Joe Arpaio learns his pardon was an admission of guilt
Posted: Sun May 20, 2018 2:09 pm
A home for the weary.
https://www.wwtbambored.com/
Just a typo. Since my hand operation, I sometimes don't hit the leftmost keys hard enough.BackInTex wrote:Would you please correct your grammar? It hurts to see this show up.
Thanks
Also, the link should be a url, not an img.Bob Juch wrote:Just a typo. Since my hand operation, I sometimes don't hit the leftmost keys hard enough.BackInTex wrote:Would you please correct your grammar? It hurts to see this show up.
Thanks
One would have to be some kind of self-professed computer nerd to understand the difference...jarnon wrote:Also, the link should be a url, not an img.Bob Juch wrote:Just a typo. Since my hand operation, I sometimes don't hit the leftmost keys hard enough.BackInTex wrote:Would you please correct your grammar? It hurts to see this show up.
Thanks
Ouch!Estonut wrote:One would have to be some kind of self-professed computer nerd to understand the difference...jarnon wrote:Also, the link should be a url, not an img.Bob Juch wrote:Just a typo. Since my hand operation, I sometimes don't hit the leftmost keys hard enough.
This computer nerd was just too busy to double-check.Estonut wrote:One would have to be some kind of self-professed computer nerd to understand the difference...jarnon wrote:Also, the link should be a url, not an img.Bob Juch wrote:Just a typo. Since my hand operation, I sometimes don't hit the leftmost keys hard enough.
Figures. People make careers cleaning up after computer nerds "too busy" to check their work.Bob Juch wrote:This computer nerd was just too busy to double-check.Estonut wrote:One would have to be some kind of self-professed computer nerd to understand the difference...jarnon wrote:Also, the link should be a url, not an img.
Actually, that's my career.Estonut wrote:Figures. People make careers cleaning up after computer nerds "too busy" to check their work.Bob Juch wrote:This computer nerd was just too busy to double-check.Estonut wrote:One would have to be some kind of self-professed computer nerd to understand the difference...
So he thinks that being required to obey a court order is an unreasonable law? That's one helluva position for a former sheriff to take. --Bobjarnon wrote:I'd say Sheriff Joe thinks he's "guilty" of breaking an unreasonable law, like Roy Moore when he displayed the Ten Commandments.
But perfect for a senator!Bob78164 wrote:So he thinks that being required to obey a court order is an unreasonable law? That's one helluva position for a former sheriff to take.jarnon wrote:I'd say Sheriff Joe thinks he's "guilty" of breaking an unreasonable law, like Roy Moore when he displayed the Ten Commandments.
Or acting Attorney General.Estonut wrote:But perfect for a senator!Bob78164 wrote:So he thinks that being required to obey a court order is an unreasonable law? That's one helluva position for a former sheriff to take.jarnon wrote:I'd say Sheriff Joe thinks he's "guilty" of breaking an unreasonable law, like Roy Moore when he displayed the Ten Commandments.
I think part of the reason Alabama is now represented by Senator Jones is that many of Alabama's voters didn't see it that way. That's why the race was close enough that the scandal could flip the seat. --BobEstonut wrote:But perfect for a senator!Bob78164 wrote:So he thinks that being required to obey a court order is an unreasonable law? That's one helluva position for a former sheriff to take.jarnon wrote:I'd say Sheriff Joe thinks he's "guilty" of breaking an unreasonable law, like Roy Moore when he displayed the Ten Commandments.
You really didn't get that that was a joke?Bob78164 wrote:I think part of the reason Alabama is now represented by Senator Jones is that many of Alabama's voters didn't see it that way. That's why the race was close enough that the scandal could flip the seat.Estonut wrote:But perfect for a senator!Bob78164 wrote:So he thinks that being required to obey a court order is an unreasonable law? That's one helluva position for a former sheriff to take.
Too close to home, given how close Roy Moore came to getting elected to the Senate and the large number of Republican Senators and Representatives who appear to have no interest whatsoever in enforcing the law, or even investigating potential violations of the Constitution. --BobEstonut wrote:You really didn't get that that was a joke?Bob78164 wrote:I think part of the reason Alabama is now represented by Senator Jones is that many of Alabama's voters didn't see it that way. That's why the race was close enough that the scandal could flip the seat.Estonut wrote:But perfect for a senator!
And you think I'm in favor of that?Bob78164 wrote:Too close to home, given how close Roy Moore came to getting elected to the Senate and the large number of Republican Senators and Representatives who appear to have no interest whatsoever in enforcing the law, or even investigating potential violations of the Constitution.Estonut wrote:You really didn't get that that was a joke?Bob78164 wrote:I think part of the reason Alabama is now represented by Senator Jones is that many of Alabama's voters didn't see it that way. That's why the race was close enough that the scandal could flip the seat.
Couldn't tell. Demographics suggested not (most California Republicans are sane and I'm not even sure you're a Republican), but I really don't think I know your political views with any confidence. As illustrated right here on the Bored, though, there are an awful lot of voters who feel exactly that way. (Devin Nunes apparently managed a huge fundraising haul -- his supporters' reward for being Donny's lap dog.) If that weren't the case, the aforementioned Senators and Representatives would be using their powers to investigate these issues. --BobEstonut wrote:And you think I'm in favor of that?Bob78164 wrote:Too close to home, given how close Roy Moore came to getting elected to the Senate and the large number of Republican Senators and Representatives who appear to have no interest whatsoever in enforcing the law, or even investigating potential violations of the Constitution.Estonut wrote:You really didn't get that that was a joke?