Seems very quiet here about the bombs

[a1mamacat]

the difference between protesting to chase someone out of a restaurant, and sending them a bomb seems to directly correlate to the overt approval of your president supporting violence of his supporters.

[Beebs52]

the difference between protesting to chase someone out of a restaurant, and sending them a bomb seems to directly correlate to the overt approval of your president supporting violence of his supporters.

Nice. Do you know who's responsible? Who in any right mind would do this? Don't make shit up. We'll hafta call you Sssauce

[BackInTex]

the difference between protesting to chase someone out of a restaurant, and sending them a bomb seems to directly correlate to the overt approval of your president supporting violence of his supporters.

What about shooting politicians playing softball? Or shooting cops in the back of the head while filling up their patrol car? Or shooting cops while they are protecting those protesting against them?

And who here has approved of Trump supporting violence?

[Bob Juch]

the difference between protesting to chase someone out of a restaurant, and sending them a bomb seems to directly correlate to the overt approval of your president supporting violence of his supporters.

What about shooting politicians playing softball? Or shooting cops in the back of the head while filling up their patrol car? Or shooting cops while they are protecting those protesting against them?

And who here has approved of Trump supporting violence?

So, Mr. Whatabout, that justifies today's actions?

[Beebs52]

the difference between protesting to chase someone out of a restaurant, and sending them a bomb seems to directly correlate to the overt approval of your president supporting violence of his supporters.

What about shooting politicians playing softball? Or shooting cops in the back of the head while filling up their patrol car? Or shooting cops while they are protecting those protesting against them?

And who here has approved of Trump supporting violence?

So, Mr. Whatabout, that justifies today's actions?

Are you deliberately obtuse or is it a gene from one of your ancestors?

[BackInTex]

What about shooting politicians playing softball? Or shooting cops in the back of the head while filling up their patrol car? Or shooting cops while they are protecting those protesting against them?

And who here has approved of Trump supporting violence?

So, Mr. Whatabout, that justifies today's actions?

Are you deliberately obtuse or is it a gene from one of your ancestors?

Perhaps one of Jefferson's goats.

[BackInTex]

So, Mr. Whatabout, that justifies today's actions?

Not in the least. Never implied it did. My "whatabouts" were targeted to Saucie's relating these attacks to those of us who support many things about Trump (but not what she implies we approve of) and that we must "approve" of these by association.

She's being a turd (to be polite).

[silverscreenselect]

And who here has approved of Trump supporting violence?

No one here has approved of Trump supporting violence, but at least one member of this Bored has opined repeatedly that the real danger we face is from left wing, Antifa activists being stirred up by George Soros, presumably to disturb Mitch McConnell's lunch.

I do think we'll know who's behind this pretty soon, since the bomber or bombers don't appear to be very sophisticated and the unexploded bombs and packages should have lots of evidence in them

[BackInTex]

And who here has approved of Trump supporting violence?

No one here has approved of Trump supporting violence, but at least one member of this Bored has opined repeatedly that the real danger we face is from left wing, Antifa activists being stirred up by George Soros, presumably to disturb Mitch McConnell's lunch.

I do think we'll know who's behind this pretty soon, since the bomber or bombers don't appear to be very sophisticated and the unexploded bombs and packages should have lots of evidence in them

I hope so.

[tlynn78]

the difference between protesting to chase someone out of a restaurant, and sending them a bomb seems to directly correlate to the overt approval of your president supporting violence of his supporters.

Of course it does, dear.

[SportsFan68]

So, Mr. Whatabout, that justifies today's actions?

Not in the least. Never implied it did. My "whatabouts" were targeted to Saucie's relating these attacks to those of us who support many things about Trump (but not what she implies we approve of) and that we must "approve" of these by association.

She's being a turd (to be polite).

That is NOT polite. A turd is a lump of excrement. Stop saying turd and saying or thinking that it's a polite euphemism. It's not.

[a1mamacat]

So, Mr. Whatabout, that justifies today's actions?

Not in the least. Never implied it did. My "whatabouts" were targeted to Saucie's relating these attacks to those of us who support many things about Trump (but not what she implies we approve of) and that we must "approve" of these by association.

She's being a turd (to be polite).

Not in the least. Never implied that you supported these actions. My comment was that your president provides overt approval for violence against political opponents and the media. Usually actions such as these cause massive posting.

[Beebs52]

So, Mr. Whatabout, that justifies today's actions?

Not in the least. Never implied it did. My "whatabouts" were targeted to Saucie's relating these attacks to those of us who support many things about Trump (but not what she implies we approve of) and that we must "approve" of these by association.

