Peter Strzok FINALLY fired

The forum for general posting. Come join the madness. :)
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
flockofseagulls104
Posts: 7742
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 8:07 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Peter Strzok FINALLY fired

#1 Post by flockofseagulls104 » Mon Aug 13, 2018 9:40 am

Your friendly neighborhood racist. On the waiting list to be a nazi. Designated an honorary 'snowflake'. Trolled by the very best, as well as by BJ. Always typical, unlike others.., Fulminator, Hopelessly in the tank for trump... inappropriate... Flocking himself... Probably a tucking sexist, too... All thought comes from the right wing noise machine(TM)... A clear and present threat to The Future Of Our Democracy.. Doesn't understand anything... Made the trump apologist and enabler playoffs... Heathen bastard... Knows nothing about history... Liar.... don't know much about statistics and polling... Nothing at all about biology... Ignorant Bigot... Potential Future Pariah... Big Nerd... Spiraling, Anti-Trans Bigot.. A Lunatic AND a Bigot.. Very Ignorant of the World in General... Sounds deranged... Fake Christian... Weird... has the mind of a child... has paranoid delusions... Simpleton

User avatar
Bob78164
Bored Moderator
Posts: 21626
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:02 pm
Location: By the phone

Re: Peter Strzok FINALLY fired

#2 Post by Bob78164 » Mon Aug 13, 2018 10:23 am

As I mentioned earlier, I don’t care whether investigators have political views. That’s inevitable. I do care when investigators allow their political views to affect their decision making.

And it looks like that’s the case with the decision to fire Strzok. My understanding is that the FBI’s professional responsibility unit recommended a suspension but that the Deputy Director, a political appointee, overruled the recommendation. It sounds to me like a reprisal for anti-Donny views.

So there are three questions that need answering. First, what were the grounds for firing Strzok? Second, how has the FBI historically treated similar issues? Third, what process was used to make the decision?

Under the circumstances, a Congessional investigation is obviously appropriate. But the current head of the House Oversight Committee sees it as his job to protect the President, and that obviously makes him incapable of doing his job. The only way to fix that problem is to install a different Chair, one who understands the difference between oversight and cheerleading, and that will require a Democratic majority in the House. I’ll take one in the Senate as well. —Bob
"Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason than that of blindfolded fear." Thomas Jefferson

User avatar
Bob Juch
Posts: 26427
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:58 am
Location: Oro Valley, Arizona
Contact:

Re: Peter Strzok FINALLY fired

#3 Post by Bob Juch » Mon Aug 13, 2018 10:55 am

Bob78164 wrote:As I mentioned earlier, I don’t care whether investigators have political views. That’s inevitable. I do care when investigators allow their political views to affect their decision making.

And it looks like that’s the case with the decision to fire Strzok. My understanding is that the FBI’s professional responsibility unit recommended a suspension but that the Deputy Director, a political appointee, overruled the recommendation. It sounds to me like a reprisal for anti-Donny views.

So there are three questions that need answering. First, what were the grounds for firing Strzok? Second, how has the FBI historically treated similar issues? Third, what process was used to make the decision?

Under the circumstances, a Congressional investigation is obviously appropriate. But the current head of the House Oversight Committee sees it as his job to protect the President, and that obviously makes him incapable of doing his job. The only way to fix that problem is to install a different Chair, one who understands the difference between oversight and cheerleading, and that will require a Democratic majority in the House. I’ll take one in the Senate as well. —Bob
That committee has made a lot of oversights.
I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I needed to be.
- Douglas Adams (1952 - 2001)

Si fractum non sit, noli id reficere.

Teach a child to be polite and courteous in the home and, when he grows up, he'll never be able to drive in New Jersey.

User avatar
silverscreenselect
Posts: 23174
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:21 pm
Contact:

Re: Peter Strzok FINALLY fired

#4 Post by silverscreenselect » Mon Aug 13, 2018 10:56 am

I'm just waiting on the Republicans in Congress to demand an investigation of those FBI agents that Rudy Giuliani admits fed him information.

Or how about checking the texts and e-mails of every agent investigating Hillary over the years to see signs of anti-Hillary bias.

