WWTBAM Bored

flockofseagulls104 wrote:

It didn't happen. Now you want to use what the prosecutor found not sufficient to charge anyone to conduct your own one sided monkey trial in congress and in the press, not caring who you damage or hurt, without any pretense of honoring the concept of 'innocent until proven guilty'.

I am sickened and the extent and pervasiveness of dishonesty and misdirection by individuals in the highest office of the land, including the President," I am also appalled that, among other things," fellow citizens working in a campaign for the president welcomed help from Russia — including information that had been illegally obtained."

flockofseagulls104 wrote:

Bob78164 wrote:

Estonut wrote:Impressive how much you "know" without actually having read it.

But not as impressive as how much Congressional Republicans will refuse to know even after reading the Report.

I know it's falling on deaf ears, but your mob has had 2 fucking years with unlimited resources, no hiding behind ANY calls for executive privilege, with a group of lawyers who can be fairly categorized as not being avid trump supporters. They investigated every little nook and cranny, while you waited with bated breath for the prosecutor to finally pronounce his sentences to jail every one of trump's associates.

It didn't happen. Now you want to use what the prosecutor found not sufficient to charge anyone to conduct your own one sided monkey trial in congress and in the press, not caring who you damage or hurt, without any pretense of honoring the concept of 'innocent until proven guilty'. A prosecutor does not determine a verdict. A prosecutor compiles what evidence there is to determine whether to press charges on a specific matter. Where is the DEFENSE side? What the hell kind of lawyer are you, bob-tel? Since when does a prosecutor get to 'exonerate' anyone? Why do we use the phrase 'Not Guilty' in a courtroom instead of 'Innocent'? Can you tell me that, bob-tel? Hint: because the accused IS innocent until PROVEN guilty. The burden of proof is on the prosecution. They don't get to decide the verdict, bob-tel. Didn't they teach you that in the Acme Law School for the Self-Righteous Illiterate? And in this case, the prosecution determined they didn't even have enough evidence to charge anyone with the crimes you so firmly believe trump is guilty of. No convoluted reading of a political scribe (another thing a prosecutor isn't supposed to do) will change the FACT that he hasn't been charged with obstructing an investigation where no basis for a crime was established in the first place.
Just STOP and tell your dem friends that trump is the president, stop trying to remove him from that office and do some work that will benefit the damn country for a change.

silverscreenselect wrote:

flockofseagulls104 wrote:

It didn't happen. Now you want to use what the prosecutor found not sufficient to charge anyone to conduct your own one sided monkey trial in congress and in the press, not caring who you damage or hurt, without any pretense of honoring the concept of 'innocent until proven guilty'.

Even Mitt Romney disagrees with your assessment about Trump's conduct.

I am sickened and the extent and pervasiveness of dishonesty and misdirection by individuals in the highest office of the land, including the President," I am also appalled that, among other things," fellow citizens working in a campaign for the president welcomed help from Russia — including information that had been illegally obtained."

If you weren't so in the tank for Trump, you'd stop to consider some of what came out and whether that's the type of conduct that you want from your President. Or like most Republicans, you don't care as long as you win.

flockofseagulls104 wrote: I am not 'In the tank' for any politician. I am against the democrats, who are 150% more corrupt, intellectually and morally bankrupt than the repubs, who are no paragons themselves.

silverscreenselect wrote:

flockofseagulls104 wrote: I am not 'In the tank' for any politician. I am against the democrats, who are 150% more corrupt, intellectually and morally bankrupt than the repubs, who are no paragons themselves.

If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck....

You may say you're not in the tank for Trump but you parrot (interesting how you accuse me of that) all the standard right-wing lines. You engage in some sort of warped logic process that Trump's misdeeds and his advisors' misdeeds weren't "proven" but there are 400 pages worth of findings, even in Barr's redacted version. And by the way, those findings to a significant extent corroborate what the "fake news" has been reporting for the past two years. The news got it right.

