Texas judge strikes entire Affordable Care Act

The forum for general posting. Come join the madness. :)
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
Bob78164
Bored Moderator
Posts: 21626
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:02 pm
Location: By the phone

Texas judge strikes entire Affordable Care Act

#1 Post by Bob78164 » Fri Dec 14, 2018 8:26 pm

Republicans have won at least a temporary victory in their efforts to deprive millions of Americans of health insurance. The Texas federal judge hearing the case struck down the entire Affordable Care Act based on Congress's decision a year ago to remove the tax penalty for failure to comply with the individual mandate. He concluded that even though Congress did not repeal the rest of the law, the Act was inseverable so that Congress implicitly did what it failed to do explicitly.

I do not know yet whether the judge stayed his ruling in anticipation of an appeal. There will be one. --Bob
"Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason than that of blindfolded fear." Thomas Jefferson

User avatar
Bob78164
Bored Moderator
Posts: 21626
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:02 pm
Location: By the phone

Re: Texas judge strikes entire Affordable Care Act

#2 Post by Bob78164 » Sun Dec 16, 2018 8:01 pm

I haven’t yet found a link to the opinion so I can read it for myself, but based on descriptions of its reasoning it’s every bit as stupid as I expected. Pure result-motivated judicial activism. Fortunately, I’m pretty sure that even the conservative Fifth Circuit will reverse the ruling so the damage should be limited. —Bob
"Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason than that of blindfolded fear." Thomas Jefferson

User avatar
jarnon
Posts: 6264
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 9:52 pm
Location: Merion, Pa.

Re: Texas judge strikes entire Affordable Care Act

#3 Post by jarnon » Sun Dec 16, 2018 10:56 pm

Bob78164 wrote:I haven’t yet found a link to the opinion so I can read it for myself.
Here you go:
State of Texas v. United States of America

My non-expert refutation:
Judge O'Connor states that the individual mandate and the penalty are separate provisions. That may have been true in the ACA as originally enacted. But the Chief Justice ruled that the individual mandate, based on the commerce clause, is unconstitutional (a decision that Bob hates), so only the penalty remained. Then Congress removed the penalty, so there's no individual mandate any more.

That misconception appears twice in the judge's opinion. In his mind, the plaintiffs have standing because the individual mandate is still part of the law. Also, he believes Congress had no intent to repeal the individual mandate, just the tax, even though that's not what Congress said.

He also thinks that the individual mandate penalty is inseverable from rest of law. But that's clearly not what Congress intended, since they repealed the penalty but not the whole law. And previous court cases have invalidated other parts of the ACA without overturning the whole law.
Last edited by jarnon on Sun Dec 16, 2018 11:32 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Слава Україні!
עם ישראל חי

User avatar
Bob78164
Bored Moderator
Posts: 21626
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:02 pm
Location: By the phone

Re: Texas judge strikes entire Affordable Care Act

#4 Post by Bob78164 » Sun Dec 16, 2018 11:16 pm

jarnon wrote:My non-expert refutation:
Judge O'Connor states that the individual mandate and the penalty are separate provisions. That may have been true in the ACA as originally enacted. But the Chief Justice ruled that the individual mandate, based on the commerce clause, is unconstitutional, so only the penalty remained. Then Congress removed the penalty, so there's no individual mandate any more.

That misconception appears twice in the judge's opinion. In his mind, the plaintiffs have standing because the individual mandate is still part of the law. Also, he believes Congress had no intent to repeal the individual mandate, just the tax, even though that's not what Congress said.

He also thinks that the individual mandate penalty is inseverable from rest of law. But that's clearly not what Congress intended, since they repealed the penalty but not the whole law. And previous court cases have invalidated other parts of the ACA without overturning the whole law.
That second part is his fundamental gross error of law. He focused on the intent of the 2010 Congress, which is irrelevant. What's relevant is whether Congress intended to repeal the rest of the Affordable Care Act in 2017 when it eliminated the penalty for the individual mandate. (I have no idea, by the way, how he concluded that the individual mandate is still part of the law at all since as far as I know there's no consequence whatsoever for violating it (other than being uninsured, of course).) And we know damn well that Congress didn't intend to repeal the rest of the Affordable Care Act when it zeroed out the penalty for violating the individual mandate because Congress didn't repeal the rest of the Affordable Care Act when it zeroed out the penalty for violating the individual mandate. --Bob
"Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason than that of blindfolded fear." Thomas Jefferson

User avatar
BackInTex
Posts: 12780
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:43 pm
Location: In Texas of course!

Re: Texas judge strikes entire Affordable Care Act

#5 Post by BackInTex » Mon Dec 17, 2018 9:00 am

The entire thing is silly. Roberts said the ACA was constitutional (specifically the individual mandate) because is was a "tax". It is not. A tax is not a penalty for non-performance. It is a penalty. There never was a tax.
..what country can preserve it’s liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? let them take arms.
~~ Thomas Jefferson

User avatar
Bob78164
Bored Moderator
Posts: 21626
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:02 pm
Location: By the phone

Re: Texas judge strikes entire Affordable Care Act

#6 Post by Bob78164 » Mon Dec 17, 2018 10:32 am

BackInTex wrote:The entire thing is silly. Roberts said the ACA was constitutional (specifically the individual mandate) because is was a "tax". It is not. A tax is not a penalty for non-performance. It is a penalty. There never was a tax.
As a matter of fact, you're wrong about that specific point. The Court has frequently justified "penalties" of exactly the sort you describe as exercises of Congressional taxing power. --Bob
"Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason than that of blindfolded fear." Thomas Jefferson

User avatar
BackInTex
Posts: 12780
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:43 pm
Location: In Texas of course!

