How many Canadians need to die to make America great again

[Weyoun]

I have a question for the more fascist leaning members of our board.

Trump in an interview before the Super Bowl repeated his desire to take over Canada.

As an initial matter, I find the situation problematic because he did not mention this during the campaign. I feel that going to war against our most important friend and neighbor should be a campaign issue. He was pretty clearly thinking about it given how quickly he rolled the thing out.

But my question for you is this: to make America great again, how many Canadians do you think need to die? Keep in mind, they will resist any attempt to be taken over. So you can’t just say that you want to take them over and nothing bad happens. They don’t want to give up their healthcare system for Trump’s healthcare chaos, for example. They have a reason to view this as life and death.

We have Canadians who read this board. Do you want to tell them whether or not they may need to die, or a family member needs to die, just so America can get access to oil sands they already receive gas from at a discount?

Give us a number. What is the acceptable loss of Canadians? You support the guy. Own this.

[flockofseagulls104]

The answer, of course, is zero. And you know that.

Never once has Trump said the military would be involved in any scenario. Your side makes shit like that up to enflame people like you who have lost all sense of the rational. He is holding out this possible outcome to encourage meaningful negotiations to accomplish his goals with Canada.

Cana - 'duh'.

And for the 4th time. Explain for me and all of us the meaning behind the newest pejorative you have assigned to me. What does 'whitefailure' mean? What exactly is it referring to?

The name I assigned to you, 'ifonly', comes from your post in which you expressed disappointment that the Butler assassin missed his target. And BTW, I think this pastor is inviting you to join his church.

[kroxquo]

The answer, of course, is zero. And you know that.

Never once has Trump said the military would be involved in any scenario. Your side makes shit like that up to enflame people like you who have lost all sense of the rational. He is holding out this possible outcome to encourage meaningful negotiations to accomplish his goals with Canada.

Cana - 'duh'.

And for the 4th time. Explain for me and all of us the meaning behind the newest pejorative you have assigned to me. What does 'whitefailure' mean? What exactly is it referring to?

The name I assigned to you, 'ifonly', comes from your post in which you expressed disappointment that the Butler assassin missed his target. And BTW, I think this pastor is inviting you to join his church.

So how does he accomplish his goal of the 51st state if the Canadian people reject his overtures (as they inevitably will)?

Could we set up some sort of signal system for us dim witted leftists and foreign nationals who might be unfamiliar with the the subtleties of the English? Something to indicate when we should take the President at his word because statements like "The US will take over the Gaza Strip and we will do a job with it too," or "You get rid of that artificially drawn line, and you take a look at what that looks like, and it would also be much better for national security." or "If all of the hostages aren't returned by Saturday 12 o'clock -- I think it's an appropriate time -- I would say cancel it and all bets are off and let hell break out," sure sound like he is making definitive statements and not spitballing, or floating proposals, or being sarcastic as some have claimed. So I would like to see a traffic light in front of him during any statement - green for he actually means what he is saying, yellow for may be serious maybe not, and red for just ignore this - he'll change his mind in a couple days.

[flockofseagulls104]

The answer, of course, is zero. And you know that.

Never once has Trump said the military would be involved in any scenario. Your side makes shit like that up to enflame people like you who have lost all sense of the rational. He is holding out this possible outcome to encourage meaningful negotiations to accomplish his goals with Canada.

Cana - 'duh'.

And for the 4th time. Explain for me and all of us the meaning behind the newest pejorative you have assigned to me. What does 'whitefailure' mean? What exactly is it referring to?

The name I assigned to you, 'ifonly', comes from your post in which you expressed disappointment that the Butler assassin missed his target. And BTW, I think this pastor is inviting you to join his church.

So how does he accomplish his goal of the 51st state if the Canadian people reject his overtures (as they inevitably will)?

Could we set up some sort of signal system for us dim witted leftists and foreign nationals who might be unfamiliar with the the subtleties of the English? Something to indicate when we should take the President at his word because statements like "The US will take over the Gaza Strip and we will do a job with it too," or "You get rid of that artificially drawn line, and you take a look at what that looks like, and it would also be much better for national security." or "If all of the hostages aren't returned by Saturday 12 o'clock -- I think it's an appropriate time -- I would say cancel it and all bets are off and let hell break out," sure sound like he is making definitive statements and not spitballing, or floating proposals, or being sarcastic as some have claimed. So I would like to see a traffic light in front of him during any statement - green for he actually means what he is saying, yellow for may be serious maybe not, and red for just ignore this - he'll change his mind in a couple days.

