How do you cast half a vote? (political)
-
- Posts: 1248
- Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 7:25 pm
- Location: Michigan
How do you cast half a vote? (political)
The DNC rules committee had their meeting on what to do with the disputed delegates from Michigan and Florida today. After some 10 hours of discussion, they voted. I saw the voting on CNN. Florida got stripped of all its' delegates. They tried to pass a motion that would have given Florida's delegates 1/2 vote each, but it didn't pass.
Then came Michigan. They passed a motion giving Michigan's delegation (69 pledged to HRCm 59 to Obama) 1/2 vote per delegate. How do you cast 1/2 a vote?????
Harold Ickes doesn't like this, and he's threatening to go to the Credentials Committee at the convention in August. Stay tuned-the fat lady is warming up!
Then came Michigan. They passed a motion giving Michigan's delegation (69 pledged to HRCm 59 to Obama) 1/2 vote per delegate. How do you cast 1/2 a vote?????
Harold Ickes doesn't like this, and he's threatening to go to the Credentials Committee at the convention in August. Stay tuned-the fat lady is warming up!
I'm just a game show nerd.
- Bob Juch
- Posts: 26750
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:58 am
- Location: Oro Valley, Arizona
- Contact:
I'd say the fat lady has left the building.
I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I needed to be.
- Douglas Adams (1952 - 2001)
Si fractum non sit, noli id reficere.
Teach a child to be polite and courteous in the home and, when he grows up, he'll never be able to drive in New Jersey.
- Douglas Adams (1952 - 2001)
Si fractum non sit, noli id reficere.
Teach a child to be polite and courteous in the home and, when he grows up, he'll never be able to drive in New Jersey.
- mellytu74
- Posts: 9443
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 7:02 pm
- Location: Philadelphia, PA
Kazoo, the DNC sat both state delegations at half-vote for each delegate.
So, as I write this, Obama needs 65 delegates to clinch the nomination.
Jim Roosevelt and Alexis Herman, the chairs of the credentials committee, are the same two people who are the chairs of the rules committee.
The fat lady has sung, gotten out of costume and is in the taxicab going home.
So, as I write this, Obama needs 65 delegates to clinch the nomination.
Jim Roosevelt and Alexis Herman, the chairs of the credentials committee, are the same two people who are the chairs of the rules committee.
The fat lady has sung, gotten out of costume and is in the taxicab going home.
- hf_jai
- Posts: 496
- Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 1:31 pm
- Location: Stilwell KS
- Contact:
- BigDrawMan
- Posts: 2286
- Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 2:17 pm
- Location: paris of the appalachians
- SportsFan68
- No Scritches!!!
- Posts: 21180
- Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 8:36 pm
- Location: God's Country
We usta do it all the time here in Colorado just to send more people on to the next level. Then the State party got tired of dealing with it so asked us to please not do it unless we absolutely had to. Which we did, at the caucus level anyway, because everyone who meets the 15% threshold has to have representation at the County Assembly.
We had one caucus go more or less like this:
Total delegates present: 20
15% threshold: 3
Delegates allotted to County Assembly: 2
Raw votes (of the 20) for Obama: 10
Raw votes for Clinton: 5
Raw votes for Richardson: 5
Obama delegates: 1
Clinton delegates: .5
Richardson delegates: .5
Anyway, I doubt anybody in Colorado blinked at the half-vote concept.
We had one caucus go more or less like this:
Total delegates present: 20
15% threshold: 3
Delegates allotted to County Assembly: 2
Raw votes (of the 20) for Obama: 10
Raw votes for Clinton: 5
Raw votes for Richardson: 5
Obama delegates: 1
Clinton delegates: .5
Richardson delegates: .5
Anyway, I doubt anybody in Colorado blinked at the half-vote concept.
-- In Iroquois society, leaders are encouraged to remember seven generations in the past and consider seven generations in the future when making decisions that affect the people.
-- America would be a better place if leaders would do more long-term thinking. -- Wilma Mankiller
-- America would be a better place if leaders would do more long-term thinking. -- Wilma Mankiller
- earendel
- Posts: 13715
- Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 5:25 am
- Location: mired in the bureaucracy
Re: How do you cast half a vote? (political)
I'd be more sympathetic to Clinton if it hadn't been that originally her representatives supported the DNC when it warned states that they risked being disenfranchised if they moved their primaries up. NPR had a story on Saturday about this. The only reason she wants "every vote counted" is because it's her only chance of persuading the superdelegates that she's the one they should support.Kazoo65 wrote:The DNC rules committee had their meeting on what to do with the disputed delegates from Michigan and Florida today. After some 10 hours of discussion, they voted. I saw the voting on CNN. Florida got stripped of all its' delegates. They tried to pass a motion that would have given Florida's delegates 1/2 vote each, but it didn't pass.
Then came Michigan. They passed a motion giving Michigan's delegation (69 pledged to HRCm 59 to Obama) 1/2 vote per delegate. How do you cast 1/2 a vote?????
