A game play suggestion

Message

#1 Post by **eyégor** » Thu Oct 11, 2007 8:30 pm

If players post their answers using spoiler tags. then they won't be visible unless someone intentionally looks at them.

Just a thought.

SportsFan68 · #2 Post by **SportsFan68** » Thu Oct 11, 2007 8:58 pm

eyégor wrote:If players post their answers using spoiler tags. then they won't be visible unless someone intentionally looks at them.

Just a thought.

I agree wholeheartedly with this suggestion.

TheCalvinator24 · #3 Post by **TheCalvinator24** » Thu Oct 11, 2007 9:01 pm

Spoiler

Sounds like a good idea, but I can guarantee that many will forget to tag their answers.

I don't understand why there is any greate problem than ever. Is the game host puts spoiler space in the question post, then the answers wouldn't be seen anyway.

SportsFan68 · #4 Post by **SportsFan68** » Thu Oct 11, 2007 9:02 pm

TheCalvinator24 wrote:
Spoiler
Sounds like a good idea, but I can guarantee that many will forget to tag their answers.
I don't understand why there is any greate problem than ever. Is the game host puts spoiler space in the question post, then the answers wouldn't be seen anyway.

Holy cow! I barely got here, and Cal's disagreeing with me already!!

Just like old times.

TheCalvinator24 · #5 Post by **TheCalvinator24** » Thu Oct 11, 2007 9:05 pm

SportsFan68 wrote:
TheCalvinator24 wrote:
Spoiler
Sounds like a good idea, but I can guarantee that many will forget to tag their answers.
I don't understand why there is any greate problem than ever. Is the game host puts spoiler space in the question post, then the answers wouldn't be seen anyway.
Holy cow! I barely got here, and Cal's disagreeing with me already!!

Just like old times.

I'm not really disagreeing.

Or I'm not really being disagreeable.

Or we're not really in disagreement.

Or something like that.

I do think it's a good suggestion.

I'm just not sure why it's a bigger problem her than it was before.

SportsFan68 · #6 Post by **SportsFan68** » Thu Oct 11, 2007 9:08 pm

TheCalvinator24 wrote: I do think it's a good suggestion.

I'm just not sure why it's a bigger problem her than it was before.

Because there's no flat view, post to post. It's easy to go zooming with the speed of light into stuff you may not want to view in threaded view, even with spoiler space.

How come you changed your avatar back?

I'm gonna leave mine as The Purple Row until we win the Series, or don't.

TheCalvinator24 · #7 Post by **TheCalvinator24** » Thu Oct 11, 2007 9:36 pm

SportsFan68 wrote: How come you changed your avatar back?

I wanted to, and I wasn't afraid.

The pic is still up on my blog The Short, Bright Teatime of My Soul

peacock2121 · #8 Post by **peacock2121** » Fri Oct 12, 2007 4:30 am

Why doesn't everyone just use quote when they answer - solves all problems.

christie1111 · #9 Post by **christie1111** » Fri Oct 12, 2007 6:55 am

But how do you do the spoiler thingie?

I see how to hide/unhide but how do you put that in your reply?

It is early over here.

MarleysGh0st · #10 Post by **MarleysGh0st** » Fri Oct 12, 2007 7:03 am

christie1111 wrote:But how do you do the spoiler thingie?

I see how to hide/unhide but how do you put that in your reply?

It is early over here.

When you open the reply window, there are a row of buttons under the subject line, starting with B i and u. The rightmost one is "Spoiler".

Type your text, highlight it with your mouse, then click the Spoiler button.

Spoiler

Like this.

peacock2121 · #11 Post by **peacock2121** » Fri Oct 12, 2007 7:19 am

Spoiler

Okay - can someone tell me why this is better than responding by quoting?

#12 Post by **eyégor** » Fri Oct 12, 2007 7:26 am

peacock2121 wrote:
Spoiler
Okay - can someone tell me why this is better than responding by quoting?

Spoiler

Because this way there is less chance of inadvertently seeing someone else's answer because it is actually hidden

MarleysGh0st · #13 Post by **MarleysGh0st** » Fri Oct 12, 2007 7:32 am

peacock2121 wrote: Okay - can someone tell me why this is better than responding by quoting?

