WWTBAM Bored

A home for the weary.
It is currently Tue Aug 20, 2019 12:11 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 586 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 ... 24  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Apr 16, 2019 2:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 9:31 am
Posts: 6765
Location: Montana
Bob78164 wrote:
flockofseagulls104 wrote:
He found no evidence of collusion. NONE. after 2 years. . . .

Shut the fuck up already.
Cite, please. I know I haven't seen Mueller's report yet. Have you? I certainly won't rely on the "summary" of someone who has lied in the past when purporting to provide a "summary."

No attempt to defend Donny from Mueller's refusal to clear him of obstruction of justice?

And go fuck yourself. We won't be bullied. --Bob


:lol: :lol: :lol:

_________________
To argue with a person who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead. -Thomas Paine


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Apr 16, 2019 8:59 pm 
Offline
Director of Promos
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 6:42 pm
Posts: 4126
Location: Literary Circles
Tweet:

Quote:
I believe it will be Crazy Bernie Sanders vs. Sleepy Joe Biden as the two finalists to run against maybe the best Economy in the history of our Country (and MANY other great things)! I look forward to facing whoever it may be. May God Rest Their Soul!

_________________
Available now:
The Secret At Haney Field: A Baseball Mystery
The Right Hand Rule
Center Point
Dizzy Miss Lizzie
Running On Empty
The Tick Tock Man


Visit my website: http://www.rmclarkauthor.com

Looking for publisher love:
The Dragon's Song

Just finished:
Devin Drake and The Family Secret

Up Next:
Devin Drake and The Roller-Ghoster
Devin Drake and the Haunted Balcony


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Apr 16, 2019 9:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 8:07 pm
Posts: 4879
Location: Atlanta, GA
Bob78164 wrote:
flockofseagulls104 wrote:
He found no evidence of collusion. NONE. after 2 years. . . .

Shut the fuck up already.
Cite, please. I know I haven't seen Mueller's report yet. Have you? I certainly won't rely on the "summary" of someone who has lied in the past when purporting to provide a "summary."

No attempt to defend Donny from Mueller's refusal to clear him of obstruction of justice?

And go fuck yourself. We won't be bullied. --Bob

Hey, bob-tel, what evidence of obstruction do you allege? Comey? Didn't every dem in Congress call for his firing? How about all the fake news about Rosenstein and Muller in imminent danger of being fired? Were they? What did he or anyone else do to obstruct the investigation?

Tell us, bob-tel, how did trump obstruct justice?
(Oh, I don't know, I haven't read Mueller's report.)
No comment on 2 years of accusing the president of 'colluding' with Russia when your incorruptible Saint Mueller and his team of trump haters didn't find any evidence of it?
(Oh, Barr risked his name and reputation to lie about a report that many people know the contents of.)
You ARE insane, sir.

_________________
Your friendly neighborhood racist. On the waiting list to be a nazi. Designated an honorary 'snowflake'. Trolled by the very best, as well as by BJ.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Apr 17, 2019 1:10 am 
Offline
Bored Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:02 pm
Posts: 18457
Location: By the phone
flockofseagulls104 wrote:
Bob78164 wrote:
flockofseagulls104 wrote:
He found no evidence of collusion. NONE. after 2 years. . . .

Shut the fuck up already.
Cite, please. I know I haven't seen Mueller's report yet. Have you? I certainly won't rely on the "summary" of someone who has lied in the past when purporting to provide a "summary."

No attempt to defend Donny from Mueller's refusal to clear him of obstruction of justice?

And go fuck yourself. We won't be bullied. --Bob

Hey, bob-tel, what evidence of obstruction do you allege? Comey? Didn't every dem in Congress call for his firing? How about all the fake news about Rosenstein and Muller in imminent danger of being fired? Were they? What did he or anyone else do to obstruct the investigation?

Tell us, bob-tel, how did trump obstruct justice?
(Oh, I don't know, I haven't read Mueller's report.)
No comment on 2 years of accusing the president of 'colluding' with Russia when your incorruptible Saint Mueller and his team of trump haters didn't find any evidence of it?
(Oh, Barr risked his name and reputation to lie about a report that many people know the contents of.)
You ARE insane, sir.
You don’t know that Mueller found no evidence of a criminal conspiracy. If Barr is telling the truth, all you know is that there wasn’t enough evidence to charge him with a crime. Which is exactly the same thing Director Comey said about Secretary Clinton, yet I seem to recall a distinct lack of willingness to accept that conclusion.