But the Democrats are worse because .... Hillary's e-mails, I guess. As far as the Democrats having no policy, you must have missed the measures that the Democrats have passed already in the House (which will rot because Mitch McConnell won't consider them). What are the Republican policies other than "build the wall"? Where's their idea for health care? We won't see that until 2021 if ever. Their only policies are to do what it takes to win elections by any means, fair or foul.

silverscreenselect wrote:

flockofseagulls104 wrote: I am not 'In the tank' for any politician. I am against the democrats, who are 150% more corrupt, intellectually and morally bankrupt than the repubs, who are no paragons themselves.

If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck....

You may say you're not in the tank for Trump but you parrot (interesting how you accuse me of that) all the standard right-wing lines. You engage in some sort of warped logic process that Trump's misdeeds and his advisors' misdeeds weren't "proven" but there are 400 pages worth of findings, even in Barr's redacted version. And by the way, those findings to a significant extent corroborate what the "fake news" has been reporting for the past two years. The news got it right.

But the Democrats are worse because .... Hillary's e-mails, I guess. As far as the Democrats having no policy, you must have missed the measures that the Democrats have passed already in the House (which will rot because Mitch McConnell won't consider them). What are the Republican policies other than "build the wall"? Where's their idea for health care? We won't see that until 2021 if ever. Their only policies are to do what it takes to win elections by any means, fair or foul.

Bob78164 wrote:

silverscreenselect wrote:

flockofseagulls104 wrote: I am not 'In the tank' for any politician. I am against the democrats, who are 150% more corrupt, intellectually and morally bankrupt than the repubs, who are no paragons themselves.

If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck....

You may say you're not in the tank for Trump but you parrot (interesting how you accuse me of that) all the standard right-wing lines. You engage in some sort of warped logic process that Trump's misdeeds and his advisors' misdeeds weren't "proven" but there are 400 pages worth of findings, even in Barr's redacted version. And by the way, those findings to a significant extent corroborate what the "fake news" has been reporting for the past two years. The news got it right.

But the Democrats are worse because .... Hillary's e-mails, I guess. As far as the Democrats having no policy, you must have missed the measures that the Democrats have passed already in the House (which will rot because Mitch McConnell won't consider them). What are the Republican policies other than "build the wall"? Where's their idea for health care? We won't see that until 2021 if ever. Their only policies are to do what it takes to win elections by any means, fair or foul.

It’s hard to blame someone who uses Fox “News” as his primary source of propaganda for not knowing what’s going on in the real world. Anyone who reads the report will know the truth. I just hope there are enough Americans who are willing to do their homework. —Bob

flockofseagulls104 wrote:

Bob78164 wrote:

Estonut wrote:Impressive how much you "know" without actually having read it.

But not as impressive as how much Congressional Republicans will refuse to know even after reading the Report. —Bob

I know it's falling on deaf ears, but your mob has had 2 fucking years with unlimited resources, no hiding behind ANY calls for executive privilege, with a group of lawyers who can be fairly categorized as not being avid trump supporters. They investigated every little nook and cranny, while you waited with bated breath for the prosecutor to finally pronounce his sentences to jail every one of trump's associates.

It didn't happen. Now you want to use what the prosecutor found not sufficient to charge anyone to conduct your own one sided monkey trial in congress and in the press, not caring who you damage or hurt, without any pretense of honoring the concept of 'innocent until proven guilty'. A prosecutor does not determine a verdict. A prosecutor compiles what evidence there is to determine whether to press charges on a specific matter. Where is the DEFENSE side? What the hell kind of lawyer are you, bob-tel? Since when does a prosecutor get to 'exonerate' anyone? Why do we use the phrase 'Not Guilty' in a courtroom instead of 'Innocent'? Can you tell me that, bob-tel? Hint: because the accused IS innocent until PROVEN guilty. The burden of proof is on the prosecution. They don't get to decide the verdict, bob-tel. Didn't they teach you that in the Acme Law School for the Self-Righteous Illiterate? And in this case, the prosecution determined they didn't even have enough evidence to charge anyone with the crimes you so firmly believe trump is guilty of. No convoluted reading of a political scribe (another thing a prosecutor isn't supposed to do) will change the FACT that he hasn't been charged with obstructing an investigation where no basis for a crime was established in the first place.
Just STOP and tell your dem friends that trump is the president, stop trying to remove him from that office and do some work that will benefit the damn country for a change.