And waiting. And waiting. And waiting.
Check out our website: http://www.silverscreenvideos.com

User avatar
flockofseagulls104
Posts: 7742
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 8:07 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: Peter Strzok FINALLY fired

#5 Post by flockofseagulls104 » Mon Aug 13, 2018 12:36 pm

Bob78164 wrote:As I mentioned earlier, I don’t care whether investigators have political views. That’s inevitable. I do care when investigators allow their political views to affect their decision making.

And it looks like that’s the case with the decision to fire Strzok. My understanding is that the FBI’s professional responsibility unit recommended a suspension but that the Deputy Director, a political appointee, overruled the recommendation. It sounds to me like a reprisal for anti-Donny views.

So there are three questions that need answering. First, what were the grounds for firing Strzok? Second, how has the FBI historically treated similar issues? Third, what process was used to make the decision?

Under the circumstances, a Congessional investigation is obviously appropriate. But the current head of the House Oversight Committee sees it as his job to protect the President, and that obviously makes him incapable of doing his job. The only way to fix that problem is to install a different Chair, one who understands the difference between oversight and cheerleading, and that will require a Democratic majority in the House. I’ll take one in the Senate as well. —Bob
Wow, the lengths you will go to justify your hypocrisy is astounding. Strzok didn't allow his STRONG bias to affect his decisions, even though there are emails that strongly suggest he did. Just the fact that he shared these prejudices with his mistress would be grounds for firing in the private sector. But the decision to fire him for that was a dastardly deed. And, so, we need yet another investigation.
Your friendly neighborhood racist. On the waiting list to be a nazi. Designated an honorary 'snowflake'. Trolled by the very best, as well as by BJ. Always typical, unlike others.., Fulminator, Hopelessly in the tank for trump... inappropriate... Flocking himself... Probably a tucking sexist, too... All thought comes from the right wing noise machine(TM)... A clear and present threat to The Future Of Our Democracy.. Doesn't understand anything... Made the trump apologist and enabler playoffs... Heathen bastard... Knows nothing about history... Liar.... don't know much about statistics and polling... Nothing at all about biology... Ignorant Bigot... Potential Future Pariah... Big Nerd... Spiraling, Anti-Trans Bigot.. A Lunatic AND a Bigot.. Very Ignorant of the World in General... Sounds deranged... Fake Christian... Weird... has the mind of a child... has paranoid delusions... Simpleton

User avatar
silverscreenselect
Posts: 23174
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:21 pm
Contact:

Re: Peter Strzok FINALLY fired

#6 Post by silverscreenselect » Mon Aug 13, 2018 12:43 pm

flockofseagulls104 wrote: Just the fact that he shared these prejudices with his mistress would be grounds for firing in the private sector.
If everyone who posted an ugly or off-color e-mail or text message in the private sector to a fellow employee was fired, most businesses would be severely understaffed.

Do you really think that there weren't any anti-Hillary e-mails or texts sent around the FBI at any time during the investigation of her?
Check out our website: http://www.silverscreenvideos.com

User avatar
Bob78164
Bored Moderator
Posts: 21626
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:02 pm
Location: By the phone

Re: Peter Strzok FINALLY fired

#7 Post by Bob78164 » Mon Aug 13, 2018 6:44 pm

This episode is part of the reason that Bob Goodlatte’s son will vote for his father’s Democratic opponent in his father’s reelection race this year. Goodlatte is Chair of the House Judiciary Committee. —Bob
"Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason than that of blindfolded fear." Thomas Jefferson

User avatar
Bob78164
Bored Moderator
Posts: 21626
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:02 pm
Location: By the phone

Re: Peter Strzok FINALLY fired

#8 Post by Bob78164 » Mon Aug 13, 2018 6:55 pm

flockofseagulls104 wrote:
Bob78164 wrote:As I mentioned earlier, I don’t care whether investigators have political views. That’s inevitable. I do care when investigators allow their political views to affect their decision making.

And it looks like that’s the case with the decision to fire Strzok. My understanding is that the FBI’s professional responsibility unit recommended a suspension but that the Deputy Director, a political appointee, overruled the recommendation. It sounds to me like a reprisal for anti-Donny views.

