what caused rejection, & get the voter to have "spoiled ballot" replaced.
But if the goofy ballot is an absentee ballot, poll workers, one from each party that has a candidate in the race, have to decide, if possible, "what they meant" after the polls have closed.
Yes, I've been a poll-worker in a paper-ballot place.
I should go read this thread to study what's supposed to have happened here.
Machines that ballots are fed into reject ballots where people have voted for 2 people in a "must-choose-one" race, have colored egregiously outside the lines, that sort of thing. A poll worker will examine the ballot, point out what caused rejection, & get the voter to have "spoiled ballot" replaced.
But if the goofy ballot is an absentee ballot, poll workers, one from each party that has a candidate in the race, have to decide, if possible, "what they meant" after the polls have closed.
Yes, I've been a poll-worker in a paper-ballot place.
I should go read this thread to study what's supposed to have happened here.
Last edited by ghostjmf on Thu Dec 21, 2017 10:28 am, edited 1 time in total.
- ghostjmf
- Posts: 7421
- Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 11:09 am
Re: One Vote
Having now looked at ballot, which any working paper-ballot-reading machine a pollworker trying to feed it into (that's how absentee ballots get treated where I worked) would kick out, I'd throw out the 2 votes in the "pick one" column & also throw out the whole field where the voter wrote a line through their circle.
But I've never been the person who helps decide this stuff.
But I've never been the person who helps decide this stuff.
- ghostjmf
- Posts: 7421
- Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 11:09 am
Re: One Vote
In case you're wondering, the machine will also reject a ballot filled in with some color ink it can't read, or where there's some mysterious tiny damage to an edge of the ballot that caused it to not feed in properly.
Those kind of rejected ballots are easy for "deciders" to count. Someone who used light ink isn't following directions, but its not going to get their vote thrown out.
Those kind of rejected ballots are easy for "deciders" to count. Someone who used light ink isn't following directions, but its not going to get their vote thrown out.
- Im_Ace
- Posts: 241
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 2:33 pm
Re: One Vote
It would be nice if you could spell correctly.Bob Juch wrote:David Yancey is my 8th cousin. His mother is a Holicost survivor:
https://collections.ushmm.org/search/catalog/irn507546
I wouldn't have voted for him.
:::: taping my watch ::::
- Bob Juch
- Posts: 26470
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:58 am
- Location: Oro Valley, Arizona
- Contact:
Re: One Vote
Yes, and it would be better if my spell checker flagged that.Im_Ace wrote:It would be nice if you could spell correctly.Bob Juch wrote:David Yancey is my 8th cousin. His mother is a Holicost survivor:
https://collections.ushmm.org/search/catalog/irn507546
I wouldn't have voted for him.
I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I needed to be.
- Douglas Adams (1952 - 2001)
Si fractum non sit, noli id reficere.
Teach a child to be polite and courteous in the home and, when he grows up, he'll never be able to drive in New Jersey.
- Douglas Adams (1952 - 2001)
Si fractum non sit, noli id reficere.
Teach a child to be polite and courteous in the home and, when he grows up, he'll never be able to drive in New Jersey.
- silverscreenselect
- Posts: 23270
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:21 pm
- Contact:
Re: One Vote
They held the draw today to decide the contested race and Republican David Yancey won, giving the Republicans a 51-49 edge in the Virginia House. However, there is still a lawsuit pending about the validity of the one ballot that was in question.
Check out our website: http://www.silverscreenvideos.com
- Bob78164
- Bored Moderator
- Posts: 21643
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:02 pm
- Location: By the phone
Re: One Vote
More importantly, there's also a federal lawsuit about another district, decided by fewer than 100 votes, in which voters were mistakenly assigned to the wrong district. That resulted in some people voting in the district who shouldn't have been able to do so, and others not getting to vote in the district at issue even though they were entitled to do so. The number of affected voters was more than the margin of victory. --Bobsilverscreenselect wrote:They held the draw today to decide the contested race and Republican David Yancey won, giving the Republicans a 51-49 edge in the Virginia House. However, there is still a lawsuit pending about the validity of the one ballot that was in question.
"Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason than that of blindfolded fear." Thomas Jefferson