Re: Texas judge strikes entire Affordable Care Act

#7 Post by BackInTex » Mon Dec 17, 2018 11:04 am

Bob78164 wrote:
BackInTex wrote:The entire thing is silly. Roberts said the ACA was constitutional (specifically the individual mandate) because is was a "tax". It is not. A tax is not a penalty for non-performance. It is a penalty. There never was a tax.
As a matter of fact, you're wrong about that specific point. The Court has frequently justified "penalties" of exactly the sort you describe as exercises of Congressional taxing power. --Bob
I'm not wrong. The Court is, if they call a penalty a tax. But you used the word "justified" and that is very different than "defines". Please think for yourself. Do YOU think a penalty is a tax?
..what country can preserve it’s liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? let them take arms.
~~ Thomas Jefferson

User avatar
jarnon
Posts: 6264
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 9:52 pm
Location: Merion, Pa.

Re: Texas judge strikes entire Affordable Care Act

#8 Post by jarnon » Mon Dec 17, 2018 11:38 am

BackInTex wrote:I'm not wrong. The Court is, if they call a penalty a tax. But you used the word "justified" and that is very different than "defines". Please think for yourself. Do YOU think a penalty is a tax?
Other penalties, like for IRA withdrawals, seem to me to be a tax. And paying for Social Security and Medicare, even though they’re retirement investments, are taxes too. The government uses various names like duty, tariff, fee, etc., but in my mind they’re all taxes. The only government payment that doesn’t seem like a tax is when you’re paying for a product or service like admission to a national park.
Слава Україні!
עם ישראל חי

User avatar
jarnon
Posts: 6264
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 9:52 pm
Location: Merion, Pa.

Re: Texas judge strikes entire Affordable Care Act

#9 Post by jarnon » Mon Dec 17, 2018 11:47 am

Locally, the fees for a parking permit, dog license and burglar alarm feel like taxes, but the fees for pool membership and trash pickup don’t. That’s just my opinion (see I can think for myself). But the only opinion that counts is John Roberts’s.
Слава Україні!
עם ישראל חי

User avatar
Bob Juch
Posts: 26427
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:58 am
Location: Oro Valley, Arizona
Contact:

Re: Texas judge strikes entire Affordable Care Act

#10 Post by Bob Juch » Mon Dec 17, 2018 12:11 pm

BackInTex wrote:
Bob78164 wrote:
BackInTex wrote:The entire thing is silly. Roberts said the ACA was constitutional (specifically the individual mandate) because is was a "tax". It is not. A tax is not a penalty for non-performance. It is a penalty. There never was a tax.
As a matter of fact, you're wrong about that specific point. The Court has frequently justified "penalties" of exactly the sort you describe as exercises of Congressional taxing power. --Bob
I'm not wrong. The Court is, if they call a penalty a tax. But you used the word "justified" and that is very different than "defines". Please think for yourself. Do YOU think a penalty is a tax?
The SCOTUS has the final word, it doesn't matter what you think.
I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I needed to be.
- Douglas Adams (1952 - 2001)

Si fractum non sit, noli id reficere.

Teach a child to be polite and courteous in the home and, when he grows up, he'll never be able to drive in New Jersey.

User avatar
BackInTex
Posts: 12780
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:43 pm
Location: In Texas of course!

Re: Texas judge strikes entire Affordable Care Act

#11 Post by BackInTex » Mon Dec 17, 2018 12:35 pm

Bob Juch wrote:
BackInTex wrote:
Bob78164 wrote:As a matter of fact, you're wrong about that specific point. The Court has frequently justified "penalties" of exactly the sort you describe as exercises of Congressional taxing power. --Bob
I'm not wrong. The Court is, if they call a penalty a tax. But you used the word "justified" and that is very different than "defines". Please think for yourself. Do YOU think a penalty is a tax?
The SCOTUS has the final word, it doesn't matter what you think.
Dred Scott would disagree.
..what country can preserve it’s liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? let them take arms.
~~ Thomas Jefferson

User avatar
littlebeast13
Dumbass
Posts: 31103
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 7:20 pm
Location: Between the Sterilite and the Farberware
Contact:

Re: Texas judge strikes entire Affordable Care Act

#12 Post by littlebeast13 » Mon Dec 17, 2018 12:44 pm

BackInTex wrote:
Bob Juch wrote:
BackInTex wrote:
I'm not wrong. The Court is, if they call a penalty a tax. But you used the word "justified" and that is very different than "defines". Please think for yourself. Do YOU think a penalty is a tax?
The SCOTUS has the final word, it doesn't matter what you think.
Dred Scott would disagree.

No he wouldn't! He's dead...

lb13
Thursday comics! Squirrel pictures! The link to my CafePress store! All kinds of fun stuff!!!!

Visit my Evil Squirrel blog here: http://evilsquirrelsnest.com

User avatar
BackInTex
Posts: 12780
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:43 pm
Location: In Texas of course!

Re: Texas judge strikes entire Affordable Care Act

#13 Post by BackInTex » Mon Dec 17, 2018 2:16 pm

littlebeast13 wrote:
BackInTex wrote:
Bob Juch wrote: The SCOTUS has the final word, it doesn't matter what you think.
Dred Scott would disagree.

No he wouldn't! He's dead...

lb13
Have you seen the body? I haven't.
..what country can preserve it’s liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? let them take arms.
~~ Thomas Jefferson

User avatar
silverscreenselect
Posts: 23174
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:21 pm
Contact:

Re: Texas judge strikes entire Affordable Care Act

#14 Post by silverscreenselect » Mon Dec 17, 2018 2:23 pm

BackInTex wrote:Have you seen the body? I haven't.
It's right next to Jimmy Hoffa.
Check out our website: http://www.silverscreenvideos.com

Post Reply