So there are three questions that need answering. First, what were the grounds for firing Strzok? Second, how has the FBI historically treated similar issues? Third, what process was used to make the decision?

Under the circumstances, a Congessional investigation is obviously appropriate. But the current head of the House Oversight Committee sees it as his job to protect the President, and that obviously makes him incapable of doing his job. The only way to fix that problem is to install a different Chair, one who understands the difference between oversight and cheerleading, and that will require a Democratic majority in the House. I’ll take one in the Senate as well. —Bob
Wow, the lengths you will go to justify your hypocrisy is astounding. Strzok didn't allow his STRONG bias to affect his decisions, even though there are emails that strongly suggest he did. Just the fact that he shared these prejudices with his mistress would be grounds for firing in the private sector. But the decision to fire him for that was a dastardly deed. And, so, we need yet another investigation.
You’re being incoherent here. Almost all private-sector employment is at-will, which means you don’t need a reason to fire someone and you’re perfectly free to fire an employee just because you don’t like his politics. But we really don’t want any cop being fired just because Comrade Donny and his handlers don’t like his politics or the possibility that Comrade Donny has handlers. And yet all three of the top people investigating that possibility have now been fired via the direct intervention of political appointees who owe Donny their jobs.

If something like this were happening in a Democratic administration you’d be screaming for a Congressional investigation. I want a Congress that understands the difference between oversight and using your position to protect the Administration, right or wrong. The only way we’re going to get one is with a Democratic majority. And then we’ll start finding out just what Donny has been hiding with the help of his Congessional enablers and the useful idiots who support them for no better reason than their party label. —Bob
"Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason than that of blindfolded fear." Thomas Jefferson

User avatar
flockofseagulls104
Posts: 7742
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 8:07 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: Peter Strzok FINALLY fired

#9 Post by flockofseagulls104 » Mon Aug 13, 2018 10:16 pm

I want a Congress that understands the difference between oversight and using your position to protect the Administration, right or wrong. The only way we’re going to get one is with a Democratic majority.
That is the most laughable statement that has ever been posted on this bored. Possibly anywhere. Congratulations, bob-tel!!!
Your friendly neighborhood racist. On the waiting list to be a nazi. Designated an honorary 'snowflake'. Trolled by the very best, as well as by BJ. Always typical, unlike others.., Fulminator, Hopelessly in the tank for trump... inappropriate... Flocking himself... Probably a tucking sexist, too... All thought comes from the right wing noise machine(TM)... A clear and present threat to The Future Of Our Democracy.. Doesn't understand anything... Made the trump apologist and enabler playoffs... Heathen bastard... Knows nothing about history... Liar.... don't know much about statistics and polling... Nothing at all about biology... Ignorant Bigot... Potential Future Pariah... Big Nerd... Spiraling, Anti-Trans Bigot.. A Lunatic AND a Bigot.. Very Ignorant of the World in General... Sounds deranged... Fake Christian... Weird... has the mind of a child... has paranoid delusions... Simpleton

User avatar
BackInTex
Posts: 12780
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:43 pm
Location: In Texas of course!

Re: Peter Strzok FINALLY fired

#10 Post by BackInTex » Tue Aug 14, 2018 6:28 am

silverscreenselect wrote:
Do you really think that there weren't any anti-Hillary e-mails or texts sent around the FBI at any time during the investigation of her?
Not by those assigned to investigate her.
..what country can preserve it’s liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? let them take arms.
~~ Thomas Jefferson

User avatar
silverscreenselect
Posts: 23174
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:21 pm
Contact:

Re: Peter Strzok FINALLY fired

#11 Post by silverscreenselect » Tue Aug 14, 2018 7:33 am

BackInTex wrote:
silverscreenselect wrote:
Do you really think that there weren't any anti-Hillary e-mails or texts sent around the FBI at any time during the investigation of her?
Not by those assigned to investigate her.
And how do you know?
Check out our website: http://www.silverscreenvideos.com

User avatar
BackInTex
Posts: 12780
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:43 pm
Location: In Texas of course!