You’re either an utter hypocrite or you’re willfully blinded by your Trump Fanboy Syndrome. You don’t care that Donny outed n in-place intelligence agent to a hostile foreign government. You don’t care that Donny is making no effort to protect our election process from another attack by hostile foreign government. All you care about is that this stuff is helping Republicans stay in power and blocking Democrats from power. And that is completely unAmerican. —Bob

_________________
"Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason than that of blindfolded fear." Thomas Jefferson


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Apr 17, 2019 6:17 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 8:07 pm
Posts: 4879
Location: Atlanta, GA
Bob78164 wrote:
flockofseagulls104 wrote:
Bob78164 wrote:
Cite, please. I know I haven't seen Mueller's report yet. Have you? I certainly won't rely on the "summary" of someone who has lied in the past when purporting to provide a "summary."

No attempt to defend Donny from Mueller's refusal to clear him of obstruction of justice?

And go fuck yourself. We won't be bullied. --Bob

Hey, bob-tel, what evidence of obstruction do you allege? Comey? Didn't every dem in Congress call for his firing? How about all the fake news about Rosenstein and Muller in imminent danger of being fired? Were they? What did he or anyone else do to obstruct the investigation?

Tell us, bob-tel, how did trump obstruct justice?
(Oh, I don't know, I haven't read Mueller's report.)
No comment on 2 years of accusing the president of 'colluding' with Russia when your incorruptible Saint Mueller and his team of trump haters didn't find any evidence of it?
(Oh, Barr risked his name and reputation to lie about a report that many people know the contents of.)
You ARE insane, sir.
You don’t know that Mueller found no evidence of a criminal conspiracy. If Barr is telling the truth, all you know is that there wasn’t enough evidence to charge him with a crime. Which is exactly the same thing Director Comey said about Secretary Clinton, yet I seem to recall a distinct lack of willingness to accept that conclusion.

You’re either an utter hypocrite or you’re willfully blinded by your Trump Fanboy Syndrome. You don’t care that Donny outed n in-place intelligence agent to a hostile foreign government. You don’t care that Donny is making no effort to protect our election process from another attack by hostile foreign government. All you care about is that this stuff is helping Republicans stay in power and blocking Democrats from power. And that is completely unAmerican. —Bob

Wow. Just wow.

_________________
Your friendly neighborhood racist. On the waiting list to be a nazi. Designated an honorary 'snowflake'. Trolled by the very best, as well as by BJ.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Apr 17, 2019 6:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:43 pm
Posts: 10672
Location: In Texas of course!
Bob78164 wrote:
You don’t know that Mueller found no evidence of a criminal conspiracy. If Barr is telling the truth, all you know is that there wasn’t enough evidence to charge him with a crime. Which is exactly the same thing Director Comey said about Secretary Clinton, yet I seem to recall a distinct lack of willingness to accept that conclusion.



Not even close to the same thing Comey said about Clinton. He said there WAS a crime but it wasn't intentional (which we all no is not a defense, for others anyway).

_________________
In the end, they will all pretty much taste the same.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Apr 17, 2019 6:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 8:07 pm
Posts: 4879
Location: Atlanta, GA
flockofseagulls104 wrote:
Bob78164 wrote:
flockofseagulls104 wrote:
Hey, bob-tel, what evidence of obstruction do you allege? Comey? Didn't every dem in Congress call for his firing? How about all the fake news about Rosenstein and Muller in imminent danger of being fired? Were they? What did he or anyone else do to obstruct the investigation?

Tell us, bob-tel, how did trump obstruct justice?
(Oh, I don't know, I haven't read Mueller's report.)
No comment on 2 years of accusing the president of 'colluding' with Russia when your incorruptible Saint Mueller and his team of trump haters didn't find any evidence of it?
(Oh, Barr risked his name and reputation to lie about a report that many people know the contents of.)
You ARE insane, sir.
You don’t know that Mueller found no evidence of a criminal conspiracy. If Barr is telling the truth, all you know is that there wasn’t enough evidence to charge him with a crime. Which is exactly the same thing Director Comey said about Secretary Clinton, yet I seem to recall a distinct lack of willingness to accept that conclusion.

