silverscreenselect wrote: ↑Tue Jun 25, 2024 1:21 pm
It's getting so you can't tell the swamp creatures apart. Who's the real Republican, the one alleging election fraud now, or the one endorsed by Trump who alleged election fraud four years ago?
Moral of the story: It's only election fraud when you lose.
So, again, no answer, deflecting again. Election fraud is rampant in our system. But all you do is make excuses for the status quo. If trump wins in Nov, the same assholes that claimed he was illegitimate (and never got prosecuted for it) in 2016 will again come out of the woodwork. The only cure to stop both sides from contesting every election is to go back to hand marked paper ballots and hand counting.
Since you have decided not to shut up, I'll take you up on your pitiful challenge. I will never change the rathole you use as a mind, but maybe you will shut up this time. I worked on this for another reason, but I will share it here.
I challenge you to independently verify the next piece of drivel you post beforehand. You won't because you can't.
I can and I will. I can independently validate anything that I have the publicly available data from the SOS for. And every case I have attempted to validate so far is TRUE.
Here's the first piece of evidence in the Amicus Brief to Tullos v Raffensperger. Trollboy gets another court case that ignored the evidence presented to it. SCOTUS denied to take it up with no explanation. But that does not invalidate the evidence supporting the case. The evidence WAS NOT CONSIDERED IN THIS DECISION. Just like all the other ‘cases’, I suspect. It just gives cover to crimes that have been committed. It is both state and federal law that the SOS is required to keep a concise and accurate voter roll. This and hundreds of other examples show that not only is the SOS not complying with the law, but is actually manipulating the voter roll. If you have any interest in the truth, find the Amicus Brief appendices yourself. They are on line. It shows many more selected examples of the thousands of malfeasances and blatant crimes that have been found.
Case One: Not only shows a deceased has shown back up on the voter roll, but that the SoS has “cloned” the deceased three times in one year.
See below the case of Reg ID 10038837 who died in 2019, in Pearson, GA and reissued on the GA voter roll March, 2023.
2019-06-05-Reg ID 10038837 died in Pearson,GA. The obituary was found.
2019-08-22-Atkinson County Cancelled this ID and the reason was “Deceased”. (A screenshot was included which I cannot reproduce on the bored)
2023-03-07 – Reg ID 10038837 was reissued on the voter roll. A second “clone/duplicate” ID, which is the same person with two Reg IDs, “10038837 R” was also issued on the voter roll.
2023-06-30 – The first Reg ID 10038837 drops off the voter roll and a third clone/duplicate ID, 14202166 is issued on the voter roll.
2023-08-30 – The third ID 14202166 drops off the voter roll leaving the second clone ID “10038837 R”.
2024-02-05-the second ID “10038837 R” drops off the voter roll and a fourth ID “14300475” appears. This is four Reg IDs in the voter database spanning a year on a single Deceased person that died in 2019, that had been previously cancelled due to being “Deceased”.
Verification:
* I have searched for and found the obituary for T.E. Birthdate August 15, 1929. He died on June 5, 2019.
* Reg ID 10038837 does not appear on Voter Roll dated 20230205
* Reg ID 10038837 (Initials T.E on Albany Ave) appears on Voter Roll dated 20230307, along with Reg ID "10038837 R" (Same initials and address) on the same voter roll dated 20230307. (Note – Reg IDs are supposed to be unique NUMBERS, they are not supposed to be alphanumeric)
* In Voter Roll dated 20230630, the following entries appear: (Note we have 2 entries for RegID 14202166, This is supposed to be a unique identifier. In ANY valid database, this is a blatant unforgivable error. This would be a firing offense in the private sector.)
Reg ID Initials Status BirthYear Address
"10038837 R", T.E "Active", "1929", "ALBANY AVE W"
"14202166", T.E "Active", "1929", "CANCELLED VOTER STREET"
"14202166", T.E "Active", "2005", "ALBANY AVE W"
* In Voter Roll dated 20230913 (I do not currently have the 20230830 voter roll), only the "10038837 R" remains, same initials same street address.
* In Voter Roll dated 20240205 only a Reg ID 14300475 appears, with the same name and the same address as the other three registrations mentioned above.
* On the most current voter roll 20240603, Reg ID 14300475 is still there, same name and address. (With the birth year of 1929)
I know it’s hard for you to follow data logic. I suspect you have the same problem with objective truth. I did not do this work for you trollboy, but I decided to share it here in answer to your bullcrap ‘challenge’, to ‘make you look silly’. What’s your response? Are you going to address reality, or will you continue to deflect, or will you just shut up about it (preferred).
Note: For clarity, Initials and Name are the same in all cases. I did not want to include the person's actual name out of respect for the dead. It is apparent the SOS has no respect for the dead. But he does have the power to resurrect the dead. He must be important!