Kavanaugh

The forum for general posting. Come join the madness. :)
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
Estonut
Evil Genius
Posts: 10495
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 1:16 am
Location: Garden Grove, CA

Re: Kavanaugh

#476 Post by Estonut » Wed Oct 03, 2018 8:44 pm

Bob Juch wrote:
Estonut wrote:
Bob Juch wrote:31 Lies and Counting

https://medium.com/@demandjustice/kavan ... ab6dee833d
The author of the linked article wrote:Kavanaugh: 31 Lies and Counting

Jeff Flake told 60 Minutes that Kavanaugh would not be confirmed if the FBI probe showed that he lied to the Senate Judiciary Committee.

LIE 1
In 2004, Kavanaugh claimed

LIE 2
In 2006, Kavanaugh denied

LIE 3
In 2006, Kavanaugh denied

LIE 4
In 2004, Kavanaugh denied

LIE 5
In a 2004 written questionnaire, Kavanaugh wrote

LIE 6
In 2006, Kavanaugh again denied knowing

LIE 7
In 2018, Kavanaugh denied knowing

LIE 8
During his confirmation hearing in 2006, Kavanaugh said

LIE 9
During Kavanaugh’s 2006 confirmation hearing

LIE 10
Kavanaugh claimed that his previous testimony

LIE 11
During his 2006 confirmation hearing for his D.C. Circuit Court nomination

LIE 12
Regarding the current allegation of sexual assault
FINALLY! The alleged lies to the Senate Judiciary Committee. The first 11 "lies" listed by the writer don't even fall under his/her premise.
Oh sorry, I guess it's only 20 lies.
Unless this idiot is making shit up, like you.
A child of five would understand this. Send someone to fetch a child of five.
Groucho Marx

User avatar
silverscreenselect
Posts: 23174
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:21 pm
Contact:

Re: Kavanaugh

#477 Post by silverscreenselect » Wed Oct 03, 2018 9:29 pm

Estonut wrote: If 4 people getting together to have a few drinks constitutes a party, then I've been to thousands.
I'm sure all those drinks have helped your memory.

But then again, the question isn't what your memory is or mine. It's Dr. Ford and Kavanaugh's memory. And contrary to your and Flock's assertions, expert testimony is admissible in cases like this to help fact finders assess the plausibility of various witness's testimony. Here's what one expert witness says:

https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/ob ... t-victims/
Check out our website: http://www.silverscreenvideos.com

User avatar
Bob78164
Bored Moderator
Posts: 21626
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:02 pm
Location: By the phone

Re: Kavanaugh

#478 Post by Bob78164 » Thu Oct 04, 2018 12:14 am

Beebs52 wrote:
Bob78164 wrote:
Beebs52 wrote:Hey lawyersorts, could you represent someone with whom you disagree politically?
Yes, but probably not in connection with a matter with political implications. --Bob
?
If a potential client who wants me to represent him or her in a business dispute happens to be a Republican, no problem. I just need to have confidence that the client will be honest with me and in court. In, say, a voting rights case, I'd probably have an issue representing someone who wanted to cut back voting rights, and that person's probably a Republican. --Bob
"Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason than that of blindfolded fear." Thomas Jefferson

User avatar
Estonut
Evil Genius
Posts: 10495
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 1:16 am
Location: Garden Grove, CA

Re: Kavanaugh

#479 Post by Estonut » Thu Oct 04, 2018 5:20 am

silverscreenselect wrote:
Estonut wrote: If 4 people getting together to have a few drinks constitutes a party, then I've been to thousands.
I'm sure all those drinks have helped your memory.
You seem to not remember that I already said, "I remember plenty of high school parties 40+ years later. Especially those where there were incidents or which later were rumored about."
silverscreenselect wrote:But then again, the question isn't what your memory is or mine. It's Dr. Ford and Kavanaugh's memory. And contrary to your and Flock's assertions, expert testimony is admissible in cases like this to help fact finders assess the plausibility of various witness's testimony. Here's what one expert witness says:

https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/ob ... t-victims/
Again, you seem to forget that I've already said, whatever these expert witnesses might testify CAN happen, it means nothing unless they've examined these 2 people. I'd hope that no psychological expert would testify about the mental state of either of these people without examining them first, especially since both are alive and available.

