Hey WB
-
wbtravis007
- Posts: 1363
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:15 pm
- Location: Skipperville, Tx.
Re: Hey WB
WOOOOOOO(kus)-HOOOOOO!Beebs52 wrote:I used wookus.
You are very funny. I'm gonna have to start making sure that I check out your blog regularly.
You mentioned cigar toys and revisionist history. That reminded me of something that I'm pretty sure that I heard somewhere from a very reliable source. It has to do with all that Monica stuff. Turns out that a good bit of that happened in the winow-sill area of the Oval Office that everybody's seen pictures of.
The main reason that Bubba figured that all of that was rated PG -- (or, at worst PG13) -- was that he reckoned that he could just explain that it was "Just sex, you all, in ya' window."
Or something like that.
(I know ... it needs work.)
-
wbtravis007
- Posts: 1363
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:15 pm
- Location: Skipperville, Tx.
No. Nothing like that. Trust me on this: don't waste time trying to figure it out. It was really weak -- too much of a stretch.Beebs52 wrote:Thenks everso. I'm exhibiting my ignorance because I'm assuming the window stuff has something to do with Britney or a similar poptart?
The reference was to what's used sometimes as an explanation for a PG or PG-13 rating: "sexual innuendo."
-
wbtravis007
- Posts: 1363
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:15 pm
- Location: Skipperville, Tx.
Yes, and a very good word indeed.Beebs52 wrote:Well that's scary. I've lost all intuitive innuendic abilities. Must work on that.
At least innuendic may be a new word, right?
Reminds me of the time here when I asserted that I was endowed with extraordinary patheticism.
That was after "someone" mentioned that she had engaged in, a time or two, a "mercy [something]."
Didn't work, though.
l