Signs of desperation

[tlynn78]

You gotta love the "Trump's rhetoric is dangerous" people clutching their pearls over him calling someone stupid, when you've got the sitting President, his vice and current candidate, and other Dem "leaders" equating Trump to Hitler, and his supporters Nazis.

[Weyoun]

You gotta love the "Trump's rhetoric is dangerous" people clutching their pearls over him calling someone stupid, when you've got the sitting President, his vice and current candidate, and other Dem "leaders" equating Trump to Hitler, and his supporters Nazis.

The problem with your statement is that this is just not simple name-calling. It’s also backed up with facts and comments made by Trump. For example, when I call someone here stupid or wicked, I cite their statements they have said to support that.

Likewise, these folks are citing comments made by people who work for him saying that he is dangerous and power hungry. They quote him directly when he talks about how there should be a day of violence in the country and how we have to get rid of the blood poisoning and whatever.

Sometimes a fascist is just a fascist, and pointing that out does not make you a fascist too, or its equivalent.

[tlynn78]

You gotta love the "Trump's rhetoric is dangerous" people clutching their pearls over him calling someone stupid, when you've got the sitting President, his vice and current candidate, and other Dem "leaders" equating Trump to Hitler, and his supporters Nazis.

The problem with your statement is that this is just not simple name-calling. It’s also backed up with facts and comments made by Trump. For example, when I call someone here stupid or wicked, I cite their statements they have said to support that.

Likewise, these folks are citing comments made by people who work for him saying that he is dangerous and power hungry. They quote him directly when he talks about how there should be a day of violence in the country and how we have to get rid of the blood poisoning and whatever.

Sometimes a fascist is just a fascist, and pointing that out does not make you a fascist too, or its equivalent.

I see. So second and third- hand accounts from embittered former employees are fair game, even when many of those are contradicted by others present. Kind of like the $60,000 funeral lies?Now explain Hillary stating "Next week Trump is recreating the Nazi rally from 1939 at Madison Square Garden." I dont recall seeing anything instructing attendees to wear swastikas. She's clearly learned zero since her "deplorables" comment went over so well. And "power- hungry"? Lmao. The Left is so power hungry they've let their rhetoric nearly get their opponent killed twice.

Oh, and by 'quoting" him, do you mean like "calling neo-nazis very fine people"? Or maybe "we should inject people with bleach?"or perhaps when he said "[he] could go around assaulting women" ?

And when you, specifically, call someone here stupid or wicked (and more) and "cite their statements" what you've actually done is taken their statements and stirred them around in your mind with some sick little fantasies and spewed out the results.

[wbtravis007]

You gotta love the "Trump's rhetoric is dangerous" people clutching their pearls over him calling someone stupid, when you've got the sitting President, his vice and current candidate, and other Dem "leaders" equating Trump to Hitler, and his supporters Nazis.

The problem with your statement is that this is just not simple name-calling. It’s also backed up with facts and comments made by Trump. For example, when I call someone here stupid or wicked, I cite their statements they have said to support that.

Likewise, these folks are citing comments made by people who work for him saying that he is dangerous and power hungry. They quote him directly when he talks about how there should be a day of violence in the country and how we have to get rid of the blood poisoning and whatever.

Sometimes a fascist is just a fascist, and pointing that out does not make you a fascist too, or its equivalent.

I see. So second and third- hand accounts from embittered former employees are fair game, even when many of those are contradicted by others present. Kind of like the $60,000 funeral lies?Now explain Hillary stating "Next week Trump is recreating the Nazi rally from 1939 at Madison Square Garden." I dont recall seeing anything instructing attendees to wear swastikas. She's clearly learned zero since her "deplorables" comment went over so well. And "power- hungry"? Lmao. The Left is so power hungry they've let their rhetoric nearly get their opponent killed twice.

Oh, and by 'quoting" him, do you mean like "calling neo-nazis very fine people"? Or maybe "we should inject people with bleach?"or perhaps when he said "[he] could go around assaulting women" ?

And when you, specifically, call someone here stupid or wicked (and more) and "cite their statements" what you've actually done is taken their statements and stirred them around in your mind with some sick little fantasies and spewed out the results.