I'd also like the FBI or the Senate Judiciary Committee to examine her therapist's notes in their entirety. She should not be able to offer parts of them to support her story and then refuse to hand them over. I wonder what she's hiding.
A child of five would understand this. Send someone to fetch a child of five.
Groucho Marx

User avatar
silverscreenselect
Posts: 23174
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:21 pm
Contact:

Re: Kavanaugh

#480 Post by silverscreenselect » Thu Oct 04, 2018 6:56 am

Estonut wrote:I'd also like the FBI or the Senate Judiciary Committee to examine her therapist's notes in their entirety. She should not be able to offer parts of them to support her story and then refuse to hand them over. I wonder what she's hiding.
Her lawyers offered to turn them over to the FBI (not the Republicans on the Judiciary Committee). They apparently didn't examine her, the notes, or the witnesses she suggested contacting.
Check out our website: http://www.silverscreenvideos.com

User avatar
Beebs52
Queen of Wack
Posts: 14888
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:38 am
Location: Location.Location.Location

Re: Kavanaugh

#481 Post by Beebs52 » Thu Oct 04, 2018 5:59 pm

Well, then

User avatar
Bob Juch
Posts: 26427
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:58 am
Location: Oro Valley, Arizona
Contact:

Re: Kavanaugh

#482 Post by Bob Juch » Thu Oct 04, 2018 6:07 pm

I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I needed to be.
- Douglas Adams (1952 - 2001)

Si fractum non sit, noli id reficere.

Teach a child to be polite and courteous in the home and, when he grows up, he'll never be able to drive in New Jersey.

User avatar
Beebs52
Queen of Wack
Posts: 14888
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:38 am
Location: Location.Location.Location

Re: Kavanaugh

#483 Post by Beebs52 » Thu Oct 04, 2018 6:08 pm

Well, then

User avatar
Bob Juch
Posts: 26427
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:58 am
Location: Oro Valley, Arizona
Contact:

Re: Kavanaugh

#484 Post by Bob Juch » Thu Oct 04, 2018 6:10 pm

I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I needed to be.
- Douglas Adams (1952 - 2001)

Si fractum non sit, noli id reficere.

Teach a child to be polite and courteous in the home and, when he grows up, he'll never be able to drive in New Jersey.

User avatar
Beebs52
Queen of Wack
Posts: 14888
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:38 am
Location: Location.Location.Location

Re: Kavanaugh

#485 Post by Beebs52 » Thu Oct 04, 2018 6:28 pm

Bob Juch wrote:
Beebs52 wrote:
Bob Juch wrote: Justice Stevens dissents. https://www.mypalmbeachpost.com/news/re ... CimtNxpjJ/
Whatevs.
https://www.theladders.com/career-advic ... mmon-thing
Now tbat is priceless. I needed a giggle. Thx.
Well, then

User avatar
Bob Juch
Posts: 26427
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:58 am
Location: Oro Valley, Arizona
Contact:

Re: Kavanaugh

#486 Post by Bob Juch » Thu Oct 04, 2018 8:02 pm

100,000 U.S. Christian Churches Demand Withdrawal of Kavanaugh's Supreme Court Nomination

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/100-000- ... 19723.html
I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I needed to be.
- Douglas Adams (1952 - 2001)

Si fractum non sit, noli id reficere.

Teach a child to be polite and courteous in the home and, when he grows up, he'll never be able to drive in New Jersey.

User avatar
Bob Juch
Posts: 26427
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:58 am
Location: Oro Valley, Arizona
Contact:

Re: Kavanaugh

#487 Post by Bob Juch » Thu Oct 04, 2018 8:13 pm

Undecided Dem Sen Manchin tells reporters he has been ‘thrown out’ of the room where he’d been reading the only copy of the FBI report because it was the ‘Republicans’ turn’ to read it,” tweeted McClatchy reporter Emma Dumain. “He says he has to come back tomorrow to finish, then will make a decision on Kavanaugh.
I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I needed to be.
- Douglas Adams (1952 - 2001)

Si fractum non sit, noli id reficere.

Teach a child to be polite and courteous in the home and, when he grows up, he'll never be able to drive in New Jersey.