The point is whether the people he is addressing believe him. It seems to work for him. Because he has a record of following through with what he says he will do. ALL FOR THE GOOD OF THE UNITED STATES.

You have nothing but TDS to go on. You seem to have conceded the fact that he has not threatened military action to accomplish Canada as a 51st state, so, like all the TDS sufferers, you need to change the subject rather than conceding the fact you are wrong. Maybe, just maybe, he really doesn't want a Canadian 51st state. Maybe he just wants them to do what they need to to avoid it.

So to address your change of subject, his first threat to let hell break out produced action after 2 years of no action. We have seen how they treated these hostages by their physical condition and their testimony. So now he wants them all back at once. We will see if they concede or what kind of hell will break out. This could have been done on Oct 8. The only reason it wasn't was because of biden's handlers, whose corruption is now being uncovered and exposed every day. What is your problem with that, krox?

[flockofseagulls104]

Watching press conference with Trump and the King of Jordan right now. He said exactly what I posted in the previous post ^^^. And the King of Jordan supports him.

What is your problem with America actually solving real problems?

[Weyoun]

Watching press conference with Trump and the King of Jordan right now. He said exactly what I posted in the previous post ^^^. And the King of Jordan supports him.

What is your problem with America actually solving real problems?

I think the King of Jordan is a difficult spot because of the amount of money that we send them (weirdly, that’s one thing Trump does not want to cut, because anything related to Israel is worth throwing billions at).

However, having been to Jordan, it’s not a place that can accommodate a huge amount of Gazan refugees. They were already dealing with some West Bank refugees and some folks who fled Syria.

The bottom line is, Saudi Arabia opposes this ethnic cleansing plan endorsed by Donald Trump, so it goes nowhere. As really any right thinking, moral person would.

[flockofseagulls104]

The bottom line is, Saudi Arabia opposes this ethnic cleansing plan endorsed by Donald Trump, so it goes nowhere. As really any right thinking, moral person would.

Yes, we all know Saudi Arabia is chock full of right-thinking, moral people.

BTW, what does whitefailure mean?

[flockofseagulls104]

However, having been to Jordan, it’s not a place that can accommodate a huge amount of Gazan refugees.

Oh, so you have been to Jordan, and know that fer sher, huh?

Piece of work you are.

[BackInTex]

However, having been to Jordan, it’s not a place that can accommodate a huge amount of Gazan refugees.

Oh, so you have been to Jordan, and know that fer sher, huh?

Piece of work you are.

Jordan is 34,495 square miles.
Gaza is 141 square miles.

I think it would fit.

[Spock]

However, having been to Jordan, it’s not a place that can accommodate a huge amount of Gazan refugees.

Oh, so you have been to Jordan, and know that fer sher, huh?

Piece of work you are.

A little background would be nice. Was he there with Doctors Without Borders or a similar group? Was he there with a UN Fact Finding mission to determine if Jordan can handle more refugees?

I have been to Mexico a couple times-but I do not claim special knowledge about the cartels.

OTOH, I have been to Africa 3 times and I do claim extensive knowledge on African conservation issues based on personal experience, widespread reading and contacts with people who know a lot about it.

[Weyoun]

The bottom line is, Saudi Arabia opposes this ethnic cleansing plan endorsed by Donald Trump, so it goes nowhere. As really any right thinking, moral person would.

Yes, we all know Saudi Arabia is chock full of right-thinking, moral people.

BTW, what does whitefailure mean?

Who cares if they are right? They'd have to support any initiative if it's going to work.

[Weyoun]

However, having been to Jordan, it’s not a place that can accommodate a huge amount of Gazan refugees.

Oh, so you have been to Jordan, and know that fer sher, huh?

Piece of work you are.

Jordan is 34,495 square miles.
Gaza is 141 square miles.

I think it would fit.

Except that a lot of it is desert, and (as mentioned, and predictably ignored) they already are dealing with West Bank and Syrian refugees. They have a native population of about 7.5 million, and a refugee population already of about 3.5 million.

Weird how all the hicks here think that every country BUT the US needs to take in refugees (unless they are white South African farmers).

Hope that helps!

