WWTBAM Bored

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov has claimed that Moscow dictated where U.S., British and French forces were allowed to attack in the weekend's air strikes on suspected Syrian chemical weapons facilities, Sky News reported.

http://www.newsweek.com/now-russia-says ... omb-895204

Bob Juch wrote:Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov has claimed that Moscow dictated where U.S., British and French forces were allowed to attack in the weekend's air strikes on suspected Syrian chemical weapons facilities, Sky News reported.

http://www.newsweek.com/now-russia-says ... omb-895204

Why are you amplifying a potential disinformation campaign from a foreign power without independent verification? --Bob

Bob78164 wrote:

Bob Juch wrote:Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov has claimed that Moscow dictated where U.S., British and French forces were allowed to attack in the weekend's air strikes on suspected Syrian chemical weapons facilities, Sky News reported.

http://www.newsweek.com/now-russia-says ... omb-895204

Why are you amplifying a potential disinformation campaign from a foreign power without independent verification? --Bob

OMG bob-tel!
Because he's BJ.

flockofseagulls104 wrote:

Bob78164 wrote:

Bob Juch wrote:Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov has claimed that Moscow dictated where U.S., British and French forces were allowed to attack in the weekend's air strikes on suspected Syrian chemical weapons facilities, Sky News reported.

http://www.newsweek.com/now-russia-says ... omb-895204

Why are you amplifying a potential disinformation campaign from a foreign power without independent verification? --Bob

OMG bob-tel!
Because he's BJ.

Why can't you resist ad hominem attacks? --Bob

Bob78164 wrote:

flockofseagulls104 wrote:

Bob78164 wrote:Why are you amplifying a potential disinformation campaign from a foreign power without independent verification? --Bob

OMG bob-tel!
Because he's BJ.

Why can't you resist ad hominem attacks? --Bob

Methinks you're too sensitive. What was an attack? I was actually complimenting you for a rare reasonable post.

Bob78164 wrote:

Bob Juch wrote:Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov has claimed that Moscow dictated where U.S., British and French forces were allowed to attack in the weekend's air strikes on suspected Syrian chemical weapons facilities, Sky News reported.

http://www.newsweek.com/now-russia-says ... omb-895204

Why are you amplifying a potential disinformation campaign from a foreign power without independent verification? --Bob

Actually, there have been other claiming the same thing, in Syria's administration, for example.

I suspected the same thing as Russia had threatened to retaliate if we fired missiles and they did not.

flockofseagulls104 wrote:

Bob78164 wrote:

flockofseagulls104 wrote: OMG bob-tel!
Because he's BJ.

Why can't you resist ad hominem attacks? --Bob

Methinks you're too sensitive. What was an attack? I was actually complimenting you for a rare reasonable post.

Your post was an ad hominem attack on Bob Juch. --Bob

Bob78164 wrote:

flockofseagulls104 wrote:

Bob78164 wrote:Why can't you resist ad hominem attacks? --Bob

Methinks you're too sensitive. What was an attack? I was actually complimenting you for a rare reasonable post.

Your post was an ad hominem attack on Bob Juch. --Bob

How so? He does it and he has always done it. It is who he is. So are you now the bored content monitor, bob-tel?

flockofseagulls104 wrote:

Bob78164 wrote:

flockofseagulls104 wrote:
Methinks you're too sensitive. What was an attack? I was actually complimenting you for a rare reasonable post.

Your post was an ad hominem attack on Bob Juch. --Bob

How so? He does it and he has always done it. It is who he is. So are you now the bored content monitor, bob-tel?

"It is who he is" is pretty much the definition of an ad hominem attack.

If you have a problem with being called out on your posts, make better posts. --Bob

Bob78164 wrote:

flockofseagulls104 wrote:

Bob78164 wrote:Your post was an ad hominem attack on Bob Juch. --Bob

How so? He does it and he has always done it. It is who he is. So are you now the bored content monitor, bob-tel?

"It is who he is" is pretty much the definition of an ad hominem attack.

If you have a problem with being called out on your posts, make better posts. --Bob

Your flocking hubris grows by leaps and bounds, bob-tel. You obviously have a problem being called out on your post calling me out on my post congratulating you and giving you an answer to your rhetorical question.

Let me explain it to you, bob-tel. When I said 'it is who he is', I was answering your question as to why he did what he did. It was not in response to any opinion or position he took on an issue. It was an answer to your question as to why he posted it. It was not an attack of any kind, and if my answer to you had any negative connotation, it came from the question that you asked. I have been known to engage in sarcastic ad hominem attacks from time to time. This wasn't one of them.

I guess you learned a new term today from your 'sources' and are trying it out. Be careful, bob-tel. People who live in glass houses, you know. You are the ad hominem king.

Does this post meet your standards, bob-tel?