A home for the weary.
https://www.wwtbambored.com/
I didn't see Red Sparrow. Were there clones in it? Maria Butina, Anna Chapman and Yulia Skripal look astonishingly similar.silverscreenselect wrote:I'd also add that this story will have traction with the general public because Butera is rather striking looking and the social media "Red Sparrow" comparisons are already running rampant.
No clones. Just Jennifer Lawrence trained to be a spy. --Bobjarnon wrote:I didn't see Red Sparrow. Were there clones in it? Maria Butina, Anna Chapman and Yulia Skripal look astonishingly similar.silverscreenselect wrote:I'd also add that this story will have traction with the general public because Butera is rather striking looking and the social media "Red Sparrow" comparisons are already running rampant.
Spoiler
You really don't understand what that expression means, do you?Bob Juch wrote:You really are the king of whataboutism, aren't you?Estonut wrote:Oh, you mean like the classified documents that ended up on Wiener's laptop?silverscreenselect wrote:Here is the text of the actual statute, 18 U.S.C. Section 798:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/798
The next paragraph of the Act defines "classified information" as information that "at the time of a violation of this section, is, for reasons of national security, specifically designated by a United States Government Agency for limited or restricted dissemination or distribution"
So, to be a crime, the information must be classified by a government agency, must be knowingly and willfully transmitted, and must fall into one of the categories of information listed in this section. Once again, Flock's and other Hillary haters' "understanding" of the law is incorrect.
https://www.cnn.com/2017/12/29/politics ... index.html
What is it you think I ignored, jarnon?jarnon wrote:As I expected, Estonut and SSS ignored my explanation and are continuing to exchange the same meaningless talking points.
After I wrote my explanation, you quoted one of SSS’s earlier posts and brought up emails on Weiner’s laptop. The emails shouldn’t have been there, for other reasons. But any classified content was due to the carelessness of some State Dept. employee, not a crime by Abedin, Clinton or Weiner.Estonut wrote:What is it you think I ignored, jarnon?jarnon wrote:As I expected, Estonut and SSS ignored my explanation and are continuing to exchange the same meaningless talking points.
Estonut wrote:You really don't understand what that expression means, do you?Bob Juch wrote:You really are the king of whataboutism, aren't you?Estonut wrote:Oh, you mean like the classified documents that ended up on Wiener's laptop?
https://www.cnn.com/2017/12/29/politics ... index.html
More whataboutism.Beebs52 wrote:https://mobile.twitter.com/IranFail/sta ... 88/photo/1
Not at all. It's a stupid meme in response to your stupid memes. Diff is I never posted it during Obama's presidency.Bob Juch wrote:More whataboutism.Beebs52 wrote:https://mobile.twitter.com/IranFail/sta ... 88/photo/1
Bob, please knock it off. This doesn't add any actual information or understanding to the discussion. --BobBob Juch wrote:
Blake Hounshell Editor-in-Chief Politico Magazine 2/18 wrote:If, like me, you’ve been following every twist and turn of the Russia investigations, you’ve probably wrestled with the same question that has been gnawing at me for more than a year now: What if there’s nothing there?... I’m still waiting for a smoking gun—and the special counsel hasn’t shown us one yet, assuming he ever will.
Read the two articles together, and you can see what's happened.Blake Hounshell 7/18 wrote:When I wrote, back in February, that I was skeptical that President Donald Trump would ever be proved to have secretly colluded with Russia to sway the 2016 election in his favor, I mistyped. What I meant to write was that I wasn’t skeptical. Last week’s events have nullified my previous skepticism.... We might never get clear evidence that Trump made a secret deal with the Kremlin. It would be great to see his tax returns, and perhaps Mueller has evidence of private collusion that we have yet to see. These details matter. But in a larger sense, everything we need to know about Trump’s strange relationship with Russia is already out in the open. As The Donald himself might say, there’s something going on.
You're weird.Bob78164 wrote:Something else was recently pointed out. Compare the physically domineering handshakes Comrade Donny employs with other heads of state to how he treated and acted toward Putin. It's almost as though he were afraid of Putin. --Bob
Considering folks had died from skin contact with things from Russian sources, I'd probably be a bit hesitant, too.Beebs52 wrote:You're weird.Bob78164 wrote:Something else was recently pointed out. Compare the physically domineering handshakes Comrade Donny employs with other heads of state to how he treated and acted toward Putin. It's almost as though he were afraid of Putin. --Bob