Texas judge strikes entire Affordable Care Act
- Bob78164
- Bored Moderator
- Posts: 21677
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:02 pm
- Location: By the phone
Texas judge strikes entire Affordable Care Act
Republicans have won at least a temporary victory in their efforts to deprive millions of Americans of health insurance. The Texas federal judge hearing the case struck down the entire Affordable Care Act based on Congress's decision a year ago to remove the tax penalty for failure to comply with the individual mandate. He concluded that even though Congress did not repeal the rest of the law, the Act was inseverable so that Congress implicitly did what it failed to do explicitly.
I do not know yet whether the judge stayed his ruling in anticipation of an appeal. There will be one. --Bob
I do not know yet whether the judge stayed his ruling in anticipation of an appeal. There will be one. --Bob
"Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason than that of blindfolded fear." Thomas Jefferson
- Bob78164
- Bored Moderator
- Posts: 21677
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:02 pm
- Location: By the phone
Re: Texas judge strikes entire Affordable Care Act
I haven’t yet found a link to the opinion so I can read it for myself, but based on descriptions of its reasoning it’s every bit as stupid as I expected. Pure result-motivated judicial activism. Fortunately, I’m pretty sure that even the conservative Fifth Circuit will reverse the ruling so the damage should be limited. —Bob
"Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason than that of blindfolded fear." Thomas Jefferson
- jarnon
- Posts: 6374
- Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 9:52 pm
- Location: Merion, Pa.
Re: Texas judge strikes entire Affordable Care Act
Here you go:Bob78164 wrote:I haven’t yet found a link to the opinion so I can read it for myself.
State of Texas v. United States of America
My non-expert refutation:
Judge O'Connor states that the individual mandate and the penalty are separate provisions. That may have been true in the ACA as originally enacted. But the Chief Justice ruled that the individual mandate, based on the commerce clause, is unconstitutional (a decision that Bob hates), so only the penalty remained. Then Congress removed the penalty, so there's no individual mandate any more.
That misconception appears twice in the judge's opinion. In his mind, the plaintiffs have standing because the individual mandate is still part of the law. Also, he believes Congress had no intent to repeal the individual mandate, just the tax, even though that's not what Congress said.
He also thinks that the individual mandate penalty is inseverable from rest of law. But that's clearly not what Congress intended, since they repealed the penalty but not the whole law. And previous court cases have invalidated other parts of the ACA without overturning the whole law.
Last edited by jarnon on Sun Dec 16, 2018 11:32 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Слава Україні!
עם ישראל חי
עם ישראל חי
- Bob78164
- Bored Moderator
- Posts: 21677
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:02 pm
- Location: By the phone
Re: Texas judge strikes entire Affordable Care Act
That second part is his fundamental gross error of law. He focused on the intent of the 2010 Congress, which is irrelevant. What's relevant is whether Congress intended to repeal the rest of the Affordable Care Act in 2017 when it eliminated the penalty for the individual mandate. (I have no idea, by the way, how he concluded that the individual mandate is still part of the law at all since as far as I know there's no consequence whatsoever for violating it (other than being uninsured, of course).) And we know damn well that Congress didn't intend to repeal the rest of the Affordable Care Act when it zeroed out the penalty for violating the individual mandate because Congress didn't repeal the rest of the Affordable Care Act when it zeroed out the penalty for violating the individual mandate. --Bobjarnon wrote:My non-expert refutation:
Judge O'Connor states that the individual mandate and the penalty are separate provisions. That may have been true in the ACA as originally enacted. But the Chief Justice ruled that the individual mandate, based on the commerce clause, is unconstitutional, so only the penalty remained. Then Congress removed the penalty, so there's no individual mandate any more.
That misconception appears twice in the judge's opinion. In his mind, the plaintiffs have standing because the individual mandate is still part of the law. Also, he believes Congress had no intent to repeal the individual mandate, just the tax, even though that's not what Congress said.