User avatar
Bob78164
Bored Moderator
Posts: 21626
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:02 pm
Location: By the phone

Re: Kavanaugh

#488 Post by Bob78164 » Thu Oct 04, 2018 8:38 pm

The Denver Post is reporting that Cory Gardner is saying he hasn't made up his mind to vote for Kavanaugh. --Bob
"Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason than that of blindfolded fear." Thomas Jefferson

User avatar
SportsFan68
No Scritches!!!
Posts: 21098
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 8:36 pm
Location: God's Country

Re: Kavanaugh

#489 Post by SportsFan68 » Thu Oct 04, 2018 9:49 pm

Bob78164 wrote:The Denver Post is reporting that Cory Gardner is saying he hasn't made up his mind to vote for Kavanaugh. --Bob
A bunch of us have been working very hard on this, including telephoning and demonstrating outside his local office last night and tonight. We'll probably demonstrate Friday night also.

However, it will astonish me if he votes no. He has been a most excellent little minion for Trump.
-- In Iroquois society, leaders are encouraged to remember seven generations in the past and consider seven generations in the future when making decisions that affect the people.
-- America would be a better place if leaders would do more long-term thinking. -- Wilma Mankiller

User avatar
flockofseagulls104
Posts: 7742
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 8:07 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: Kavanaugh

#490 Post by flockofseagulls104 » Thu Oct 04, 2018 10:19 pm

SportsFan68 wrote:
Bob78164 wrote:The Denver Post is reporting that Cory Gardner is saying he hasn't made up his mind to vote for Kavanaugh. --Bob
A bunch of us have been working very hard on this, including telephoning and demonstrating outside his local office last night and tonight. We'll probably demonstrate Friday night also.

However, it will astonish me if he votes no. He has been a most excellent little minion for Trump.
I don't think you would do it. But are any of your bunch going to do your civic duty and get in his face and yell at him and his family when he's at a restaurant? Maybe follow him home and throw tomatoes at his house?
Your friendly neighborhood racist. On the waiting list to be a nazi. Designated an honorary 'snowflake'. Trolled by the very best, as well as by BJ. Always typical, unlike others.., Fulminator, Hopelessly in the tank for trump... inappropriate... Flocking himself... Probably a tucking sexist, too... All thought comes from the right wing noise machine(TM)... A clear and present threat to The Future Of Our Democracy.. Doesn't understand anything... Made the trump apologist and enabler playoffs... Heathen bastard... Knows nothing about history... Liar.... don't know much about statistics and polling... Nothing at all about biology... Ignorant Bigot... Potential Future Pariah... Big Nerd... Spiraling, Anti-Trans Bigot.. A Lunatic AND a Bigot.. Very Ignorant of the World in General... Sounds deranged... Fake Christian... Weird... has the mind of a child... has paranoid delusions... Simpleton

User avatar
Estonut
Evil Genius
Posts: 10495
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 1:16 am
Location: Garden Grove, CA

Re: Kavanaugh

#491 Post by Estonut » Thu Oct 04, 2018 11:45 pm

Bob Juch wrote:100,000 U.S. Christian Churches Demand Withdrawal of Kavanaugh's Supreme Court Nomination

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/100-000- ... 19723.html
Impressive. Did they get signatures from all 45 million churchgoers?

Remember when your side said it would have been impossible for Kavanaugh's representatives to collect, what, 65 signatures in a day? Two people collecting less than 3 supporters per hour? No way! :roll:
A child of five would understand this. Send someone to fetch a child of five.
Groucho Marx

User avatar
silverscreenselect
Posts: 23174
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:21 pm
Contact:

Re: Kavanaugh

#492 Post by silverscreenselect » Fri Oct 05, 2018 5:06 am

Estonut wrote:Impressive. Did they get signatures from all 45 million churchgoers?
No, the article said that the National Council of Churches, which represents 100,000 churches came out against Kavanaugh. And it's quite possible that the governing board of the Council would come out with such a proclamation. The more people go beyond sticking their heads in the sand like you and Flock and examining what has really transpired in the last two weeks, the more they realize there are big problems with Judge Kavanaugh's overall temperament.