[Weyoun]

However, having been to Jordan, it’s not a place that can accommodate a huge amount of Gazan refugees.

Oh, so you have been to Jordan, and know that fer sher, huh?

Piece of work you are.

A little background would be nice. Was he there with Doctors Without Borders or a similar group? Was he there with a UN Fact Finding mission to determine if Jordan can handle more refugees?

I have been to Mexico a couple times-but I do not claim special knowledge about the cartels.

OTOH, I have been to Africa 3 times and I do claim extensive knowledge on African conservation issues based on personal experience, widespread reading and contacts with people who know a lot about it.

That's great.

[Spock]

Oh, so you have been to Jordan, and know that fer sher, huh?

Piece of work you are.

Jordan is 34,495 square miles.
Gaza is 141 square miles.

I think it would fit.

Except that a lot of it is desert, and (as mentioned, and predictably ignored) they already are dealing with West Bank and Syrian refugees. They have a native population of about 7.5 million, and a refugee population already of about 3.5 million.

Weird how all the hicks here think that every country BUT the US needs to take in refugees (unless they are white South African farmers).

Hope that helps!

Oooh. 5 seconds of Googling and you are an expert on Jordan.

[Spock]

Oh, so you have been to Jordan, and know that fer sher, huh?

Piece of work you are.

A little background would be nice. Was he there with Doctors Without Borders or a similar group? Was he there with a UN Fact Finding mission to determine if Jordan can handle more refugees?

I have been to Mexico a couple times-but I do not claim special knowledge about the cartels.

OTOH, I have been to Africa 3 times and I do claim extensive knowledge on African conservation issues based on personal experience, widespread reading and contacts with people who know a lot about it.

That's great.

Whatever. I know that I know what I know and I will not waste one second of time (beyond this) justifying or explaining my knowledge base to you. I have spent enough time arguing about it with people (SSS) whose entire knowledge of the subject is based on 5 seconds of Googling as yours would be.

Since you won't tell us, I assume that your trip to Jordan was with Doctors Without Borders. Thank you for your service.

But, just for fun, I will give you a fun geography question that you might get. Without Googling-what is the Dahomey Gap?

[flockofseagulls104]

A little background would be nice. Was he there with Doctors Without Borders or a similar group? Was he there with a UN Fact Finding mission to determine if Jordan can handle more refugees?

I have been to Mexico a couple times-but I do not claim special knowledge about the cartels.

OTOH, I have been to Africa 3 times and I do claim extensive knowledge on African conservation issues based on personal experience, widespread reading and contacts with people who know a lot about it.

That's great.

Whatever. I know that I know what I know and I will not waste one second of time (beyond this) justifying or explaining my knowledge base to you. I have spent enough time arguing about it with people (SSS) whose entire knowledge of the subject is based on 5 seconds of Googling as yours would be.

Since you won't tell us, I assume that your trip to Jordan was with Doctors Without Borders. Thank you for your service.

But, just for fun, I will give you a fun geography question that you might get. Without Googling-what is the Dahomey Gap?

Why have fun with him? You know that he knows nothing. Ask him my question: What does whitefailure mean?

[Weyoun]

Jordan is 34,495 square miles.
Gaza is 141 square miles.

I think it would fit.

Except that a lot of it is desert, and (as mentioned, and predictably ignored) they already are dealing with West Bank and Syrian refugees. They have a native population of about 7.5 million, and a refugee population already of about 3.5 million.

Weird how all the hicks here think that every country BUT the US needs to take in refugees (unless they are white South African farmers).

Hope that helps!

Oooh. 5 seconds of Googling and you are an expert on Jordan.

I’ve actually been there and I know someone from there, and we have talked about this stuff.

It seems like my opinion is more substantiated than Texas fatmouth literally just googling square mileage and reporting back to us.

[Spock]

Except that a lot of it is desert, and (as mentioned, and predictably ignored) they already are dealing with West Bank and Syrian refugees. They have a native population of about 7.5 million, and a refugee population already of about 3.5 million.

Weird how all the hicks here think that every country BUT the US needs to take in refugees (unless they are white South African farmers).

Hope that helps!

Oooh. 5 seconds of Googling and you are an expert on Jordan.

I’ve actually been there and I know someone from there, and we have talked about this stuff.

It seems like my opinion is more substantiated than Texas fatmouth literally just googling square mileage and reporting back to us.