Re: Peter Strzok FINALLY fired

#12 Post by BackInTex » Tue Aug 14, 2018 7:48 am

silverscreenselect wrote:
BackInTex wrote:
silverscreenselect wrote:
Do you really think that there weren't any anti-Hillary e-mails or texts sent around the FBI at any time during the investigation of her?
Not by those assigned to investigate her.
And how do you know?
I’m an expert on the subject. I’m never wrong.
..what country can preserve it’s liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? let them take arms.
~~ Thomas Jefferson

User avatar
flockofseagulls104
Posts: 7742
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 8:07 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: Peter Strzok FINALLY fired

#13 Post by flockofseagulls104 » Tue Aug 14, 2018 8:25 am

silverscreenselect wrote:
BackInTex wrote:
silverscreenselect wrote:
Do you really think that there weren't any anti-Hillary e-mails or texts sent around the FBI at any time during the investigation of her?
Not by those assigned to investigate her.
And how do you know?
Do you really think that if there were anti-Hillary emails or texts when she was "being investigated" that CNN would not be talking about it 24-7? That's how I know.
Your friendly neighborhood racist. On the waiting list to be a nazi. Designated an honorary 'snowflake'. Trolled by the very best, as well as by BJ. Always typical, unlike others.., Fulminator, Hopelessly in the tank for trump... inappropriate... Flocking himself... Probably a tucking sexist, too... All thought comes from the right wing noise machine(TM)... A clear and present threat to The Future Of Our Democracy.. Doesn't understand anything... Made the trump apologist and enabler playoffs... Heathen bastard... Knows nothing about history... Liar.... don't know much about statistics and polling... Nothing at all about biology... Ignorant Bigot... Potential Future Pariah... Big Nerd... Spiraling, Anti-Trans Bigot.. A Lunatic AND a Bigot.. Very Ignorant of the World in General... Sounds deranged... Fake Christian... Weird... has the mind of a child... has paranoid delusions... Simpleton

User avatar
Bob78164
Bored Moderator
Posts: 21626
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:02 pm
Location: By the phone

Re: Peter Strzok FINALLY fired

#14 Post by Bob78164 » Tue Aug 14, 2018 9:20 am

flockofseagulls104 wrote:
silverscreenselect wrote:
BackInTex wrote:
Not by those assigned to investigate her.
And how do you know?
Do you really think that if there were anti-Hillary emails or texts when she was "being investigated" that CNN would not be talking about it 24-7? That's how I know.
Just like Guccifer 2.0 released embarrassing e-mails from Donny’s campaign at the same time he released embarrassing e-mails from the Democrats?

Congress wasn’t trying to find information making the investigation of Secretary Clinton unpopular. In contrast, we’ve heard from his own mouth that the Chair of the House Oversight Committee sees it as his job to protect (rather than oversee) Donny. Comey overshared after the investigation concluded because he was afraid that if he didn’t, anti-Clinton agents within the investigation would leak. That, to me, is an example of biases actually affecting actions. You can’t name a single example of Strzok’s politics affecting his investigative decisions, and you can’t name a single example of ANYONE from Mueller’s investigation leaking anything at all.. —Bob
"Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason than that of blindfolded fear." Thomas Jefferson

User avatar
silverscreenselect
Posts: 23174
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:21 pm
Contact:

Re: Peter Strzok FINALLY fired

#15 Post by silverscreenselect » Tue Aug 14, 2018 10:05 am

Bob78164 wrote: You can’t name a single example of Strzok’s politics affecting his investigative decisions, and you can’t name a single example of ANYONE from Mueller’s investigation leaking anything at all.. —Bob
Whereas Rudy Giuliani has admitted that "loyal" FBI agents leaked information to him about the progress of the Clinton investigation.
Check out our website: http://www.silverscreenvideos.com

User avatar
tlynn78
Posts: 8652
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 9:31 am
Location: Montana

Re: Peter Strzok FINALLY fired

#16 Post by tlynn78 » Tue Aug 14, 2018 2:06 pm

GOOD NEWS!! You boys can contribute to his GoFundMe!!!
:lol: :lol: :lol:
To argue with a person who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead. -Thomas Paine
You can ignore reality, but you can't ignore the consequences of ignoring reality. -Ayn Rand
Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities. -Voltaire

Post Reply