I have yet to hear of one person who said "I was opposed to Judge Kavanaugh when this whole affair started, but I'm for him now."
Check out our website: http://www.silverscreenvideos.com

User avatar
Estonut
Evil Genius
Posts: 10495
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 1:16 am
Location: Garden Grove, CA

Re: Kavanaugh

#493 Post by Estonut » Fri Oct 05, 2018 6:23 am

silverscreenselect wrote:
Estonut wrote:Impressive. Did they get signatures from all 45 million churchgoers?
No, the article said that the National Council of Churches, which represents 100,000 churches came out against Kavanaugh. And it's quite possible that the governing board of the Council would come out with such a proclamation.
That's my point, I just used the bigger number. NCC represents 100,000 churches in a partnership of 38 Christian faith groups. To make the council effective, I'd guess they have 38 members running the show. Regardless, there was some portion of their leadership that (may have) chosen to make this statement, if they even did (I don't know anything about "Religious News Service," except that I've never heard of them before). Whatever the number, it is probably less than .1% of the people in those churches. BJ's (misleading, as usual) headline was, "100,000 U.S. Christian Churches Demand Withdrawal of Kavanaugh's Supreme Court Nomination." That just is not true.
silverscreenselect wrote:The more people go beyond sticking their heads in the sand like you and Flock and examining what has really transpired in the last two weeks, the more they realize there are big problems with Judge Kavanaugh's overall temperament.
I'm not burying my head in the sand about anything. I am just more open-minded about what I believe.
silverscreenselect wrote:I have yet to hear of one person who said "I was opposed to Judge Kavanaugh when this whole affair started, but I'm for him now."
No one wants to get screamed at/attacked/protested by your side. You will hear them loud and clear at the elections. Prepare to be shocked again.
A child of five would understand this. Send someone to fetch a child of five.
Groucho Marx

User avatar
flockofseagulls104
Posts: 7742
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 8:07 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: Kavanaugh

#494 Post by flockofseagulls104 » Fri Oct 05, 2018 8:14 am

silverscreenselect wrote:
Estonut wrote:Impressive. Did they get signatures from all 45 million churchgoers?
No, the article said that the National Council of Churches, which represents 100,000 churches came out against Kavanaugh. And it's quite possible that the governing board of the Council would come out with such a proclamation. The more people go beyond sticking their heads in the sand like you and Flock and examining what has really transpired in the last two weeks, the more they realize there are big problems with Judge Kavanaugh's overall temperament.

I have yet to hear of one person who said "I was opposed to Judge Kavanaugh when this whole affair started, but I'm for him now."
I have big problems with Kagan's, Sotomayor's and especially Vadar-Ginsberg's 'judicial' temperament when it concerns the Constitution.
Your friendly neighborhood racist. On the waiting list to be a nazi. Designated an honorary 'snowflake'. Trolled by the very best, as well as by BJ. Always typical, unlike others.., Fulminator, Hopelessly in the tank for trump... inappropriate... Flocking himself... Probably a tucking sexist, too... All thought comes from the right wing noise machine(TM)... A clear and present threat to The Future Of Our Democracy.. Doesn't understand anything... Made the trump apologist and enabler playoffs... Heathen bastard... Knows nothing about history... Liar.... don't know much about statistics and polling... Nothing at all about biology... Ignorant Bigot... Potential Future Pariah... Big Nerd... Spiraling, Anti-Trans Bigot.. A Lunatic AND a Bigot.. Very Ignorant of the World in General... Sounds deranged... Fake Christian... Weird... has the mind of a child... has paranoid delusions... Simpleton

User avatar
silverscreenselect
Posts: 23174
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:21 pm
Contact:

Re: Kavanaugh

#495 Post by silverscreenselect » Fri Oct 05, 2018 8:28 am

flockofseagulls104 wrote:
silverscreenselect wrote:
Estonut wrote:Impressive. Did they get signatures from all 45 million churchgoers?
No, the article said that the National Council of Churches, which represents 100,000 churches came out against Kavanaugh. And it's quite possible that the governing board of the Council would come out with such a proclamation. The more people go beyond sticking their heads in the sand like you and Flock and examining what has really transpired in the last two weeks, the more they realize there are big problems with Judge Kavanaugh's overall temperament.

I have yet to hear of one person who said "I was opposed to Judge Kavanaugh when this whole affair started, but I'm for him now."
I have big problems with Kagan's, Sotomayor's and especially Vadar-Ginsberg's 'judicial' temperament when it concerns the Constitution.
Making decisions you disagree with has nothing to do with judicial temperament. I haven't heard anyone complain about how Gorsuch has acted.