You’re either an utter hypocrite or you’re willfully blinded by your Trump Fanboy Syndrome. You don’t care that Donny outed n in-place intelligence agent to a hostile foreign government. You don’t care that Donny is making no effort to protect our election process from another attack by hostile foreign government. All you care about is that this stuff is helping Republicans stay in power and blocking Democrats from power. And that is completely unAmerican. —Bob

Wow. Just wow.

Actually, the only thing you said above that has any relation to the truth is I want to block dems from having any power. The repubs aren't much better. What I want is for the federal government to shrink, stop spending our money on worthless endeavors and stick to doing only what they are supposed to do, like securing our border and protecting it's citizens.

_________________
Your friendly neighborhood racist. On the waiting list to be a nazi. Designated an honorary 'snowflake'. Trolled by the very best, as well as by BJ.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Apr 17, 2019 6:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 8:07 pm
Posts: 4879
Location: Atlanta, GA
flockofseagulls104 wrote:
Bob78164 wrote:
flockofseagulls104 wrote:
Hey, bob-tel, what evidence of obstruction do you allege? Comey? Didn't every dem in Congress call for his firing? How about all the fake news about Rosenstein and Muller in imminent danger of being fired? Were they? What did he or anyone else do to obstruct the investigation?

Tell us, bob-tel, how did trump obstruct justice?
(Oh, I don't know, I haven't read Mueller's report.)
No comment on 2 years of accusing the president of 'colluding' with Russia when your incorruptible Saint Mueller and his team of trump haters didn't find any evidence of it?
(Oh, Barr risked his name and reputation to lie about a report that many people know the contents of.)
You ARE insane, sir.
You don’t know that Mueller found no evidence of a criminal conspiracy. If Barr is telling the truth, all you know is that there wasn’t enough evidence to charge him with a crime. Which is exactly the same thing Director Comey said about Secretary Clinton, yet I seem to recall a distinct lack of willingness to accept that conclusion.

You’re either an utter hypocrite or you’re willfully blinded by your Trump Fanboy Syndrome. You don’t care that Donny outed n in-place intelligence agent to a hostile foreign government. You don’t care that Donny is making no effort to protect our election process from another attack by hostile foreign government. All you care about is that this stuff is helping Republicans stay in power and blocking Democrats from power. And that is completely unAmerican. —Bob

Wow. Just wow.

Actually, the only thing you said above that has any relation to the truth is I want to block dems from having any power. The repubs aren't much better. What I want is for the federal government to shrink, stop spending our money on worthless endeavors and stick to doing only what they are supposed to do, like securing our border and protecting it's citizens.

duplicate submission, but it's worth saying twice.

_________________
Your friendly neighborhood racist. On the waiting list to be a nazi. Designated an honorary 'snowflake'. Trolled by the very best, as well as by BJ.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Apr 17, 2019 9:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:21 pm
Posts: 16698
flockofseagulls104 wrote:
What I want is for the federal government to shrink, stop spending our money on worthless endeavors.


Worthless endeavors = Building a wall

_________________
Check out our website: http://www.silverscreenvideos.com


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Apr 17, 2019 11:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 8:07 pm
Posts: 4879
Location: Atlanta, GA
silverscreenselect wrote:
flockofseagulls104 wrote:
What I want is for the federal government to shrink, stop spending our money on worthless endeavors.


Worthless endeavors = Building a wall

Maybe, but it's a thousand times more effective than what congress is doing. Ie: NOTHING,

_________________
Your friendly neighborhood racist. On the waiting list to be a nazi. Designated an honorary 'snowflake'. Trolled by the very best, as well as by BJ.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Apr 18, 2019 5:26 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:15 pm
Posts: 721
Location: Skipperville, Tx.
Should be a very interesting day.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Apr 18, 2019 5:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:21 pm
Posts: 16698
flockofseagulls104 wrote:
silverscreenselect wrote:
flockofseagulls104 wrote:
What I want is for the federal government to shrink, stop spending our money on worthless endeavors.


Worthless endeavors = Building a wall

Maybe, but it's a thousand times more effective than what congress is doing. Ie: NOTHING,


And a million times more expensive.

_________________
Check out our website: http://www.silverscreenvideos.com


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Apr 18, 2019 6:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:43 pm
Posts: 10672
Location: In Texas of course!
silverscreenselect wrote:
flockofseagulls104 wrote:
silverscreenselect wrote:

Worthless endeavors = Building a wall

Maybe, but it's a thousand times more effective than what congress is doing. Ie: NOTHING,


And a million times more expensive.