This is like pulling teeth. Where were you in Jordan? How much time did you spend in-country-etc?

Now if you answer something like-you were there with the State Department (wink, wink, nudge nudge) we will accept that you were there with the CIA and can't tell us-but unless that is the case-a little background would be nice.

Wow!!! You know one person from Jordan-Cool-what is his story?

I would have thought with your years of higher education and working in the medical field that you would have known more than one Jordanian.

[Weyoun]

Oooh. 5 seconds of Googling and you are an expert on Jordan.

I’ve actually been there and I know someone from there, and we have talked about this stuff.

It seems like my opinion is more substantiated than Texas fatmouth literally just googling square mileage and reporting back to us.

This is like pulling teeth. Where were you in Jordan? How much time did you spend in-country-etc?

Now if you answer something like-you were there with the State Department (wink, wink, nudge nudge) we will accept that you were there with the CIA and can't tell us-but unless that is the case-a little background would be nice.

Wow!!! You know one person from Jordan-Cool-what is his story?

I would have thought with your years of higher education and working in the medical field that you would have known more than one Jordanian.

I noticed that you’ve not actually attacked what I’ve said. What I say is true. The country is under a great deal of stress and it’s much smaller than the United States. Asking them to take a whole bunch of people not from there, enough to where the refugee population almost matches their entire native population, is obviously not practical, and you are not so stupid to see that.

I understand what Bob and SSS tired of this crowd, because you can only make up for your lack of knowledge with ad hominems.

Given your cunty panicking over Latin immigration, you of all people should understand that argument.

Of course, if there is some blog written by some saffer you listen to that says otherwise, I’m all ears.

[Spock]

I’ve actually been there and I know someone from there, and we have talked about this stuff.

It seems like my opinion is more substantiated than Texas fatmouth literally just googling square mileage and reporting back to us.

This is like pulling teeth. Where were you in Jordan? How much time did you spend in-country-etc?

Now if you answer something like-you were there with the State Department (wink, wink, nudge nudge) we will accept that you were there with the CIA and can't tell us-but unless that is the case-a little background would be nice.

Wow!!! You know one person from Jordan-Cool-what is his story?

I would have thought with your years of higher education and working in the medical field that you would have known more than one Jordanian.

I noticed that you’ve not actually attacked what I’ve said. What I say is true. The country is under a great deal of stress and it’s much smaller than the United States. Asking them to take a whole bunch of people not from there, enough to where the refugee population almost matches their entire native population, is obviously not practical, and you are not so stupid to see that.

I understand what Bob and SSS tired of this crowd, because you can only make up for your lack of knowledge with ad hominems.

Given your cunty panicking over Latin immigration, you of all people should understand that argument.

Of course, if there is some blog written by some saffer you listen to that says otherwise, I’m all ears.

C'mon, you can be honest. What was it? A day trip to Petra?

Apropos of nothing, I am reminded of a pretty heated argument I saw (and overheard) in the NDSU dining center-Circa 1986-between a Jordanian and a Turk about geopolitics. The Turk was friendly to the US and the Jordanian was a big Soviet Union guy.

[Weyoun]

This is like pulling teeth. Where were you in Jordan? How much time did you spend in-country-etc?

Now if you answer something like-you were there with the State Department (wink, wink, nudge nudge) we will accept that you were there with the CIA and can't tell us-but unless that is the case-a little background would be nice.

Wow!!! You know one person from Jordan-Cool-what is his story?

I would have thought with your years of higher education and working in the medical field that you would have known more than one Jordanian.

I noticed that you’ve not actually attacked what I’ve said. What I say is true. The country is under a great deal of stress and it’s much smaller than the United States. Asking them to take a whole bunch of people not from there, enough to where the refugee population almost matches their entire native population, is obviously not practical, and you are not so stupid to see that.

I understand what Bob and SSS tired of this crowd, because you can only make up for your lack of knowledge with ad hominems.

Given your cunty panicking over Latin immigration, you of all people should understand that argument.

Of course, if there is some blog written by some saffer you listen to that says otherwise, I’m all ears.

C'mon, you can be honest. What was it? A day trip to Petra?

Apropos of nothing, I am reminded of a pretty heated argument I saw (and overheard) in the NDSU dining center-Circa 1986-between a Jordanian and a Turk about geopolitics. The Turk was friendly to the US and the Jordanian was a big Soviet Union guy.