wbtravis007 wrote:

flockofseagulls104 wrote:

Bob78164 wrote:But not as impressive as how much Congressional Republicans will refuse to know even after reading the Report. —Bob

I know it's falling on deaf ears, but your mob has had 2 fucking years with unlimited resources, no hiding behind ANY calls for executive privilege, with a group of lawyers who can be fairly categorized as not being avid trump supporters. They investigated every little nook and cranny, while you waited with bated breath for the prosecutor to finally pronounce his sentences to jail every one of trump's associates.

It didn't happen. Now you want to use what the prosecutor found not sufficient to charge anyone to conduct your own one sided monkey trial in congress and in the press, not caring who you damage or hurt, without any pretense of honoring the concept of 'innocent until proven guilty'. A prosecutor does not determine a verdict. A prosecutor compiles what evidence there is to determine whether to press charges on a specific matter. Where is the DEFENSE side? What the hell kind of lawyer are you, bob-tel? Since when does a prosecutor get to 'exonerate' anyone? Why do we use the phrase 'Not Guilty' in a courtroom instead of 'Innocent'? Can you tell me that, bob-tel? Hint: because the accused IS innocent until PROVEN guilty. The burden of proof is on the prosecution. They don't get to decide the verdict, bob-tel. Didn't they teach you that in the Acme Law School for the Self-Righteous Illiterate? And in this case, the prosecution determined they didn't even have enough evidence to charge anyone with the crimes you so firmly believe trump is guilty of. No convoluted reading of a political scribe (another thing a prosecutor isn't supposed to do) will change the FACT that he hasn't been charged with obstructing an investigation where no basis for a crime was established in the first place.
Just STOP and tell your dem friends that trump is the president, stop trying to remove him from that office and do some work that will benefit the damn country for a change.

When I read this and so many of your other comments before and after I've been reminded of "someone" who is definitely on my Mount Rushmore of favorite posters here. I wouldn't presume to know what his response would be and only mention him to attribute to him a paraphrasing of, if not a direct quotation of, my recollection of what he once said to you (or maybe to someone else, but I'm pretty sure it was you):

You are frothing.

Seek help.

Vandal wrote:From Twitter:

Trump was asked during a local Minnesota interview last week about the source of one of his numbers.

Vandal wrote:From Twitter:

Trump was asked during a local Minnesota interview last week about the source of one of his numbers.

Vandal wrote:Deleted tweet:

I wonder if the New York Times will apologize to me a second time, as they did after the 2016 Election. But this one will have to be a far bigger & better apology. On this one they will have to get down on their knees & beg for forgiveness-they are truly the Enemy of the People!

“President Donald J. Trump is the greatest hostage negotiator that I know of in the history of the United States. 20 hostages, many in impossible circumstances, have been released in last two years. No money was paid.” Cheif Hostage Negotiator, USA!

Saturday night, is there any place that's more fun than a Trump Rally? Can you imagine Sleepy Joe, Crazy Bernie? You look at the candidates, right? I think Pocahontas, she's finished, she's out. She's gone.

The baby is born, the mother meets w/the doctor. They take care of the baby. They wrap the baby beautifully. Then the doctor and mother determine whether or not they will execute the baby

Vandal wrote:Baylor women's basketball team visit the White House:

silverscreenselect wrote:

Vandal wrote:Baylor women's basketball team visit the White House:

I've seen happier expressions on the faces of death row prisoners.

silverscreenselect wrote:

Vandal wrote:Baylor women's basketball team visit the White House:

I've seen happier expressions on the faces of death row prisoners.

Why didn’t President Obama do something about Russia in September (before November Election) when told by the FBI? He did NOTHING, and had no intention of doing anything!