And you avoided my statement. No one has come out and said they opposed Kavanaugh before the latest hearing and investigation and support him now, but plenty of distinguished legal minds have made the opposite statement (including some who publicly endorsed him earlier).
Check out our website: http://www.silverscreenvideos.com

User avatar
flockofseagulls104
Posts: 7742
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 8:07 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: Kavanaugh

#496 Post by flockofseagulls104 » Fri Oct 05, 2018 8:59 am

silverscreenselect wrote:
flockofseagulls104 wrote:
silverscreenselect wrote:
No, the article said that the National Council of Churches, which represents 100,000 churches came out against Kavanaugh. And it's quite possible that the governing board of the Council would come out with such a proclamation. The more people go beyond sticking their heads in the sand like you and Flock and examining what has really transpired in the last two weeks, the more they realize there are big problems with Judge Kavanaugh's overall temperament.

I have yet to hear of one person who said "I was opposed to Judge Kavanaugh when this whole affair started, but I'm for him now."
I have big problems with Kagan's, Sotomayor's and especially Vadar-Ginsberg's 'judicial' temperament when it concerns the Constitution.
Making decisions you disagree with has nothing to do with judicial temperament. I haven't heard anyone complain about how Gorsuch has acted.

And you avoided my statement. No one has come out and said they opposed Kavanaugh before the latest hearing and investigation and support him now, but plenty of distinguished legal minds have made the opposite statement (including some who publicly endorsed him earlier).
I believe Esto answered that question sufficiently. I try and read what people write and advance from that point. As usual, you ignore answers that you don't like. It's like the difference between TV series that have continuity between episodes and those that are just a formula. You (and bob-tel) are a formula of leftist narrative.

One thing I have seen that make a lot of sense, that you conveniently ignore, is that what Feinstein, and presumably the dem leadership, have done in their strategy to delay the vote is create 5 new victims, and they don't care. Kavanaugh's family has been put through as much hell as Dr. Ford, only because of what Feinstein did. If she had followed the established process, all could have been resolved, for better or worse, behind the scenes, sparing both Ford and Kavanaugh this disgusting trial through the media. But the priority for the dems trumped everything. And that is in itself disgusting.
Your friendly neighborhood racist. On the waiting list to be a nazi. Designated an honorary 'snowflake'. Trolled by the very best, as well as by BJ. Always typical, unlike others.., Fulminator, Hopelessly in the tank for trump... inappropriate... Flocking himself... Probably a tucking sexist, too... All thought comes from the right wing noise machine(TM)... A clear and present threat to The Future Of Our Democracy.. Doesn't understand anything... Made the trump apologist and enabler playoffs... Heathen bastard... Knows nothing about history... Liar.... don't know much about statistics and polling... Nothing at all about biology... Ignorant Bigot... Potential Future Pariah... Big Nerd... Spiraling, Anti-Trans Bigot.. A Lunatic AND a Bigot.. Very Ignorant of the World in General... Sounds deranged... Fake Christian... Weird... has the mind of a child... has paranoid delusions... Simpleton

User avatar
flockofseagulls104
Posts: 7742
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 8:07 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: Kavanaugh

#497 Post by flockofseagulls104 » Fri Oct 05, 2018 9:15 am

I think the most concerning thing about this fiasco is the sizable group of people who believe 'This is a job interview. The presumption of innocence does not apply.' This is a totally ignorant and dangerous notion. The presumption of innocence is the very foundation of our legal system. If you do away with it in any situation it threatens the freedom of us all.

In the future, if you oppose someone's nomination, all you have to do is put together a 'committee' to scour for someone who could make a semi-credible charge against that person's integrity that can't be immediately disproven. Leak it to the media and you have accomplished your goal. Even the disgusting Avenatti charge would do.