That's great.

[flockofseagulls104]

I noticed that you’ve not actually attacked what I’ve said. What I say is true. The country is under a great deal of stress and it’s much smaller than the United States. Asking them to take a whole bunch of people not from there, enough to where the refugee population almost matches their entire native population, is obviously not practical, and you are not so stupid to see that.

What you didn't notice is that nobody has said that ALL the Palestinians have to go to Jordan. But in your haste to criticize and call other people stupid, you might have missed that fact. Understandable.

I understand what Bob and SSS tired of this crowd, because you can only make up for your lack of knowledge with ad hominems.

I don't go over to the mainland that much, so I may have missed it. I thought they are not here because of illnesses.

You, ifonly, are the King of Ad Hominems. On that subject, can you please explain what is meant by 'whitefailure'. Or are you regretting ever coining that? Is that why you won't explain what you mean by it?

[Spock]

Weyoun>>>"I understand what Bob and SSS tired of this crowd, because you can only make up for your lack of knowledge with ad hominems."<<<

You give them a lot more credit than I do. I figure it is more along the lines that their whole emotional well-being for years was tied up in hoping against hope that Trump would go to prison. When that went away-it was like a balloon deflating.

You don't have the time here that a lot of us do, but SSS is/was (?) the king of ad-hominem attacks. "Putin's boy"-etc etc. There were a few threads with SSS which I was able to finally drag into a good discussion but that took post after post after post of cutting through his crap/schtick to get there.

You weren't here then, but if you want to see the epitome of ad-hominem attacks and such go look back at the multiple threads that I tried to start during the early days of Covid. I had to keep starting new ones because of all ad homimen attacks and such that SSS and the Bobs kept polluting them with.

[Weyoun]

Weyoun>>>"I understand what Bob and SSS tired of this crowd, because you can only make up for your lack of knowledge with ad hominems."<<<

You give them a lot more credit than I do. I figure it is more along the lines that their whole emotional well-being for years was tied up in hoping against hope that Trump would go to prison. When that went away-it was like a balloon deflating.

You don't have the time here that a lot of us do, but SSS is/was (?) the king of ad-hominem attacks. "Putin's boy"-etc etc. There were a few threads with SSS which I was able to finally drag into a good discussion but that took post after post after post of cutting through his crap/schtick to get there.

You weren't here then, but if you want to see the epitome of ad-hominem attacks and such go look back at the multiple threads that I tried to start during the early days of Covid. I had to keep starting new ones because of all ad homimen attacks and such that SSS and the Bobs kept polluting them with.

SSS writes the most detailed, news-based commentary on here. His legal analysis is terrific. To someone who lives in a fact-free world, being told truth must seem like an insult.

[Spock]

Weyoun>>>"I understand what Bob and SSS tired of this crowd, because you can only make up for your lack of knowledge with ad hominems."<<<

You give them a lot more credit than I do. I figure it is more along the lines that their whole emotional well-being for years was tied up in hoping against hope that Trump would go to prison. When that went away-it was like a balloon deflating.

You don't have the time here that a lot of us do, but SSS is/was (?) the king of ad-hominem attacks. "Putin's boy"-etc etc. There were a few threads with SSS which I was able to finally drag into a good discussion but that took post after post after post of cutting through his crap/schtick to get there.

You weren't here then, but if you want to see the epitome of ad-hominem attacks and such go look back at the multiple threads that I tried to start during the early days of Covid. I had to keep starting new ones because of all ad homimen attacks and such that SSS and the Bobs kept polluting them with.

SSS writes the most detailed, news-based commentary on here. His legal analysis is terrific. To someone who lives in a fact-free world, being told truth must seem like an insult.

ROFLMAO-I guess? If you consider repeatedly calling people things like "Putin's Boy," "Racist" ad infinitum etc etc ' "detailed, news-based commentary" you might have a point.

But then you are well known for making up peoples' posting here-so why wouldn't you make up SSS's posting history?

BTW-Have you had any luck backing up your assertions that I posted videos here "showing that the Ukrainian soldiers were all gay?"

Oh, and BTW-is your racist description of Black men who are concerned about Black-on Black violence/crime as "they just want a seat at the table with the white folks" an example of your "detailed news-based commentary" that us plebs here are just too stupid to understand?