$5 billion / 1 million = $5,000
$5,000 / 435 = $11.49 each

That's about what they're worth, but they are spending way more than that.

_________________
In the end, they will all pretty much taste the same.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Apr 18, 2019 8:25 am 
Offline
Director of Promos
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 6:42 pm
Posts: 4126
Location: Literary Circles
Tweeted:


Image

_________________
Available now:
The Secret At Haney Field: A Baseball Mystery
The Right Hand Rule
Center Point
Dizzy Miss Lizzie
Running On Empty
The Tick Tock Man


Visit my website: http://www.rmclarkauthor.com

Looking for publisher love:
The Dragon's Song

Just finished:
Devin Drake and The Family Secret

Up Next:
Devin Drake and The Roller-Ghoster
Devin Drake and the Haunted Balcony


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Apr 18, 2019 1:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:21 pm
Posts: 16698
silverscreenselect wrote:
flockofseagulls104 wrote:

They spend almost 2 years and millions of our dollars and found NOTHING.


Since we haven't seen the report, we don't know just what he found.


Sure looks like they found plenty of nothing.

_________________
Check out our website: http://www.silverscreenvideos.com


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Apr 18, 2019 3:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:43 pm
Posts: 10672
Location: In Texas of course!
silverscreenselect wrote:
silverscreenselect wrote:
flockofseagulls104 wrote:

They spend almost 2 years and millions of our dollars and found NOTHING.


Since we haven't seen the report, we don't know just what he found.


Sure looks like they found plenty of nothing.


Exactly. Nothing.

_________________
In the end, they will all pretty much taste the same.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Apr 18, 2019 8:49 pm 
Offline
Bored Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:02 pm
Posts: 18457
Location: By the phone
BackInTex wrote:
silverscreenselect wrote:
silverscreenselect wrote:

Since we haven't seen the report, we don't know just what he found.


Sure looks like they found plenty of nothing.


Exactly. Nothing.
Hundreds of pages of “nothing” and an express refusal to exonerate Donny of criminal conduct. This leaves the door wide open to indict him for obstruction of justice after he leaves office, one way or another.

I’m still in transit so I haven’t yet had the chance to do more than skim the redacted report. Mueller’s frequent use of what lawyers refer to as a “negative pregnant” is notable and I’d be very surprised if it’s accidental. —Bob

_________________
"Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason than that of blindfolded fear." Thomas Jefferson


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Apr 19, 2019 1:59 am 
Offline
Evil Genius
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 1:16 am
Posts: 9669
Location: Garden Grove, CA
Bob78164 wrote:
BackInTex wrote:
silverscreenselect wrote:
Sure looks like they found plenty of nothing.
Exactly. Nothing.
Hundreds of pages of “nothing” and an express refusal to exonerate Donny of criminal conduct. This leaves the door wide open to indict him for obstruction of justice after he leaves office, one way or another.

I’m still in transit so I haven’t yet had the chance to do more than skim the redacted report. Mueller’s frequent use of what lawyers refer to as a “negative pregnant” is notable and I’d be very surprised if it’s accidental.
Impressive how much you "know" without actually having read it.

_________________
A child of five would understand this. Send someone to fetch a child of five.
Groucho Marx


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Apr 19, 2019 10:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 9:52 pm
Posts: 4815
Location: Merion, Pa.
Donald J. Trump wrote:
Statements are made about me by certain people in the Crazy Mueller Report, in itself written by 18 Angry Democrat Trump Haters, which are fabricated & totally untrue. Watch out for people that take so-called “notes,” when the notes never existed until needed. Because I never agreed to testify, it was not necessary for me to respond to statements made in the “Report” about me, some of which are total bullshit & only given to make the other person look good (or me to look bad). This was an Illegally Started Hoax that never should have happened, a...

(6½ hours later)

....big, fat, waste of time, energy and money - $30,000,000 to be exact. It is now finally time to turn the tables and bring justice to some very sick and dangerous people who have committed very serious crimes, perhaps even Spying or Treason. This should never happen again!


