silverscreenselect wrote: ↑Sun Jan 21, 2024 9:25 pm
flockofseagulls104 wrote: ↑Sun Jan 21, 2024 9:19 pm
I doubt you've seen the twitter history of the woman who you said he 'raped', when no court says he did. I thought you were a lawyer. Above or below average?
You're right. The court found that she hadn't proved that Trump raped her, but she had proved that he sexually abused her. I'm sure you're very proud of that distinction.
So why the fuck are you going around saying that Trump raped someone? What kind of lawyer are you? Why should we believe anything you say using your supposed mantle of 'attorney'?
No, I disagree with the jury in the US District Court of Southern New York case. I don't think it ever happened. So, whatabout Juanita Brodderick?
Crimes must generally be proved "beyond a reasonable doubt," whereas civil cases are proved by lower standards of proof, such as "the preponderance of the evidence."
The term, "the preponderance of evidence," refers to how it was more likely than not that something occurred in a certain way.
The only 'evidence' she could produce was correspondence from that time. She could not even remember any details. But she knew at the time he was a rich celebrity. That, combined with the fact of her sordid twitter history (which I don't believe the jury knew about) and the preponderance of TDS in the 'SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK', lead me to believe that she was convinced to do this. Now, not then, and not anytime in between, but NOW. Along with the onslaught of all the other lawfare. Like all the other lawfare cases, they didn't care whether they won or lost the actual case. Either way, it was a win for them. No downside. And I believe it never really ever happened. That's my opinion. Based upon a preponderance of evidence. But I don't live in NYC anymore, and I probably know more than they were presented. And I don't have a biased judge directing me. And I don't have TDS.
Oh, a little evidence?
A couple of weeks after the New York magazine article was published, Carroll ran into lawyer George Conway (a Trump critic and husband of Kellyanne Conway), who told her to file a defamation lawsuit and helped her find a lawyer. Conway then wrote an op-ed for The Washington Post encouraging readers to believe Carroll.[21]
Who is funding her legal team?
Time for a little whataboutism?
So what about Juanita? Et al, I will add. (How about Epstein?) How come no trials for Bill? Haven't heard much outrage from you and yours on that subject...
All I see from your side is desperate, unsuccessful attempts to somehow link Trump to Epstein. And baseless slandering with false charges of being guilty of rape. Maybe Trump should sue you for defamation on the bored. Might get 50 cents. But I guess all those things are baseless allegations and everything E. Jean Carroll says is gospel.