Lost finale?
- MarleysGh0st
- Posts: 27930
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:55 am
- Location: Elsewhere
Lost finale?
So is the actual season finale one hour at 10 pm tonight? With the shows at 8 and 9 just repeats? Or is it a one-hour repeat and then a two-hour finale?
- themanintheseersuckersuit
- Posts: 7619
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 6:37 pm
- Location: South Carolina
9 to 11 is the new show
Suitguy is not bitter.
feels he represents the many educated and rational onlookers who believe that the hysterical denouncement of lay scepticism is both unwarranted and counter-productive
The problem, then, is that such calls do not address an opposition audience so much as they signal virtue. They talk past those who need convincing. They ignore actual facts and counterargument. And they are irreparably smug.
feels he represents the many educated and rational onlookers who believe that the hysterical denouncement of lay scepticism is both unwarranted and counter-productive
The problem, then, is that such calls do not address an opposition audience so much as they signal virtue. They talk past those who need convincing. They ignore actual facts and counterargument. And they are irreparably smug.
- gsabc
- Posts: 6487
- Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 8:03 am
- Location: Federal Bureaucracy City
- Contact:
- silverscreenselect
- Posts: 23297
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:21 pm
- Contact:
The finale is actually 9-11. I believe they have broken it up into two dramatically separable episodes (ie, different central themes and character flashback/forward) rather than one organic two hour episode. When you check the opening credits, you might see that they have two separate sets of credited writers and directors for each half.
- MarleysGh0st
- Posts: 27930
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:55 am
- Location: Elsewhere
Thanks for the clarification, everyone!
NIMHO. An episode should be an episode. Adding a couple minutes of new footage to get us to watch a repeat is a cheap trick.Catfish wrote:The ad also promises new footage of last week's episode in that first hour. I wonder whether the additions make it worth viewing again.
- gsabc
- Posts: 6487
- Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 8:03 am
- Location: Federal Bureaucracy City
- Contact:
Tell that to the marketers flogging the latest re-issue of the Indiana Jones movies.MarleysGh0st wrote:Thanks for the clarification, everyone!
NIMHO. An episode should be an episode. Adding a couple minutes of new footage to get us to watch a repeat is a cheap trick.Catfish wrote:The ad also promises new footage of last week's episode in that first hour. I wonder whether the additions make it worth viewing again.
I just ordered chicken and an egg from Amazon. I'll let you know.
- ghostjmf
- Posts: 7421
- Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 11:09 am
Marley says:
I agree. I can respect a newly released "director's cut" of a movie they feel the producers butchered over their objections, but nobody is butchering this TV show, I don't think. I know the people in control have said they "would have told us more about the people on the boat" if there hadn't been a writer's strike, but unless the episode is extremely different, are we going to miss anything we need to know before the finale? That would be a bad editing idea they made for the original broadcast, & their own fault.
NIMHO. An episode should be an episode. Adding a couple minutes of new footage to get us to watch a repeat is a cheap trick.
I agree. I can respect a newly released "director's cut" of a movie they feel the producers butchered over their objections, but nobody is butchering this TV show, I don't think. I know the people in control have said they "would have told us more about the people on the boat" if there hadn't been a writer's strike, but unless the episode is extremely different, are we going to miss anything we need to know before the finale? That would be a bad editing idea they made for the original broadcast, & their own fault.
- MarleysGh0st
- Posts: 27930
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:55 am
- Location: Elsewhere
I posted my thoughts about The Kingdom of the Crystal Skull in that other thread and got pounded by Saucy, so I think I'll keep quiet about that now.gsabc wrote:Tell that to the marketers flogging the latest re-issue of the Indiana Jones movies.MarleysGh0st wrote:Thanks for the clarification, everyone!
NIMHO. An episode should be an episode. Adding a couple minutes of new footage to get us to watch a repeat is a cheap trick.Catfish wrote:The ad also promises new footage of last week's episode in that first hour. I wonder whether the additions make it worth viewing again.
- silverscreenselect
- Posts: 23297
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:21 pm
- Contact:
Because TV shows have to fit in a 30 or 60 minute time slot, there are always scenes that get cut out or shortened to make the time fit (There is about 41-42 minutes of actual footage on an average 60 minute show now, and that includes the opening credits)
So they can always come up with a scene that's a bit longer than what was shown originally and tout it as "new footage." Usually the "new" footage winds up replacing either coming attractions or the recap of previous shows. G-I-M-M-I-C-K
So they can always come up with a scene that's a bit longer than what was shown originally and tout it as "new footage." Usually the "new" footage winds up replacing either coming attractions or the recap of previous shows. G-I-M-M-I-C-K
- silverscreenselect
- Posts: 23297
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:21 pm
- Contact:
The trend now is to release "unrated" versions of R- or PG-13 rated films to boost DVD sales. These unrated versions usually add a few seconds to a couple of minutes of gratuitous nudity or violence or, occasionally, language. If you want to here Bruce Willis do all the cussing in Die Hard 4, get the unrated DVD.ghostjmf wrote: I agree. I can respect a newly released "director's cut" of a movie they feel the producers butchered over their objections, but nobody is butchering this TV show, I don't think.
In most cases, you haven't missed much. Some movies do have longer cuts which are substantially different from the theatrical versions. Both Troy and Kingdom of Heaven have far more entertaining director's cuts available. Alexander is available in about four different versions, none of them any good. The definitive DVD of Blade Runner released a few months ago has a number of variations as well, I believe.
- a1mamacat
- Posts: 6943
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 6:02 pm
- Location: Great White North
pounded? Pounded?? POUNDED???MarleysGh0st wrote:I posted my thoughts about The Kingdom of the Crystal Skull in that other thread and got pounded by Saucy, so I think I'll keep quiet about that now.gsabc wrote:Tell that to the marketers flogging the latest re-issue of the Indiana Jones movies.MarleysGh0st wrote:Thanks for the clarification, everyone!
NIMHO. An episode should be an episode. Adding a couple minutes of new footage to get us to watch a repeat is a cheap trick.
I don't Pound...Pounce perhaps, but never pound
Lover of Soft Animals and Fine Art
1st annual international BBBL Champeeeeen!
1st annual international BBBL Champeeeeen!
- ghostjmf
- Posts: 7421
- Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 11:09 am
SSS says:
(very big spoiler here; if you've never seen the movie, please don't read it)
The definitive DVD of Blade Runner is one I would actually go for (as rental-not-buy, as I don't generally buy movies; my sister the designated film fan has actually never seen this, & in my estimation needs to); the director is on record as saying, as people have suspected all along, "they changed the ending". And also removed some clues to something that a science fiction fan had no problem sussing out anyway, namely thatThe definitive DVD of Blade Runner released a few months ago has a number of variations as well, I believe.
(very big spoiler here; if you've never seen the movie, please don't read it)
Spoiler
Ford's character (Deckard?) is really a replicant himself.
- MarleysGh0st
- Posts: 27930
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:55 am
- Location: Elsewhere
Maybe you don't know your own strength.a1mamacat wrote:pounded? Pounded?? POUNDED???MarleysGh0st wrote:I posted my thoughts about The Kingdom of the Crystal Skull in that other thread and got pounded by Saucy, so I think I'll keep quiet about that now.gsabc wrote: Tell that to the marketers flogging the latest re-issue of the Indiana Jones movies.
I don't Pound...Pounce perhaps, but never pound