Last edited by jarnon on Fri Apr 19, 2019 5:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Apr 19, 2019 10:56 am 
Offline
Bored Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:02 pm
Posts: 18457
Location: By the phone
Estonut wrote:
Bob78164 wrote:
BackInTex wrote:
Exactly. Nothing.
Hundreds of pages of “nothing” and an express refusal to exonerate Donny of criminal conduct. This leaves the door wide open to indict him for obstruction of justice after he leaves office, one way or another.

I’m still in transit so I haven’t yet had the chance to do more than skim the redacted report. Mueller’s frequent use of what lawyers refer to as a “negative pregnant” is notable and I’d be very surprised if it’s accidental.
Impressive how much you "know" without actually having read it.
But not as impressive as how much Congressional Republicans will refuse to know even after reading the Report. —Bob

_________________
"Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason than that of blindfolded fear." Thomas Jefferson


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Apr 19, 2019 11:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 9:31 am
Posts: 6765
Location: Montana
Bob78164 wrote:
Estonut wrote:
Bob78164 wrote:
Hundreds of pages of “nothing” and an express refusal to exonerate Donny of criminal conduct. This leaves the door wide open to indict him for obstruction of justice after he leaves office, one way or another.

I’m still in transit so I haven’t yet had the chance to do more than skim the redacted report. Mueller’s frequent use of what lawyers refer to as a “negative pregnant” is notable and I’d be very surprised if it’s accidental.
Impressive how much you "know" without actually having read it.
But not as impressive as how much Congressional Republicans will refuse to know even after reading the Report. —Bob


LOL! Being prescient again, are we? Precious!

_________________
To argue with a person who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead. -Thomas Paine


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Apr 19, 2019 12:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 8:07 pm
Posts: 4879
Location: Atlanta, GA
Bob78164 wrote:
Estonut wrote:
Bob78164 wrote:
Hundreds of pages of “nothing” and an express refusal to exonerate Donny of criminal conduct. This leaves the door wide open to indict him for obstruction of justice after he leaves office, one way or another.

I’m still in transit so I haven’t yet had the chance to do more than skim the redacted report. Mueller’s frequent use of what lawyers refer to as a “negative pregnant” is notable and I’d be very surprised if it’s accidental.
Impressive how much you "know" without actually having read it.
But not as impressive as how much Congressional Republicans will refuse to know even after reading the Report. —Bob

I know it's falling on deaf ears, but your mob has had 2 fucking years with unlimited resources, no hiding behind ANY calls for executive privilege, with a group of lawyers who can be fairly categorized as not being avid trump supporters. They investigated every little nook and cranny, while you waited with bated breath for the prosecutor to finally pronounce his sentences to jail every one of trump's associates.

It didn't happen. Now you want to use what the prosecutor found not sufficient to charge anyone to conduct your own one sided monkey trial in congress and in the press, not caring who you damage or hurt, without any pretense of honoring the concept of 'innocent until proven guilty'. A prosecutor does not determine a verdict. A prosecutor compiles what evidence there is to determine whether to press charges on a specific matter. Where is the DEFENSE side? What the hell kind of lawyer are you, bob-tel? Since when does a prosecutor get to 'exonerate' anyone? Why do we use the phrase 'Not Guilty' in a courtroom instead of 'Innocent'? Can you tell me that, bob-tel? Hint: because the accused IS innocent until PROVEN guilty. The burden of proof is on the prosecution. They don't get to decide the verdict, bob-tel. Didn't they teach you that in the Acme Law School for the Self-Righteous Illiterate? And in this case, the prosecution determined they didn't even have enough evidence to charge anyone with the crimes you so firmly believe trump is guilty of. No convoluted reading of a political scribe (another thing a prosecutor isn't supposed to do) will change the FACT that he hasn't been charged with obstructing an investigation where no basis for a crime was established in the first place.
Just STOP and tell your dem friends that trump is the president, stop trying to remove him from that office and do some work that will benefit the damn country for a change.

_________________
Your friendly neighborhood racist. On the waiting list to be a nazi. Designated an honorary 'snowflake'. Trolled by the very best, as well as by BJ.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Apr 19, 2019 1:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:21 pm
Posts: 16698
flockofseagulls104 wrote:
Bob78164 wrote:
Estonut wrote:
Impressive how much you "know" without actually having read it.
But not as impressive as how much Congressional Republicans will refuse to know even after reading the Report. —Bob

I know it's falling on deaf ears, but your mob has had 2 fucking years with unlimited resources, no hiding behind ANY calls for executive privilege, with a group of lawyers who can be fairly categorized as not being avid trump supporters. They investigated every little nook and cranny, while you waited with bated breath for the prosecutor to finally pronounce his sentences to jail every one of trump's associates.