He also thinks that the individual mandate penalty is inseverable from rest of law. But that's clearly not what Congress intended, since they repealed the penalty but not the whole law. And previous court cases have invalidated other parts of the ACA without overturning the whole law.
"Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason than that of blindfolded fear." Thomas Jefferson
- BackInTex
- Posts: 12870
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:43 pm
- Location: In Texas of course!
Re: Texas judge strikes entire Affordable Care Act
The entire thing is silly. Roberts said the ACA was constitutional (specifically the individual mandate) because is was a "tax". It is not. A tax is not a penalty for non-performance. It is a penalty. There never was a tax.
..what country can preserve it’s liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? let them take arms.
~~ Thomas Jefferson
War is where the government tells you who the bad guy is.
Revolution is when you decide that for yourself.
-- Benjamin Franklin (maybe)
~~ Thomas Jefferson
War is where the government tells you who the bad guy is.
Revolution is when you decide that for yourself.
-- Benjamin Franklin (maybe)
- Bob78164
- Bored Moderator
- Posts: 21677
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:02 pm
- Location: By the phone
Re: Texas judge strikes entire Affordable Care Act
As a matter of fact, you're wrong about that specific point. The Court has frequently justified "penalties" of exactly the sort you describe as exercises of Congressional taxing power. --BobBackInTex wrote:The entire thing is silly. Roberts said the ACA was constitutional (specifically the individual mandate) because is was a "tax". It is not. A tax is not a penalty for non-performance. It is a penalty. There never was a tax.
"Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason than that of blindfolded fear." Thomas Jefferson
- BackInTex
- Posts: 12870
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:43 pm
- Location: In Texas of course!
Re: Texas judge strikes entire Affordable Care Act
I'm not wrong. The Court is, if they call a penalty a tax. But you used the word "justified" and that is very different than "defines". Please think for yourself. Do YOU think a penalty is a tax?Bob78164 wrote:As a matter of fact, you're wrong about that specific point. The Court has frequently justified "penalties" of exactly the sort you describe as exercises of Congressional taxing power. --BobBackInTex wrote:The entire thing is silly. Roberts said the ACA was constitutional (specifically the individual mandate) because is was a "tax". It is not. A tax is not a penalty for non-performance. It is a penalty. There never was a tax.
..what country can preserve it’s liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? let them take arms.
~~ Thomas Jefferson
War is where the government tells you who the bad guy is.
Revolution is when you decide that for yourself.
-- Benjamin Franklin (maybe)
~~ Thomas Jefferson
War is where the government tells you who the bad guy is.
Revolution is when you decide that for yourself.
-- Benjamin Franklin (maybe)
- jarnon
- Posts: 6374
- Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 9:52 pm
- Location: Merion, Pa.
Re: Texas judge strikes entire Affordable Care Act
Other penalties, like for IRA withdrawals, seem to me to be a tax. And paying for Social Security and Medicare, even though they’re retirement investments, are taxes too. The government uses various names like duty, tariff, fee, etc., but in my mind they’re all taxes. The only government payment that doesn’t seem like a tax is when you’re paying for a product or service like admission to a national park.BackInTex wrote:I'm not wrong. The Court is, if they call a penalty a tax. But you used the word "justified" and that is very different than "defines". Please think for yourself. Do YOU think a penalty is a tax?
Слава Україні!
עם ישראל חי
עם ישראל חי
- jarnon
- Posts: 6374
- Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 9:52 pm
- Location: Merion, Pa.
Re: Texas judge strikes entire Affordable Care Act
Locally, the fees for a parking permit, dog license and burglar alarm feel like taxes, but the fees for pool membership and trash pickup don’t. That’s just my opinion (see I can think for myself). But the only opinion that counts is John Roberts’s.
Слава Україні!