You actually wrote this sentence in a post where you also asserted that someone was stirring things “around in [their] mind with some sick little fantasies and spewed out the results”:

“The Left is so power hungry they've let their rhetoric nearly get their opponent killed twice.”

[tlynn78]

The problem with your statement is that this is just not simple name-calling. It’s also backed up with facts and comments made by Trump. For example, when I call someone here stupid or wicked, I cite their statements they have said to support that.

Likewise, these folks are citing comments made by people who work for him saying that he is dangerous and power hungry. They quote him directly when he talks about how there should be a day of violence in the country and how we have to get rid of the blood poisoning and whatever.

Sometimes a fascist is just a fascist, and pointing that out does not make you a fascist too, or its equivalent.

I see. So second and third- hand accounts from embittered former employees are fair game, even when many of those are contradicted by others present. Kind of like the $60,000 funeral lies?Now explain Hillary stating "Next week Trump is recreating the Nazi rally from 1939 at Madison Square Garden." I dont recall seeing anything instructing attendees to wear swastikas. She's clearly learned zero since her "deplorables" comment went over so well. And "power- hungry"? Lmao. The Left is so power hungry they've let their rhetoric nearly get their opponent killed twice.

Oh, and by 'quoting" him, do you mean like "calling neo-nazis very fine people"? Or maybe "we should inject people with bleach?"or perhaps when he said "[he] could go around assaulting women" ?

And when you, specifically, call someone here stupid or wicked (and more) and "cite their statements" what you've actually done is taken their statements and stirred them around in your mind with some sick little fantasies and spewed out the results.

You actually wrote this sentence in a post where you also asserted that someone was stirring things “around in [their] mind with some sick little fantasies and spewed out the results”:

“The Left is so power hungry they've let their rhetoric nearly get their opponent killed twice.”

I'm not surprised you'd equate his sick fantasies with fact.

[wbtravis007]

I see. So second and third- hand accounts from embittered former employees are fair game, even when many of those are contradicted by others present. Kind of like the $60,000 funeral lies?Now explain Hillary stating "Next week Trump is recreating the Nazi rally from 1939 at Madison Square Garden." I dont recall seeing anything instructing attendees to wear swastikas. She's clearly learned zero since her "deplorables" comment went over so well. And "power- hungry"? Lmao. The Left is so power hungry they've let their rhetoric nearly get their opponent killed twice.

Oh, and by 'quoting" him, do you mean like "calling neo-nazis very fine people"? Or maybe "we should inject people with bleach?"or perhaps when he said "[he] could go around assaulting women" ?

And when you, specifically, call someone here stupid or wicked (and more) and "cite their statements" what you've actually done is taken their statements and stirred them around in your mind with some sick little fantasies and spewed out the results.

You actually wrote this sentence in a post where you also asserted that someone was stirring things “around in [their] mind with some sick little fantasies and spewed out the results”:

“The Left is so power hungry they've let their rhetoric nearly get their opponent killed twice.”

I'm not surprised you'd equate his sick fantasies with fact.

Your sentence makes no sense. Kind of reminds me of a fair bit of what that guy had written that you posted the other day. Man … talk about a word salad!

Just a lot of gibberish full of sound and fury signifying nothing.

[tlynn78]

You actually wrote this sentence in a post where you also asserted that someone was stirring things “around in [their] mind with some sick little fantasies and spewed out the results”:

“The Left is so power hungry they've let their rhetoric nearly get their opponent killed twice.”

I'm not surprised you'd equate his sick fantasies with fact.

Your sentence makes no sense. Kind of reminds me of a fair bit of what that guy had written that you posted the other day. Man … talk about a word salad!

Just a lot of gibberish full of sound and fury signifying nothing.

Of course, dearie.

[wbtravis007]

I'm not surprised you'd equate his sick fantasies with fact.

Your sentence makes no sense. Kind of reminds me of a fair bit of what that guy had written that you posted the other day. Man … talk about a word salad!

Just a lot of gibberish full of sound and fury signifying nothing.

Of course, dearie.