She's being a turd (to be polite).

Not in the least. Never implied that you supported these actions. My comment was that your president provides overt approval for violence against political opponents and the media. Usually actions such as these cause massive posting.

Massive posting? wtf?

[tlynn78]

Not in the least. Never implied it did. My "whatabouts" were targeted to Saucie's relating these attacks to those of us who support many things about Trump (but not what she implies we approve of) and that we must "approve" of these by association.

She's being a turd (to be polite).

Not in the least. Never implied that you supported these actions. My comment was that your president provides overt approval for violence against political opponents and the media. Usually actions such as these cause massive posting.

Massive posting? wtf?

It is a little odd the usual Bored cryers haven't inundated us with all their insider knowledge and updates, enaht. Must be a glitch in the Batphone.

[BackInTex]

So, Mr. Whatabout, that justifies today's actions?

Not in the least. Never implied it did. My "whatabouts" were targeted to Saucie's relating these attacks to those of us who support many things about Trump (but not what she implies we approve of) and that we must "approve" of these by association.

She's being a turd (to be polite).

Not in the least. Never implied that you supported these actions. My comment was that your president provides overt approval for violence against political opponents and the media. Usually actions such as these cause massive posting.

Um, the title of this thread is Seems very quiet here about the bombs

"Here" along with your comment implies the unusual quietness was from the usual suspects here. Your comment was not about the President's overt approval, but the overt approval of the President and his [supposed] support of violence. If not for the "here" in the title, I could be persuaded to think it was not about some "here", but that word is there.

[Bob78164]

So, Mr. Whatabout, that justifies today's actions?

Not in the least. Never implied it did. My "whatabouts" were targeted to Saucie's relating these attacks to those of us who support many things about Trump (but not what she implies we approve of) and that we must "approve" of these by association.

She's being a turd (to be polite).

Not in the least. Never implied that you supported these actions. My comment was that your president provides overt approval for violence against political opponents and the media. Usually actions such as these cause massive posting.

Check the George Soros thread. --Bob

[BackInTex]

That is NOT polite. A turd is a lump of excrement. Stop saying turd and saying or thinking that it's a polite euphemism. It's not.

Turd can be a polite or even endearing euphemism. I hear it used both ways, often.

[Bob Juch]

That is NOT polite. A turd is a lump of excrement. Stop saying turd and saying or thinking that it's a polite euphemism. It's not.

Turd can be a polite or even endearing euphemism. I hear it used both ways, often.

Is that why you keep polishing them?

[Beebs52]

Ricin, Collins, Mattis,etc...

[Beebs52]

https://www.google.com/amp/s/mobile.reu ... SKCN1MQ30C
https://www.google.com/amp/s/mobile.reu ... SKCN1MF29O

[Bob Juch]

https://www.google.com/amp/s/mobile.reu ... SKCN1MQ30C
https://www.google.com/amp/s/mobile.reu ... SKCN1MF29O

I see the queen of whataboutism is alive and well.

[Beebs52]

https://www.google.com/amp/s/mobile.reu ... SKCN1MQ30C
https://www.google.com/amp/s/mobile.reu ... SKCN1MF29O

I see the queen of whataboutism is alive and well.

6ou are funny. Terrorist attacks only count against Dems. Of course.

[themanintheseersuckersuit]

When it was time, he went downstairs, took his place in the lobby before the entourage appeared. The hotel staff had been lined up to see their boss, the president, go by. A few of them applauded. Most did not.

The president didn’t seem to notice. He waved, in his desultory fashion. The Secret Service agents clustered around him, ushered him toward the armored limo idling outside at the curb.

The Russian waited until they were a few steps past before he drew the gun. He sighted on the center of the president’s back, and squeezed the trigger.

[Bob Juch]

When it was time, he went downstairs, took his place in the lobby before the entourage appeared. The hotel staff had been lined up to see their boss, the president, go by. A few of them applauded. Most did not.

The president didn’t seem to notice. He waved, in his desultory fashion. The Secret Service agents clustered around him, ushered him toward the armored limo idling outside at the curb.

The Russian waited until they were a few steps past before he drew the gun. He sighted on the center of the president’s back, and squeezed the trigger.

The gun misfires and the story ends with a Secret Service agent handing over his Glock and saying, "Here, use mine."

[Bob Juch]

https://www.google.com/amp/s/mobile.reu ... SKCN1MQ30C
https://www.google.com/amp/s/mobile.reu ... SKCN1MF29O

I see the queen of whataboutism is alive and well.

6ou are funny. Terrorist attacks only count against Dems. Of course.

Only when Trump doesn't encourage them.