Harold Ickes doesn't like this, and he's threatening to go to the Credentials Committee at the convention in August. Stay tuned-the fat lady is warming up!
Now don't get me wrong - I think Clinton would be a good candidate, but it's rather disingenuous of her to want to count the votes now, because it benefits her. Were the shoe on the other foot I doubt she'd be clamoring for the delegations to be seated with full voting rights.
"Elen sila lumenn omentielvo...A star shines on the hour of our meeting."
- hf_jai
- Posts: 496
- Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 1:31 pm
- Location: Stilwell KS
- Contact:
On the other hand, if the shoe were on the other foot with Obama, he'd be screaming to the high heavens about disenfranchised black voters, especially in Florida. And you know what? He would be right.earendel wrote:Now don't get me wrong - I think Clinton would be a good candidate, but it's rather disingenuous of her to want to count the votes now, because it benefits her. Were the shoe on the other foot I doubt she'd be clamoring for the delegations to be seated with full voting rights.
Personally, I don't care much about Hillary's motives on this. I know lots of people who do the right thing for the wrong reasons. Or for self-serving reasons, if not exactly "wrong." At the end of the day, they are still doing the right thing and that's what matters most to the people who are affected by what is done.
The DNC was stupid to allow all this to occur, and stupider (?) still to punish the voters for the faults of the leadership. And all because they refused to stand up the the NH Sec of State (who, ironically, is a Republican).
- Jeemie
- Posts: 7303
- Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 5:35 pm
- Location: City of Champions Once More (Well, in spirit)!!!!
I don't get this- is the threshold to clinch the nomination more than a simple majority?
Or do Edwards, "Uncommitted", etc all have enough delegates to keep either Clinton or Obama from clinching before the convention?
I don't see how, in a two-person race (essentially) that neither can get enough delegates to clinch the thing outright.
Or do Edwards, "Uncommitted", etc all have enough delegates to keep either Clinton or Obama from clinching before the convention?
I don't see how, in a two-person race (essentially) that neither can get enough delegates to clinch the thing outright.
1979 City of Champions 2009
- earendel
- Posts: 13715
- Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 5:25 am
- Location: mired in the bureaucracy
Oh, there's no doubt that the DNC was stupid in allowing this to come to pass, but, to give them their due, it would have been total chaos had they not tried to put their collective foot down and keep the primaries from moving into the fall of 2007 (which might have happened as each state tried to move to the head of the line). If there were any rational thinkers on the DNC they would try and come up with some sort of regional primaries - not necessarily geographically balanced but balanced by electoral votes. 538/4 = 134.5, so have two primaries with states whose electoral votes total 134 and two with states totalling 135. Yes, it would be difficult but it could be done. Heck, one could even exempt Iowa and New Hampshire (11 electoral votes), allowing them to have their traditional role. Then rotate the order of the primaries so that one group doesn't get to be first each time.hf_jai wrote:On the other hand, if the shoe were on the other foot with Obama, he'd be screaming to the high heavens about disenfranchised black voters, especially in Florida. And you know what? He would be right.earendel wrote:Now don't get me wrong - I think Clinton would be a good candidate, but it's rather disingenuous of her to want to count the votes now, because it benefits her. Were the shoe on the other foot I doubt she'd be clamoring for the delegations to be seated with full voting rights.
Personally, I don't care much about Hillary's motives on this. I know lots of people who do the right thing for the wrong reasons. Or for self-serving reasons, if not exactly "wrong." At the end of the day, they are still doing the right thing and that's what matters most to the people who are affected by what is done.
The DNC was stupid to allow all this to occur, and stupider (?) still to punish the voters for the faults of the leadership. And all because they refused to stand up the the NH Sec of State (who, ironically, is a Republican).
If that's not manageable, then divide the states by the number of delegates to the DNC. There are better solutions, and it's about time someone started thinking about them so that the party doesn't have to go through this debacle again.
"Elen sila lumenn omentielvo...A star shines on the hour of our meeting."
- gsabc
- Posts: 6489
- Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 8:03 am
- Location: Federal Bureaucracy City
- Contact:
Neither has enough elected delegates to win outright. The superdelegates, who can in theory vote any which way they please, therefore control who will get a majority of all the delegates at the convention and the nomination. In reality, many are already pledging their convention vote to Obama or Clinton. The total of elected plus pledged delegates are the totals generally reported. Not all superdelegates have pledged, though, so neither candidate has a "majority" yet.Jeemie wrote:I don't get this- is the threshold to clinch the nomination more than a simple majority?
Or do Edwards, "Uncommitted", etc all have enough delegates to keep either Clinton or Obama from clinching before the convention?
I don't see how, in a two-person race (essentially) that neither can get enough delegates to clinch the thing outright.
Nothing stops the superdelegates from voting differently from their pledge at the convention. A few have already switched their pledge from one to the other. Again in theory, the convention could be interesting in that regard. In reality, barring major catastrophe, it won't happen in any significant manner.
I just ordered chicken and an egg from Amazon. I'll let you know.