It didn't happen. Now you want to use what the prosecutor found not sufficient to charge anyone to conduct your own one sided monkey trial in congress and in the press, not caring who you damage or hurt, without any pretense of honoring the concept of 'innocent until proven guilty'. A prosecutor does not determine a verdict. A prosecutor compiles what evidence there is to determine whether to press charges on a specific matter. Where is the DEFENSE side? What the hell kind of lawyer are you, bob-tel? Since when does a prosecutor get to 'exonerate' anyone? Why do we use the phrase 'Not Guilty' in a courtroom instead of 'Innocent'? Can you tell me that, bob-tel? Hint: because the accused IS innocent until PROVEN guilty. The burden of proof is on the prosecution. They don't get to decide the verdict, bob-tel. Didn't they teach you that in the Acme Law School for the Self-Righteous Illiterate? And in this case, the prosecution determined they didn't even have enough evidence to charge anyone with the crimes you so firmly believe trump is guilty of. No convoluted reading of a political scribe (another thing a prosecutor isn't supposed to do) will change the FACT that he hasn't been charged with obstructing an investigation where no basis for a crime was established in the first place.
Just STOP and tell your dem friends that trump is the president, stop trying to remove him from that office and do some work that will benefit the damn country for a change.


How much of our Georgia moonshine have you been guzzling Flock?

_________________
Check out our website: http://www.silverscreenvideos.com


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Apr 19, 2019 2:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 8:07 pm
Posts: 4879
Location: Atlanta, GA
silverscreenselect wrote:
flockofseagulls104 wrote:
Bob78164 wrote:
But not as impressive as how much Congressional Republicans will refuse to know even after reading the Report. —Bob

I know it's falling on deaf ears, but your mob has had 2 fucking years with unlimited resources, no hiding behind ANY calls for executive privilege, with a group of lawyers who can be fairly categorized as not being avid trump supporters. They investigated every little nook and cranny, while you waited with bated breath for the prosecutor to finally pronounce his sentences to jail every one of trump's associates.

It didn't happen. Now you want to use what the prosecutor found not sufficient to charge anyone to conduct your own one sided monkey trial in congress and in the press, not caring who you damage or hurt, without any pretense of honoring the concept of 'innocent until proven guilty'. A prosecutor does not determine a verdict. A prosecutor compiles what evidence there is to determine whether to press charges on a specific matter. Where is the DEFENSE side? What the hell kind of lawyer are you, bob-tel? Since when does a prosecutor get to 'exonerate' anyone? Why do we use the phrase 'Not Guilty' in a courtroom instead of 'Innocent'? Can you tell me that, bob-tel? Hint: because the accused IS innocent until PROVEN guilty. The burden of proof is on the prosecution. They don't get to decide the verdict, bob-tel. Didn't they teach you that in the Acme Law School for the Self-Righteous Illiterate? And in this case, the prosecution determined they didn't even have enough evidence to charge anyone with the crimes you so firmly believe trump is guilty of. No convoluted reading of a political scribe (another thing a prosecutor isn't supposed to do) will change the FACT that he hasn't been charged with obstructing an investigation where no basis for a crime was established in the first place.
Just STOP and tell your dem friends that trump is the president, stop trying to remove him from that office and do some work that will benefit the damn country for a change.


How much of our Georgia moonshine have you been guzzling Flock?


No answer, just a juvenile swipe at me. As always.

_________________
Your friendly neighborhood racist. On the waiting list to be a nazi. Designated an honorary 'snowflake'. Trolled by the very best, as well as by BJ.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Apr 19, 2019 6:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 6:37 pm
Posts: 7396
Location: South Carolina
SEEN ON FACEBOOK: “Democrats lost an election they rigged, and now Democrats have lost an investigation they rigged.”

_________________
Suitguy is not bitter.

feels he represents the many educated and rational onlookers who believe that the hysterical denouncement of lay scepticism is both unwarranted and counter-productive

The problem, then, is that such calls do not address an opposition audience so much as they signal virtue. They talk past those who need convincing. They ignore actual facts and counterargument. And they are irreparably smug.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 586 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 ... 24  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Americanized by Maël Soucaze.