I look forward to being amused by the ethical lawyer's response to this observation. He's probably sitting by his batphone.
Your friendly neighborhood racist. On the waiting list to be a nazi. Designated an honorary 'snowflake'. Trolled by the very best, as well as by BJ. Always typical, unlike others.., Fulminator, Hopelessly in the tank for trump... inappropriate... Flocking himself... Probably a tucking sexist, too... All thought comes from the right wing noise machine(TM)... A clear and present threat to The Future Of Our Democracy.. Doesn't understand anything... Made the trump apologist and enabler playoffs... Heathen bastard... Knows nothing about history... Liar.... don't know much about statistics and polling... Nothing at all about biology... Ignorant Bigot... Potential Future Pariah... Big Nerd... Spiraling, Anti-Trans Bigot.. A Lunatic AND a Bigot.. Very Ignorant of the World in General... Sounds deranged... Fake Christian... Weird... has the mind of a child... has paranoid delusions... Simpleton

User avatar
silverscreenselect
Posts: 23174
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:21 pm
Contact:

Re: Kavanaugh

#498 Post by silverscreenselect » Fri Oct 05, 2018 10:25 am

flockofseagulls104 wrote: This is a totally ignorant and dangerous notion. The presumption of innocence is the very foundation of our legal system.
This is not about the presumption of innocence. This is about demonstrating fitness for the highest judicial position in our country. The canons of judicial ethics don't merely say that judges should avoid impropriety; they require judges to avoid the appearance of impropriety... in other words something that might be construed as showing partiality or unfitness. That's a burden no one else in our society faces.

And even by your own standards, as long as you choose to disbelieve anything a complaining witness says unless there is documentary proof of it, then a lot of people who were rightly committed of sex crimes will get off the hook. Testimony given in court is evidence, the same as DNA samples.

And you're right; that does disqualify a lot of people from being judges, especially Supreme Court justices, as it should.

Kavanaugh has failed that test as demonstrated by the overwhelming number of people in the legal community, who know a lot more than Flock and his buddies at Breitbart about what's the foundation of the system, who have come out against the nomination, even in many cases when they supported it in the first place. I don't know what will happen in the future. I do know that based on the treatment Dr. Ford has received, a lot of women are going to be a lot more reluctant about revealing past assaults.
Check out our website: http://www.silverscreenvideos.com

User avatar
flockofseagulls104
Posts: 7742
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 8:07 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: Kavanaugh

#499 Post by flockofseagulls104 » Fri Oct 05, 2018 10:30 am


flockofseagulls104 wrote:
I have big problems with Kagan's, Sotomayor's and especially Vadar-Ginsberg's 'judicial' temperament when it concerns the Constitution.

silverscreenselect wrote:
Making decisions you disagree with has nothing to do with judicial temperament.
https://www.cnn.com/2018/08/31/politics ... index.html

It's ok to be political if you're a democrat justice. right?
Your friendly neighborhood racist. On the waiting list to be a nazi. Designated an honorary 'snowflake'. Trolled by the very best, as well as by BJ. Always typical, unlike others.., Fulminator, Hopelessly in the tank for trump... inappropriate... Flocking himself... Probably a tucking sexist, too... All thought comes from the right wing noise machine(TM)... A clear and present threat to The Future Of Our Democracy.. Doesn't understand anything... Made the trump apologist and enabler playoffs... Heathen bastard... Knows nothing about history... Liar.... don't know much about statistics and polling... Nothing at all about biology... Ignorant Bigot... Potential Future Pariah... Big Nerd... Spiraling, Anti-Trans Bigot.. A Lunatic AND a Bigot.. Very Ignorant of the World in General... Sounds deranged... Fake Christian... Weird... has the mind of a child... has paranoid delusions... Simpleton

User avatar
flockofseagulls104
Posts: 7742
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 8:07 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: Kavanaugh

#500 Post by flockofseagulls104 » Fri Oct 05, 2018 10:32 am

who know a lot more than Flock and his buddies at Breitbart
I got you, babe!

Your friendly neighborhood racist. On the waiting list to be a nazi. Designated an honorary 'snowflake'. Trolled by the very best, as well as by BJ. Always typical, unlike others.., Fulminator, Hopelessly in the tank for trump... inappropriate... Flocking himself... Probably a tucking sexist, too... All thought comes from the right wing noise machine(TM)... A clear and present threat to The Future Of Our Democracy.. Doesn't understand anything... Made the trump apologist and enabler playoffs... Heathen bastard... Knows nothing about history... Liar.... don't know much about statistics and polling... Nothing at all about biology... Ignorant Bigot... Potential Future Pariah... Big Nerd... Spiraling, Anti-Trans Bigot.. A Lunatic AND a Bigot.. Very Ignorant of the World in General... Sounds deranged... Fake Christian... Weird... has the mind of a child... has paranoid delusions... Simpleton

Post Reply