עם ישראל חי
עם ישראל חי
- Bob Juch
- Posts: 26525
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:58 am
- Location: Oro Valley, Arizona
- Contact:
Re: Texas judge strikes entire Affordable Care Act
The SCOTUS has the final word, it doesn't matter what you think.BackInTex wrote:I'm not wrong. The Court is, if they call a penalty a tax. But you used the word "justified" and that is very different than "defines". Please think for yourself. Do YOU think a penalty is a tax?Bob78164 wrote:As a matter of fact, you're wrong about that specific point. The Court has frequently justified "penalties" of exactly the sort you describe as exercises of Congressional taxing power. --BobBackInTex wrote:The entire thing is silly. Roberts said the ACA was constitutional (specifically the individual mandate) because is was a "tax". It is not. A tax is not a penalty for non-performance. It is a penalty. There never was a tax.
I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I needed to be.
- Douglas Adams (1952 - 2001)
Si fractum non sit, noli id reficere.
Teach a child to be polite and courteous in the home and, when he grows up, he'll never be able to drive in New Jersey.
- Douglas Adams (1952 - 2001)
Si fractum non sit, noli id reficere.
Teach a child to be polite and courteous in the home and, when he grows up, he'll never be able to drive in New Jersey.
- BackInTex
- Posts: 12870
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:43 pm
- Location: In Texas of course!
Re: Texas judge strikes entire Affordable Care Act
Dred Scott would disagree.Bob Juch wrote:The SCOTUS has the final word, it doesn't matter what you think.BackInTex wrote:I'm not wrong. The Court is, if they call a penalty a tax. But you used the word "justified" and that is very different than "defines". Please think for yourself. Do YOU think a penalty is a tax?Bob78164 wrote:As a matter of fact, you're wrong about that specific point. The Court has frequently justified "penalties" of exactly the sort you describe as exercises of Congressional taxing power. --Bob
..what country can preserve it’s liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? let them take arms.
~~ Thomas Jefferson
War is where the government tells you who the bad guy is.
Revolution is when you decide that for yourself.
-- Benjamin Franklin (maybe)
~~ Thomas Jefferson
War is where the government tells you who the bad guy is.
Revolution is when you decide that for yourself.
-- Benjamin Franklin (maybe)
- littlebeast13
- Dumbass
- Posts: 31136
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 7:20 pm
- Location: Between the Sterilite and the Farberware
- Contact:
Re: Texas judge strikes entire Affordable Care Act
BackInTex wrote:Dred Scott would disagree.Bob Juch wrote:The SCOTUS has the final word, it doesn't matter what you think.BackInTex wrote:
I'm not wrong. The Court is, if they call a penalty a tax. But you used the word "justified" and that is very different than "defines". Please think for yourself. Do YOU think a penalty is a tax?
No he wouldn't! He's dead...
lb13
Thursday comics! Squirrel pictures! The link to my CafePress store! All kinds of fun stuff!!!!
Visit my Evil Squirrel blog here: http://evilsquirrelsnest.com
Visit my Evil Squirrel blog here: http://evilsquirrelsnest.com
- BackInTex
- Posts: 12870
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:43 pm
- Location: In Texas of course!
Re: Texas judge strikes entire Affordable Care Act
Have you seen the body? I haven't.littlebeast13 wrote:BackInTex wrote:Dred Scott would disagree.Bob Juch wrote: The SCOTUS has the final word, it doesn't matter what you think.
No he wouldn't! He's dead...
lb13
..what country can preserve it’s liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? let them take arms.
~~ Thomas Jefferson
War is where the government tells you who the bad guy is.
Revolution is when you decide that for yourself.
-- Benjamin Franklin (maybe)
~~ Thomas Jefferson
War is where the government tells you who the bad guy is.
Revolution is when you decide that for yourself.
-- Benjamin Franklin (maybe)
- silverscreenselect
- Posts: 23442
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:21 pm
- Contact:
Re: Texas judge strikes entire Affordable Care Act
It's right next to Jimmy Hoffa.BackInTex wrote:Have you seen the body? I haven't.
Check out our website: http://www.silverscreenvideos.com