The object is to avoid seeing anyone else's answer, when the Bored only serves entire threads instead of individual messages. There have been three different suggestions to handle this.

1. Contestants responding using the spoiler button.
2. Host adding the old-fashioned spoiler space to the bottom of the thread
.
.
.
.
.
3. Contestants responding by quoting.

The problem with the #3 is that one might still get an inadvertant glance at someone else's answer, particularly if the original message is short. #1 relies on each contestant remembering to use the spoiler button. #2 only relies on the host remembering to add the spoiler space.

But all three are reasonably workable solutions. if folks are consistent in using them.

peacock2121 · #14 Post by **peacock2121** » Fri Oct 12, 2007 7:32 am

Is there some way for me to see answers without scrolling down? I mean, it seems that it would be hard for it to be by accident, unless there is someway to get around this bored that I haven't figured out yet.

PlacentiaSoccerMom · #15 Post by **PlacentiaSoccerMom** » Fri Oct 12, 2007 7:32 am

peacock2121 wrote:
Spoiler
Okay - can someone tell me why this is better than responding by quoting?

Spoiler

On some computers, like mine, using the quote tag and changing the font color doesn't hide answers. I can still see them. I can't see the answers when the spoiler tag is used.

peacock2121 · #16 Post by **peacock2121** » Fri Oct 12, 2007 7:34 am

I don't think I have ever seen a second post in a thread without scrolling down.

Doesn't mean I haven't, just seems to me that the avatar and the header of the bored prevents that.

Bob Juch · #17 Post by **Bob Juch** » Fri Oct 12, 2007 8:24 am

peacock2121 wrote:I don't think I have ever seen a second post in a thread without scrolling down.

Doesn't mean I haven't, just seems to me that the avatar and the header of the bored prevents that.

You apparently have a small screen size. Mine is 1920x1200.

peacock2121 · #18 Post by **peacock2121** » Fri Oct 12, 2007 8:27 am

Bob Juch wrote:
peacock2121 wrote:I don't think I have ever seen a second post in a thread without scrolling down.

Doesn't mean I haven't, just seems to me that the avatar and the header of the bored prevents that.
You apparently have a small screen size. Mine is 1920x1200.

apparently

I have yet to find a post where I do not have to scroll down to see the second post in a thread.

Bob Juch · #19 Post by **Bob Juch** » Fri Oct 12, 2007 8:31 am

peacock2121 wrote:
Bob Juch wrote:
peacock2121 wrote:I don't think I have ever seen a second post in a thread without scrolling down.

Doesn't mean I haven't, just seems to me that the avatar and the header of the bored prevents that.
You apparently have a small screen size. Mine is 1920x1200.
apparently

I have yet to find a post where I do not have to scroll down to see the second post in a thread.

I see three at once.

silvercamaro · #20 Post by **silvercamaro** » Fri Oct 12, 2007 8:34 am

Spoiler

I needed to check this out for myself.

Spoiler

I never take anybody's word for anything.

Spoiler

I'm stubborn that way.

#21 Post by **littlebeast13** » Fri Oct 12, 2007 8:39 am

Bob Juch wrote:
peacock2121 wrote:
Bob Juch wrote: You apparently have a small screen size. Mine is 1920x1200.
apparently

I have yet to find a post where I do not have to scroll down to see the second post in a thread.
I see three at once.

This is like an infinite regression....

lb13

Bob Juch · #22 Post by **Bob Juch** » Fri Oct 12, 2007 9:28 am

littlebeast13 wrote:
Bob Juch wrote:
peacock2121 wrote: apparently

I have yet to find a post where I do not have to scroll down to see the second post in a thread.
I see three at once.
This is like an infinite regression....

lb13

Some people are regressing.

NellyLunatic1980 · #23 Post by **NellyLunatic1980** » Fri Oct 12, 2007 9:58 am

Spoiler

I'm only 27, but I feel as if my brain has been regressing for the last 9 years

hermillion · #24 Post by **hermillion** » Mon Oct 15, 2007 9:05 pm

Trying this out for myself.

Spoiler

Did it work?

Yippee!

Now let's play some games . . .

WWTBAM Bored

A game play suggestion

A game play suggestion

Re: A game play suggestion

Sorry to be stoopid

Re: Sorry to be stoopid